Originally Posted by
floridafan
I am please to hear that YOU know exactly what the framers of the Constitution actually meant. There are legal ways to change the constitution, and what Trump threatened to do was not one of them, nor was your excuse for his action.
Well, we are not talking about "what the framers of the [1789] Constitution meant", we are talking what the framers of the 1868 14th Amendment meant when they qualified / limited the granting of citizenship to only those who were, "subject to the jurisdiction [of the United States]". It is vitally important what that term meant to those lawmakers in the 1860's and that meaning does not support the granting of birth-right citizenship as it is awarded today.
The writers of the 14th Amendment did define the meaning of this pretty explicitly:
>> John Bingham: “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
>> Sen. Trumbull: "The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means."
So, a simple reading of the framers allows us to definitively say the intent of the 14th was to legally ignore any birth to parents here on vacation and planning on returning to their native land or births to migrant/transient workers. Citizenship of the child is entirely dependent upon the national attachments/allegiances of the parent[s].
Now if the granting of US citizenship does have certain specific exclusions and is absolutely not absolute, my position that birth-right citizenship needs to be examined and the question of who exactly is to be granted citizenship needs to be decided, is unquestionably reasonable.
But to be sure, that's a subject for another thread.
We could discuss why the left reads the 2nd Amendment and sees all manner of qualifications and conditions and restrictions on the rights of CITIZEN'S -- but then can ignore explicit qualifications and conditions on non-citizens where they are expressly stated.
I could ask, WASSUWIDDAT?! but we already know, it is just the leftist practice of perverting and mutating words and misconstructing laws to serve the leftist agenda.
Which brings us back to my first post in this thread speaking to why so much money and energy was spent by gun rights people to elect someone who promised to select judges and Justices to uphold the Constitution and reject / defeat the person promising to destroy what are considered fundamental rights of citizens.
.
.
Bookmarks