evince (11-27-2018)
Manafort visits Assange on behalf of Trump to get Russian hacking dirt on Hillary.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...dorian-embassy
Manafort’s first visit to the embassy took place a year after Assange sought asylum inside, two sources said.
A separate internal document written by Ecuador’s Senain intelligence agency and seen by the Guardian lists “Paul Manaford [sic]” as one of several well-known guests. It also mentions “Russians”.
evince (11-27-2018)
"A separate internal document written by Ecuador’s Senain intelligence agency and seen by the Guardian lists “Paul Manaford [sic]” as one of several well-known guests. It also mentions “Russians”.
Trump is a fool to turn on Manafort.
Micawber (11-27-2018), Tranquillus in Exile (11-27-2018)
evince (11-27-2018)
If she was there to get info on Clinton, sure.
I don't think she was working for Trump ...
Pamela Anderson slams Donald Trump for groping comments
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...sity-talk.html
Manafort, 69, denies involvement in the hack and says the claim is “100% false”. His lawyers initially declined to answer the Guardian’s questions about the visits.
In a series of tweets WikiLeaks said Assange and Manafort had not met. Assange described the story as a hoax.
this is an international investigation folks
the republicans cant cover it all up world wide
the republicans cant win this one
Donald Trump is one of the nuttiest of all you hypocrites.
Cry's like a baby when someone leaks something out of the White House but yet says crap like, "I love Wikileaks"!
Do any of you hypocrites have anything to say about that? LOL!
I didn't think so!
kudzu (11-27-2018)
Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort held secret talks with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and visited around the time he joined Trump’s campaign, the Guardian has been told.
. . .
One person familiar with WikiLeaks said Assange was motivated to damage the Democrats campaign because he believed a future Trump administration would be less likely to seek his extradition on possible charges of espionage.
. . .
Trump warmly welcomed the dump of DNC emails by Assange. In October 2016 he declared: “I love WikiLeaks.” Trump’s comments came after WikiLeaks released a second tranche of emails seized from the email account of John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign chairman.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...dorian-embassy
But they all deny it, so that's ok.
Come on "anatta," your not talking about individuals with a steller record of telling the truth. Not saying that something occurred, but would Manaford visit the Ecuadorian embassy?
The thing that is interesting is how dating back the last few years the right has created all kinds of conspiracies based upon less circumstantial evidence, Hannity still regurgitates them often, but now we have this plus the Trump Tower meeting and they are accepting the account of recognized liars
If Hilary did some bad shit, does it matter where the information came from? Isn't the relevant point that Hilary did some bad shit? Same thing with Donald.
I never got the whole thing about being pissed at the Russians, or wikileaks, or whoever-the-fuck, for providing true information, as long as it was true.
If you believe that man is good, there is no need for government. If you believe that man is bad, you dare not create one.
Not about just "providing information," the Russians orchestrated an espionage effort to undermine the US elections, that is a given. If it is discovered that any campaign willingly worked along side and coordinated efforts with the Russians, it becomes a serious affair
Bookmarks