USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2018)
When linking to articles in order to support a point of view I think it would be nice if people not only supplied the link but also quoted the portion or portions of the article they believe supports their argument and then give a brief summary, in their own words, why they believe the article supports their argument.
I'm not suggesting this be made a rule on this board, although it is on many others, but it might be nice as individuals to adopt this approach. Having to actually read the article and pull quotes from it instead of just tossing a link out there and doing nothing else will help avoid "confusion" over what the article really says and that will enhance debate and understanding which is good for us all, isn't it?
Don't be afraid to see what you see
USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2018)
What kind of country have we become?
One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”
and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?
evince (12-14-2018)
I've had this dishonest shit on iggy for years so can anyone translate lying faggot to English for me?
Don't be afraid to see what you see
Truth Detector (12-14-2018), USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2018)
What kind of country have we become?
One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”
and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?
evince (12-14-2018)
I see zapparetard is still a lying hateful asshole.
Some things never change.
Rune (12-23-2018)
Truth Detector (12-14-2018), USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2018)
evince (12-14-2018)
Truth Detector (12-14-2018)
USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2018)
USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2018)
USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2018)
evince (12-14-2018)
USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2018)
Rune (12-23-2018)
Bookmarks