What the Mueller investigation will tell us in the end.

[Superfreak]

We now know of the Rump campaign's extensive efforts to illegally manipulate the international community and enlist their illegal help with Trumps election in any way possible.

Manafort, Cohen, Gates, Papadouplous and others were deeply involved.

Trump is well known as a micromanager and for knowing everything that goes on in his organizations.

So the question becomes... How skilled was Trump at covering his own trail and involvement. Did he think ahead and create plausible deniability, did he protect himself while allowing "his people to get their hands dirty? Did Trump keep at an arms length on these illegal activities, OR did he bumble into and out of it in a way that caused tracks.

I am not sure he knew these things were illegal so I wonder if he bothered to hide his trail.

The real question is how many times can you lie in one thread?

1) List the 'extensive efforts to illegally manipulate the international community'... or are you lying?

2) Please explain how each of the four were 'deeply involved'... or are you lying?

[Superfreak]

When you can explain the relevance of this I will answer.

the relevance of asking you to state the so called extensive list you claim is well known?

[Truth Detector]

1) When you get someone to cooperate you have them plead guilty to the least of the crimes.
2) During an active investigation you don't charge people with the ultimate crime until disclosure does not harm your ability to investigate.
3) Its clear where/what these crimes are.

I always thought that in order to have an investigation, one must have a crime. What is the crime? The FACT is that there is no crime or evidence suggesting that Trump won the election with the help of the Russians and that it is a laughably stupid argument in the first place.

This all happened under Obama's watch; yet Obama clearly stated that there is NO WAY our elections can get hacked. So I will ask again; where is the criminal behavior that Mueller was sent out to investigate?

If we accept this asinine and farcical notion that we can investigate Presidents, or anyone for that matter, simply based on hearsay and innuendo; then we have certainly fallen into third world shitholism.

4) Obviously I don't know if they will get Trump, see post #1, that's the point of this thread.

I can easily say that they have NOTHING on Trump. I am willing to bet a permanent ban on that FACT with you right here and right now. You, on the other hand, will be a coward and refuse to accept that because you entire goal on this forum is to be a left wing parrot of false leftist propaganda while pretending to know what it is you emote about.

[Truth Detector]

Mueller's investigation will reveal Trump's decades long efforts to build a huge cash cow in Moscow, working with whichever Russian despot, crashed and burned during his campaign, and included collusion with whichever Russian intel group by seedy Team Trump toady's as required, then was fully compromised by Putin after lying to the American people on the campaign trail about doing business in Russia

or something similar

Is it illegal to set up a business in Russia? Yes or no? Oh wait, you're banned so you can't answer that.

[Superfreak]

We don’t know everything Mueller had on these people, only the minimal crime he decided to use as to not reveal his full investigation. These people are too impatient.

LMAO... how many times are you going to defend his stupid fucking comments? People aren't impatient. Garud is making statements with nothing to substantiate them.

[Jarod]

The real question is how many times can you lie in one thread?

1) List the 'extensive efforts to illegally manipulate the international community'... or are you lying?

2) Please explain how each of the four were 'deeply involved'... or are you lying?

Educate yourself, read this article and it will catch you up.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/04/polit...ion/index.html

Then we can talk.

[Superfreak]

a fetus is not a baby

its cells inside the body of a full human being

society already decided that one with the help of science

Wrong moron. Science dictates that it is a unique human life. That is irrefutable. You are a science denier if you claim otherwise.

[Phantasmal]

LMAO... how many times are you going to defend his stupid fucking comments? People aren't impatient. Garud is making statements with nothing to substantiate them.

Poor Superfreak, you mad bro? Still? Always? Your temper gets you shut down often?

[Ralph]

a fetus is not a baby

its cells inside the body of a full human being

society already decided that one with the help of science

If those cells are not alive and HUMAN....what are they? Show us the science that tells us that human life does not begin at conception, there is no growth/life from the moment of conception. The inverse is true. Science details the fact that a gestating human life is a separate and unique example of human life with its own unique DNA signature, different from that of the mother or father. As far as society goes......moral societies make moral laws.....immoral societies make immoral laws. There was never a represented law that made abortion on demand legal....before that law was manufactured from the bench. This is a representative republic....not an oligarchy.

[Superfreak]

Educate yourself, read this article and it will catch you up.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/04/polit...ion/index.html

Then we can talk.

Read it. It does not state anything to support what you said. Now, answer the questions or admit you lied.

[Superfreak]

Poor Superfreak, you mad bro? Still? Always? Your temper gets you shut down often?

Poor Rana, you still trying to project your emotions on to others like so many of the moronic left like to do?

I am mocking you. Not angry in the least.

[Truth Detector]

We don’t know everything Mueller had on these people, only the minimal crime he decided to use as to not reveal his full investigation. These people are too impatient.

Too impatient? The investigation has been going on since May 17, 2017. You think that 18 months is insufficient time to determine if a campaign had stolen an election by colluding with Russians who presumably hacked into the DNC?

I almost have to laugh every time I type that. The Russians got Trump elected; how fucking dense does one have to be to buy into that one. While Obama is in charge nonetheless!!!

[Truth Detector]

Plenty of people are guilty of things they are never charged with.

So we should be like some Fascist state and presume people to be guilty without proof or proving anything?

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

a fetus is not a baby

its cells inside the body of a full human being

society already decided that one with the help of science

yep. inhumane perspective.

regardless of the word you call it, is it ok to scramble it with a utensil?

[Truth Detector]

Oh, its going to be fun watching this all come down.

How is making a mockery of our electoral process and the office of the President fun or funny?