https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ser-gun-charge
Read the first sentence of the article you dumb nigger loving cunt.
Maybe he'll be the one that gets you.
Well, as you'll recall, it wasn't so much a question as a snippet of declarative gibberish: "Appears to me as if you believe a law is immoral the rest of the country should do so." I'm doing my best to respond to it as if it were a meaningful question. What I'm saying is that my belief about whether a law is immoral or not isn't the important thing. It either is or it isn't. If it isn't immoral, then I ought to change my assumption that it is. If it is immoral, then everyone who disagrees ought to change their assumptions that it isn't.
Again, it was not a question. It was a declarative statement: "Appears to me as if you believe a law is immoral the rest of the country should do so." If there's some question you would like to ask, feel free. Or are you simply looking for a confirmation of your statement? If so (and if we translate it from the original gibberish and into the form I provided it), then I suppose that it's accurate to say that if I have taken a position that a law is immoral, that I must believe it to be so, and if I am correct, then those who believe otherwise ought to change their positions.
Bookmarks