Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Kamala Harris and a 21st century example of McCarthyism

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default Kamala Harris and a 21st century example of McCarthyism

    Reedy told me that what marveled him most was McCarthy’s ability to ask questions or make statements insinuating something evil about a person he was questioning without formally lodging an allegation.
    In fact, he said, McCarthy might add a qualification to his question, suggesting that wasn’t making an accusation — before implying that very accusation.


    McCarthy’s questions whipped up hysteria that marked those he questioned as “guilty as charged” without a shred of evidence.

    Those lessons had long faded into the recesses of my memory, until Thursday. That’s when a question-and-answer exchange involving Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) resurrected them.

    In her questioning, during a confirmation hearing for Ronald Vitiello, President Trump’s nominee to lead Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Harris asked whether he shares immigrants’ “perception” that ICE spreads fear and mistrust just like the KKK.

    The question was carefully constructed. A listener almost certainly believed Sen. Harris was accusing ICE of being like the KKK, while she offered the same qualification that Reedy said was McCarthy’s trademark in questioning.


    “I’m very specific about what I’m asking you,” she said. “Are you aware that there’s a perception that ICE is administering its power in a way that is causing fear and intimidation, particularly among immigrants and specifically among immigrants coming from Mexico and Central America?”

    Keep that verbal construction in your mind for a second, and let’s go back to McCarthy.

    His crusade against communists made him famous, but his lesser-known targets were homosexuals he wanted to root out from government — a campaign historians dubbed as McCarthy’s “lavender scare.” He argued that homosexuals were as dangerous to national security as communists.

    The art of McCarthy’s nuanced insinuation was on full display during a 1952 speech addressing Secretary of State Dean Acheson’s decision to fire 54 gay workers at the State Department.

    “(Acheson) said the State Department is now staffed with good, loyal, clean-living Americans. Well, I don’t quite know what his conception of clean-living Americans happens to be, but, since he made that statement, 54 individuals who had this unusual State Department affliction — homosexuals — were allowed to resign. Fifty-four of those good, clean-living Americans,” McCarthy declared.

    A few seconds later, McCarthy stopped short of calling for gays to be eradicated from State, and instead quoted Sens. Kenneth Wherry (R-Neb.) and J. Lister Hill (D-Ala.): “The question is, why worry about getting those individuals out of the State Department?” McCarthy asked. “I think the answer was given by a committee headed by Sen. Wherry, one of our very able senators who died a few weeks ago, and Sen. Hill — a Democrat and a Republican — and they explained very well why those individuals must not be handling top-secret material.”

    When Harris sought to make a backhanded comparison between ICE and the KKK, she cited a “perception.” When McCarthy tried to tie gays to communists, he cited a “conception.”

    When Harris sought to attribute her concern, she cited a third party: immigrants. When McCarthy attributed his concern, he cited a third party: two fellow senators.

    The rhetorical tactics are as similar as they are offensive.
    Guilt by association or insinuation had no place in the Senate in the 1950s, as lawmakers ultimately realized when they censured McCarthy.
    It has no place in the Senate in 2018, as I hope Harris’s colleagues soon will realize.


    The men and women of ICE don’t operate under white sheets like the KKK members of old. They don badges and bulletproof vests — and assume the risks that come with law enforcement.

    They don’t operate from a mandate of hate like the KKK; they operate under the color of laws dutifully passed by Congress in compliance with the U.S. Constitution.

    And they don’t deserve a U.S. senator’s demonization, any more than the gay Americans of the 1950s did from McCarthy.
    https://thehill.com/opinion/immigrat...of-mccarthyism

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    Miss Harris is an example of what happens when no one checks your IQ level when they approve your application for employment,

    she is nothing but a bitter half black woman that they gave a microphone
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    When Harris sought to make a backhanded comparison between ICE and the KKK, she cited a “perception.”
    When McCarthy tried to tie gays to communists, he cited a “conception.”

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Then don't Vote for her ...

    Problem solved
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,754
    Thanks
    6,477
    Thanked 11,418 Times in 7,537 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    Miss Harris is an example of what happens when no one checks your IQ level when they approve your application for employment,

    she is nothing but a bitter half black woman that they gave a microphone
    Nancy Pelosi, Harris, Mad Maxine. California trifecta of stupidity.
    But you gotta hand it to New Yorkers. Occasional-Cortex beats them all.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anonymoose For This Post:

    anatta (11-19-2018), cancel2 2022 (11-20-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. Kamala Harris draws parallel between ICE and the KKK
    By dukkha in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-17-2018, 06:25 AM
  2. Is Kamala Harris Eligible to be President?
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-20-2018, 10:47 PM
  3. Kamala Harris says she will vote against Gina Haspel
    By dukkha in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 05-11-2018, 10:34 AM
  4. Kamala Harris and the Bernie wing
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-01-2017, 09:52 AM
  5. Kamala Harris and Women's Rights
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-22-2017, 03:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •