Times Person of the Year Predictions

[BRUTALITOPS]

Nancy Pelosi.

def a good guess

[BRUTALITOPS]

Mak2

[Flanders]

Brett Kavanaugh

[Althea]

Given the timing, it might just be H.W as a tribute.

[BRUTALITOPS]

Given the timing, it might just be H.W as a tribute.

doubtful. it's not about tributes it's about yearly impact on the news cycle and influence.

[Lightbringer]

it's that time of year again. who do you think it will be?

My guesses:

• Trump (obv choice)
• Mueller (also possible, not sure tho)
• Women (times does this sometimes and gives it to a group, totally conceivable they do something stupid like "the year of the women" or something completely retarded)

I can't really think of other people that have hugely impacted the news. If you want to correctly predict, it needs to be someone that's been in the news a lot and someone the times will want to circlejerk over (either negatively or positively)

I'm betting on Occasional-Cortex.

[CFM]

I saw Kaepernick as a name that was in competition

Doesn't the winner actually have to do something meaningful?

[Celticguy]

It will have to be an XX so why not Stormy ?

[Lightbringer]

It will have to be an XX so why not Stormy ?

Or Avenatti perhaps?

[signalmankenneth]

I would say, Jamal Khashoggi?

[Flanders]

File this one in the WHO GIVES A SHIT drawer:

‘The Guardians’: Time’s 2018 ‘Person of Year’ Is Persecuted Journalists
by Joshua Caplan
11 Dec 2018

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...d-journalists/

[Troll]

I would say, Jamal Khashoggi?

Close!

[Troll]

File this one in the WHO GIVES A SHIT drawer:

‘The Guardians’: Time’s 2018 ‘Person of Year’ Is Persecuted Journalists
by Joshua Caplan
11 Dec 2018

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...d-journalists/

Excellent! Spoken like a true freedom lover!!!! Trump is lucky to have you on his side and so is that Saudi kingdom.

[Flanders]

Excellent! Spoken like a true freedom lover!!!! Trump is lucky to have you on his side and so is that Saudi kingdom.

To Troll: Do not assume I am on Trump’s side because I have no use for the press:

If Americans want to protect the First Amendment start by eliminating these four words ——“or of the press” —— so that it reads:

First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Notice that the press would still enjoy freedom of speech like the rest of us, but they would have to defend freedom of speech as a matter of self-interest instead of only defending their constitutional privilege while they feed the rest us to Socialist/Communist wolves.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...45#post2754345

[CFM]

Maxine Walter

She has a better chance of getting the role of Aunt Esther in a Sanford and Son remake.