Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Aerospike Engines - Why Aren't We Using them Now?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default Aerospike Engines - Why Aren't We Using them Now?


  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    This is a very fascinating subject, but apathy reigns as per usual on JPP.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,342
    Thanks
    13,672
    Thanked 12,252 Times in 7,662 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,055 Times in 1,002 Posts

    Default

    Maybe if you included some content in your OP...rather than asking people to watch 15 minutes of tape that might be nothing but bullshit...

    ...you'd get better reaction.

    You've watched the tape. Tell us what you've got to say. Otherwise sit here and talk to yourself. (Hope my comment gives your thread a boost.)

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Maybe if you included some content in your OP...rather than asking people to watch 15 minutes of tape that might be nothing but bullshit...

    ...you'd get better reaction.

    You've watched the tape. Tell us what you've got to say. Otherwise sit here and talk to yourself. (Hope my comment gives your thread a boost.)
    Oh dear, so you have to watch a video ffs!

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Oh dear, so you have to watch a video ffs!
    maybe you need to watch also, honey bunny, but it may be just a bit technical for you. Best you go back and make some cookies.

  6. The Following User Groans At floridafan For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (11-16-2018)

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,342
    Thanks
    13,672
    Thanked 12,252 Times in 7,662 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,055 Times in 1,002 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Oh dear, so you have to watch a video ffs!
    No I do not, actually.

    Haven't...and won't.

    I seldom do when someone is so lazy they just post a video without a reasonable OP accompanying.

    My guess is lots of people do that.

    Why not stop being lazy...if you have a point you think is worth making?

  8. The Following User Groans At Frank Apisa For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (11-16-2018)

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    No I do not, actually.

    Haven't...and won't.

    I seldom do when someone is so lazy they just post a video without a reasonable OP accompanying.

    My guess is lots of people do that.

    Why not stop being lazy...if you have a point you think is worth making?
    If you don't want to watch it, then up to you! I know about them already, you don't.

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    maybe you need to watch also, honey bunny, but it may be just a bit technical for you. Best you go back and make some cookies.
    This from the fool that thought the video about palm oil was made in Iceland ffs!!

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    If you don't want to watch it, then up to you! I know about them already, you don't.
    I'll just say this, aerospike engines are far more efficient than rocket engines with conical nozzles. They were intended to be used to power single stage to orbit craft after the Space Shuttle, but are in a state of hiatus at present.

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Aerospikes are generalist engines. But staging usually makes more sense, you can use engines that are more efficient in space, and launcher engines that are more effective in atmospheric conditions. Aerospikes would mainly be useful for an SSTO, because they'd remain recently efficient at all altitudes. but an SSTO in general has been sort of the white whale of the space industry. Also it's kind of pointless now that we have reusable staged rockets.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  13. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    He kind of brushed over the x-33. The problem with SSTO's is that it's just marginally possible for them to fly themselves into space and carry any useful amount of cargo. It hurts a great deal to have to carry around a tank at all times. The X-33 tried to develop a novel new lightweight tank, but ultimately it still weighed so much that it couldn't carry any cargo into orbit, it would've only barely been able to lift itself into orbit empty and return. Clearly that is entirely useless. And that's what winds up happening with most SSTO's.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  14. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by We Don't Do Vegetables View Post
    Aerospikes are generalist engines. But staging usually makes more sense, you can use engines that are more efficient in space, and launcher engines that are more effective in atmospheric conditions. Aerospikes would mainly be useful for an SSTO, because they'd remain recently efficient at all altitudes. but an SSTO in general has been sort of the white whale of the space industry. Also it's kind of pointless now that we have reusable staged rockets.
    There is nothing to stop multi-stage vehicles from using aerospike engines, at least for the first stage. In general a space vehicle fitted with an aerospike engine uses 25–30% less fuel at low altitudes. The Space Shuttle was going to use aerospike engines but was decided against reasons that are still clouded in mystery.

    ARCA is carrying on the good work.

    http://www.arcaspace.com/
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 11-17-2018 at 05:20 AM.

  15. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    The first stage is the part of the rocket where efficiency actually matters *least* though, in terms of delta v (the total ability of the rocket to change its velocity). Like they intentionally use low isp, high thrust engines based on kerosene in the lower stage just to save on volume in most cases (which is much denser, but less efficient, than the hydrogen often used at higher stages). I can totally see why they wouldn't want to bother with an aerospike there, if it was just a little bit more unreliable or produced less thrust it likely wouldn't be worth it.

    Whereas in the upper stage, efficiency increasingly becomes totally critical. Once in orbit you have all the time in the world to change your velocity, so you don't care as much about thrust. But every tiny little bit of extra fuel, requires many times that amount of fuel in the lower stages just to carry it into space.

    The extreme version of this of course is the ion engine. Which provides about as much thrust as the force of a piece of paper falling on your hand, but has an isp like 10x anything you can get via chemical means. So it can send things very far out into space given enough time. Unfortunately if it were carrying humans the mass would be too much, it would take years and years to get anywhere and we simply can't wait that much time.

    Aerospikes are definitely they are a cool technology though.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  16. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    This is a very fascinating subject, but apathy reigns as per usual on JPP.
    You draw that out in people.

  17. The Following User Groans At Fentoine Lum For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (11-17-2018)

  18. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Tbh mainly all I know about aerospikes is that when I designed rockets with them in Kerbal Space Program, and calculated the delta-v of the resulting vehicle, it never helped out. Almost always there were better alternatives. I did once design an SSTO, but I went for SABRE type engines for that (which are *much* more efficient than aerospikes *while there's enough oxygen in the air for them to combust*), as well as an airplane type liftoff. Maybe I'll try again with an aerospike design.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

Similar Threads

  1. If you aren't responsible enough to own a gun until 21
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 03-28-2018, 11:48 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-27-2013, 08:13 AM
  3. America's Engines Revving in 2013
    By Minister of Truth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-15-2013, 11:27 PM
  4. Shock wave puts hybrid engines in a spin
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-17-2011, 05:03 PM
  5. Aren't you lucky?
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 07:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •