Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Provoking New Crimes Rather than Uncovering Past Crimes: Mueller's Modus Operandi

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Provoking New Crimes Rather than Uncovering Past Crimes: Mueller's Modus Operandi

    This is an OP ED by Alan Dershowitz. One of the most unbiased Lawyers out there.



    by Alan M. Dershowitz
    November 30, 2018 at 5:00 am

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi
    Send
    Print

    Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

    Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

    In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

    Much more, well worth a read here: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    This is an OP ED by Alan Dershowitz. One of the most unbiased Lawyers out there.



    by Alan M. Dershowitz
    November 30, 2018 at 5:00 am

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi
    Send
    Print

    Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

    Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

    In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

    Much more, well worth a read here: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi


    LOL

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    LOL
    Nothing funny about your inability to read. No matter what your inbred parents told you.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Dershowitz is a hoot, the kook that keeps on giving lol

  5. The Following User Groans At reagansghost For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (11-30-2018)

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    Dershowitz is a hoot, the kook that keeps on giving lol
    What in the article do you disagree with?

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Nothing funny about your inability to read. No matter what your inbred parents told you.
    I think it is. But then I'm not the one who can't read. lol

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    This is an OP ED by Alan Dershowitz. One of the most unbiased Lawyers out there.



    by Alan M. Dershowitz
    November 30, 2018 at 5:00 am

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi
    Send
    Print

    Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

    Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

    In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

    Much more, well worth a read here: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi
    This is why the senate would never convict trump even if he was impeached.

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.
    Mueller is a Democratic hit man..he's all about a political agenda -so what if there is no collusion?
    as long as he can slime Trump, it's all he cares about like da resistance

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    What in the article do you disagree with?
    You don't really expect him to answer, do you?

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    Dershowitz is a hoot, the kook that keeps on giving lol
    Yeh, he's a top constitutional.lawyer, and you're what exactly???

  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Nothing funny about your inability to read. No matter what your inbred parents told you.


    LOL

  13. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    LOL
    Andy, you're just a geriatric twat, just shut the fuck up.

  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    This is an OP ED by Alan Dershowitz. One of the most unbiased Lawyers out there.



    by Alan M. Dershowitz
    November 30, 2018 at 5:00 am

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi
    Send
    Print

    Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

    Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

    In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

    Much more, well worth a read here: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi
    Dershowitz is right and wrong all at once.

    By any legal metric, if Mullet fails to find collusion he’s a failure. However, The Resistance couldn’t be less interested in how the criminal justice system is perverted or how many otherwise law abiding people are thrown into prison simply for being accused of lying to investigators *about something that isn’t a crime*. All The Resistance cares about is impeaching Trump and making his supporters pay for the election of 2016.

    Wittingly or unwittingly, Mullet is an arm of The Resistance. And I’m almost certain it’s wittingly. I have zero respect for anyone who would pervert the justice system for a political agenda—and destroy lives in the process. That’s a tad worse than Trump’s rhetoric on Twitter.

    Furthermore, I have absolutely zero respect for anyone who condones it. Mullet is an abomination as are his supporters.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  15. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    This is why the senate would never convict trump even if he was impeached.
    Might as well get ready for it.

    The democrat controlled House will impeach Trump for—something lol. How can they not? I’d venture to guess at least 40% of democrat voters have at least some degree of TDS. Democrats in the House will face a rebellion if they don’t draw up articles of impeachment against Trump.

    This could actually get interesting.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  16. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    What in the article do you disagree with?
    Dersh has always been very biased..

Similar Threads

  1. More R crimes in Arkansas
    By evince in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-31-2018, 04:13 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-14-2018, 02:24 AM
  3. Replies: 36
    Last Post: 05-24-2018, 10:20 AM
  4. Mueller Following the Money, Looks into Financial Crimes
    By Buckly J. Ewer in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-08-2017, 08:46 AM
  5. Bu$hCo. War Crimes
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-04-2008, 11:18 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •