Reply With QuoteAnd that will make it happen? Uh huh.Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou
Verified User
Now here's a genius who reloads his own bullets! Oh, he knows what he's doing! Right!
Classical Liberal
And that will make it happen? Uh huh.
Resident Voluntaryist
Those can't be rights if someone can take them away. They are privileges the government that owns you grants you temporarily.
If you believe that man is good, there is no need for government. If you believe that man is bad, you dare not create one.
Classical Liberal
In that case my freedom is a temporary privilege as long as I behave myself therefore I have no rights according to you.
Verified User
Do you really really want this idiot out on the streets playing COP!
I ask you! LOL!
Verified User
I see you're still too fucking lazy and/or stupid to look into the facts about vehicle deaths, dumbfuck.But this was about a comment regarding all of the "regulations" that car owners have to jump through and your inability to explain why there are so many deaths from cars, with all those regulations in place.
And it wasn't a claim that you responded to, illiterate fuck. It was a series of questions.
Verified User
You are the stupidest motherfucker on the forum (and then some) when you keep claiming that cars "cannot be necessary" in a modern society. The right or not, has nothing to do with their necessity. But you're too fucking stupid to realize that.
How do you get to work, idiot? Assuming you do have a job. How does your food get to the market? Fucking wagon train?
I'm not telling anybody how to get to work, you fucking moron. I'm merely saying society comes to a standstill without motorized vehicles and you claim they're just an option.
Yep, stupidest motherfucker around.
Do yourself a favor, shitstain. Quit posting and making a complete fool out of yourself. You'll still be a complete fool, but it won't be so publci.
Classical Liberal
I hate to agree with you but I'm forced to in this case. This guy is obsessed with strict interpretation of what The Founding Fathers deemed necessary in 1776 as etched in stone for eternity and considers that to be libertarian with zero regard for personal responsibility, the cornerstone of libertarian ideals. We don't need or want his kind.You are the stupidest motherfucker on the forum (and then some) when you keep claiming that cars "cannot be necessary" in a modern society. The right or not, has nothing to do with their necessity. But you're too fucking stupid to realize that.
How do you get to work, idiot? Assuming you do have a job. How does your food get to the market? Fucking wagon train?
I'm not telling anybody how to get to work, you fucking moron. I'm merely saying society comes to a standstill without motorized vehicles and you claim they're just an option.
Yep, stupidest motherfucker around.
Do yourself a favor, shitstain. Quit posting and making a complete fool out of yourself. You'll still be a complete fool, but it won't be so publci.
Verified User
I know it pains you, but I won't rub it in.
anonymoose (11-19-2018)
rebel
if you think a simple act of law can be allowed to revoke a right of the people, you're in the wrong fucking country. and yes, if someone commits armed robbery, serves their time, they should have ALL rights restored to them once they are released. If they cant be trusted out in public with a weapon, they cant be trusted in public.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
I either convince everyone to acquit, or hang a jury. either way, it works.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
you're too stupid to realize that for something to be a necessity, you must have a right to it. end of story, dumbest motherfucker on the planet.
I work from home, but that's beside the point, dumbest motherfucker on the planet.
the trucking companies pay a bunch of fees, tags, taxes, and licenses to the government for the PRIVILEGE of conducting interstate/intrastate commerce, but then you should fucking know this, dumbest motherfucker on the planet.How does your food get to the market? Fucking wagon train?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
If you are of the mindset that the constitution must be 'interpreted' according to the times we live in, you're a liberal/conservative, not a libertarian. If you WERE a libertarian, you'd know that personal responsiblity comes with actions, not with prior restraint so you can FEEL safer
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Classical Liberal
Personal responsibility, the cornerstone of libertarianism, seems to not be on your list.
You'd do well to read this:You are a strict Constitutionalist, not a libertarian.A simple example will illuminate this.
Assume a hypothetical country wisely gave its people the freedom to pursue their own happiness however they wished. Over time, these people invented cars and developed roads. The only government interventions were the minimum traffic controls necessary to maintain order on the roads. For a while, people drove their cars responsibly. Everything worked well, and everyone prospered. But then some of the people started to lose their sense of personal responsibility and drive cars that were not properly maintained, or drive in disobedience of the traffic regulations, or drive while intoxicated, or drive with seriously impaired eye sight, or drive while totally distracted by technology gadgets. And of course, accidents, injuries and deaths on the roads increased. In response, the country would have to impose an increasing number of regulations, each of which would further restrict driving freedom. If more and more people chose to drive in this irresponsible way, until the great majority of drivers were irresponsible, there would be utter chaos on the roads. And the government would be forced to take away all freedoms to drive. It might do this by excessive regulation of individual drivers, or even a total elimination of individual drivers or cars.
The Message Is Simple
Freedom without personal responsibility leads to chaos. And chaos invariably leads to the loss of freedom.
http://www.curbrein.com/2016/03/pers...esponsibility/
rebel
wrong, bucko. libertarianism is about freedom that doesn't affect the rights of others. do you think being a libertarian is about dotting the i's and crossing the t's and jumping a bunch of hurdles to make others feel safe?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Posting Rules
Bookmarks