Proof it was all a scam

[Adolf_Twitler]

No it wasn't.

OK! Then you tell me his original question to me!

Jesus Christ! Are you arguing for arguing sake?

Find yourself a fence post to argue with and don't be goofy! Shit Fire Man! For Heaven' Sake! LOL!

[Lightbringer]

OK! Then you tell me his original question to me!

that must mean you condemned the comments of liberals wanting to load the SC with liberal Judges,

Happy?

[Adolf_Twitler]

Happy?

And then I answered with a "YES"

[USFREEDOM911]

Don't you have a Caravan to worry about?

Are you now an EXPERT on caravans??

[USFREEDOM911]

I answered your question!

And I really don't need you to do shit!

But, now that you asked, It would be nice if you'd just STFU and crawl back under whatever rock you came out from! LOL!

No, you did not answer it.
You left a comment; but didn't answer the question.

I'm sorry that your now triggered.

[USFREEDOM911]

His question was "Do I blame Democrats for wanting to load up the Supreme Court with liberals?"

I said, "Yes"!

In fact, I said "Yes! The Supreme Court should be A-Political"

Idiots! I am dealing with idiots here! Idiots that can't even fucking read!

The question was:

Since two wrongs don't make a right; that must mean you condemned the comments of liberals wanting to load the SC with liberal Judges, when they first mentioned it!!

Not the one you wanted to make believe it was.

[Lightbringer]

And then I answered with a "YES"

Boy, you're stupid.

[USFREEDOM911]

And then I answered with a "YES"

No, you said:

Yes, I stand by my original comment!

Our Justice and Judicial Systems must remain A-political!

And your "original comment" was:

Two wrongs never made anything right!

Obama selected Merrick Garland, and he didn't even get a nod by McConnell.

Garland has been on the nomination lists of both Republicans and Democrats for the last 10 years or more.

And he was a shoe in for both parties in getting approved.

And it was only because Garland was such a great nomination, that McConnell didn't want to see go through, because he didn't want Obama to be able to get the credit for Garland's nomination!

Which said nothing about how you condemned JPP liberals for their comments.

[Lightbringer]

Why can't Twitler read?

[USFREEDOM911]

Why can't Twitler read?

He's willfully blind to facts.

[Adolf_Twitler]

Yes, I stand by my original comment!

Our Justice and Judicial Systems must remain A-political!

Here is my original answer to your question! I quoted myself to show you!

I said "Yes"- first word in my response!

Yes, I condemn anyone for thinking they should load up the bench with political hacks! Be it Republicans or Democrats!

And as I previously said- Supreme Court Judges should be A-political! Meaning they should have a decision history of proven A-political decisions.

These answers may not be what you want to hear, and you do not have to agree with my answer, but I answered your question.

Now go and try to make some kind of a mountain out of a molehill with someone else!

[Adolf_Twitler]

No, you said:



And your "original comment" was:



Which said nothing about how you condemned JPP liberals for their comments.

Dude, I don't read every comment in every thread by either Liberals or Conservatives.

So what makes you think I should respond to everyone's comments here in this forum regardless to who and what political party they seem to be with?

Do you read everyone's comments here in every thread? Do you ever correct a Donald Trump supporter's comments about anything?

I mean, how do you know who I'm ignoring and who is ignoring me? I may not even be seeing everyone's comments!

Stop with the insanity, preposterous absurdity, and all your hypocrite shit!

[Frank Apisa]

Here is my original answer to your question! I quoted myself to show you!

I said "Yes"- first word in my response!

Yes, I condemn anyone for thinking they should load up the bench with political hacks! Be it Republicans or Democrats!

And as I previously said- Supreme Court Judges should be A-political! Meaning they should have a decision history of proven A-political decisions.

These answers may not be what you want to hear, and you do not have to agree with my answer, but I answered your question.

Now go and try to make some kind of a mountain out of a molehill with someone else!

You answered the question. This guys is just being a jerk-off for some reason.

These guys who think they have constructed brilliant question...get all bent out of shape when the question is answered in a way they did not want it answered. And their supporters do the same thing.

That is what you are up against here.

[Anarchon]

Goddam near all of them.

Here are a few that are receiving special treatment by the abomination:

The free press.

Various intelligence agencies.

Department of Justice.

The military.

The spirit of the emoluments clause.

You have a fucked up idea of what freedom is.

[domer76]

It has been over a month since the left proclaimed from the roof tops that “a rapist can’t serve on the Supreme Court”

Well Kavanaugh is on the court and left doesn’t talk about Kavanaugh anymore. Why is that?

Are they now OK with someone they believe to be a rapist being on the court?

Or

Did they not really believe it to begin with? Was it all a staged political tactic meant solely to derail his nomination.

This is another problem I have with NeverTrumpers. If they would have gotten their way Kavanaugh would have been destroyed by the left.

Would a President Romney have gone to the mattresses for Kavanaugh? Not a fucking chance. The fucking squish didn’t even have the balls to defend himself

Would McShamnesty? No

Kasich? No

But Trump had the balls and we prevailed.

I'll talk about Kavanaugh. I don't know about the rapist part, but he is a perjuring drunk.

Is perjury a good enough reason to keep him off the bench?

Trump has no balls. He's a pathologically lying piece of human feces.