Question for JPP lefties - no thread ban

[LV426]

Define "interfered" and provide proof. Mueller may need your help, after two years, he has none

Fact is, you don't know what Mueller has.

No one does because Mueller doesn't leak.

And every time you post something like this, it just lets everyone know how insecure in this you are, and that when this evidence is presented, you will be emotionally incapable of handling it, and that will likely manifest itself in a violent act, like all right-wingers end up doing.

[Oneuli]

Define "interfered" and provide proof.

Sure. They used money to influence the outcome of the election. See the links I provided earlier in the thread about Russian Facebook ad buys used to influence the election.

Mueller may need your help, after two years, he has none.

Actually, as you'll recall, he's made multiple indictments of Russians -- Putin just won't extradite them to face trial, and Trump is too much under Putin's control to exert any pressure.

She did not win the majority required for the Electoral college.

It's true that the Electoral College's members chose to ignore the will of the American People and instead installed Trump in the presidency.

Obama was re-elected by the slimmest margin of any sitting President in history.

Incorrect. Obama won 51.1% to 47.2% against Romney. Bush, in 2004, won by 50.7% to 48.3%. That makes Obama's margin 62.5% larger than Bush's. So, we literally only have to go back to the prior sitting president to find out you're wrong. Obama also got a far larger electoral margin in 2012 than Bush did in 2004.

[LV426]

Had she won 50 million votes in LA county, she still wouldn't be President. he did not win the majority required for the Electoral colle

Not sure "we won on a technicality" is a great campaign slogan for 2020.

Also, when you hang your hat on the electoral college, you wash away any electoral mandate you think you got. It actually makes your arguments weaker because you're admitting you lack popular support for your policies.

So congrats on doing the thing we've been trying to do; undermine your credibility and base of support.

[LV426]

Incorrect. Obama won 51.1% to 47.2% against Romney. Bush, in 2004, won by 50.7% to 48.3%. That makes Obama's margin 62.5% larger than Bush's. So, we literally only have to go back to the prior sitting president to find out you're wrong. Obama also got a far larger electoral margin in 2012 than Bush did in 2004.

Ouch. That stings.

[Old Trapper]

If it were not for the reality that so many others share your intellectual, and mental, handicap you could be the poster boy for the low IQ right wing voter.

Define "interfered" and provide proof. Mueller may need your help, after two years, he has none.

That is one of the problems when you have to deal with such a secretive country as is Russia, and then try to get its cooperation. But the low IQ types never consider what has been proven, or accomplished:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...ction-hacking/

Had she won 50 million votes in LA county, she still wouldn't be President.

She did not win the majority required for the Electoral college.

So that negates the reality that her superior numbers prove that Trump was not Ameirca's choice, just that of the elitists? If she had won 75,000 more votes in three key States we would not have to put up with the senile pervert you preferred.

https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-...chigan-updated

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Because it was all a hoax. How stupid does that feel?

Again, are you really claiming there was NO Russian interference in 2016?

[canceled.2021.1]

I don't know.

If they did, it was not very effective as the Nationalists did not do very well,

No suspicions? So you only suspect it when your side loses?

Makes sense. Thanks for admitting that