"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
It was televised. Hard to twist it too much.
But...he'll be busy claiming victory over China, as they agreed in principle to lower tariffs on U.S autos from 40%, to 15%. The rate is was before they matched trump's idiotic tariffs with a 25% increase.
Is this what he meant by being a genius negotiator?
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
Yes, as you know.
Sure he was. Obamacare was basically just a rebranding of Romneycare.In truth, he wasn't.
It depends on what we're referring to with the term "obstructionism." If you apply that label to a party standing up for their ideals by refusing to be buffaloed into allowing a policy they think will be harmful to be pushed through, then that "obstructionism" is the proper role of an opposition party. If, on the other hand, we're talking about a party that rejects its own best ideas, with lock-step opposition, merely to hand the other party a loss, that's bad obstructionism. Got it now?You are once again deflecting from the answer to my question; why was obstructionism NOT okay when Obama was President, but now, suddenly okay?
What do you imagine was dishonest about what I said? I have no idea what point you're trying to make here.There you go lying again. First and foremost; when Obamacare was passed, there were no checks. Democrats controlled the house and the Senate. Why are you such a dishonest buffoon?
There was. It was called Romneycare. And it wasn't embraced by just any Republican -- it was embraced by the man the Republicans would soon choose to lead them in the 2012 election. But then Obama got behind it, and the Republicans switched sides so they could oppose him.Secondly, there was never a "Republican" solution
You misunderstood. Try rereading. Good luck.Wrong again; using Obamacare as your example misses the entire point of obstructionism and checks and balances because Democrats had complete control of the House and the Senate.
They have explained on many occasions why they oppose the border wall. It's a huge waste of taxpayer money. Now, if Trump could make good on his promise and get Mexico to pay for it, that wouldn't be an issue. But he has since betrayed that promise and now looks to pay for it with general revenues or tariffs that will come out of the pockets of American consumers. So, Congress is telling him no. Maybe if Trump had been honest about how he planned to pay for it from the start, we wouldn't even be in this mess. But he lied, and enough imbeciles believed his lie to put the election close enough for the Electoral College to hand him the presidency, and now here we are.Ironic in that what we are seeing right now from the Democrats is brainless obstructionism. They cant even explain, other than they hate Trump, why they oppose the border wall or any of Trumps agenda.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
Bourbon (12-11-2018)
Althea (12-11-2018)
Oh Fuck Me, she went there: Pelosi privately disses Trump's manhood after White House meeting
Nancy Pelosi was on fire with her fellow Democrats.
Minutes after a very public showdown with Donald Trump over his border wall with Mexico, the California Democrat returned to the Capitol and railed against the president in a private meeting with House Democrats.
Trump “must have said the word ‘wall’ 30 times,” the House minority leader said, according to multiple sources in the room.
“I was trying to be the mom,” she added, but “it goes to show you: you get into a tinkle contest with a skunk, you get tinkle all over you.”
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...eeting-1057607
I predict an angry tweet in her NEAR future.
ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch
This will be great. I love government shutdowns(definitely do NOT care who starts it either)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“The Communist party must control the guns.”
― Mao Tse-tung
“Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”-Generally attributed to Uncle Joe Stalin
“Everything under heaven is in utter choas; the situation is excellent.”
― mao tse-tung
Truth Detector (12-11-2018)
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
Frank Apisa (12-11-2018)
Bookmarks