Sorry, what do I search for? You have written many posts about the 14th.
It would only take a short sentence to summarize your view of the original intent of the 14th Amendment. You could have written that sentence in less time than you spent complaining that I won't look it up. You seem too afraid or lazy to give us a concise description of your views.
The one where the question was answered.
The sentence with the answer is short. You could have looked it up in a shorter time than it took to ask the same question that has already been answered. Since it's already been answered, your claim of fear is been determined to be untrue. Since it's been answered and you refuse to look, it proves you're lazy.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Plessy v. Ferguson?
Since many states had segregation laws for many years, are you claiming those laws were unconstitutional? If so, are you saying there are no checks in the Constitution to prevent states from acting unconstitutionally?
Because that is what CFM is basing his argument on. You claim the 14th is clearly written. I agree--it says anybody born in the U. S. is a citizen and that has been the law followed ever since.
CFM says it does not mean what it says because that was not the "original intent." But, I can't get him to explain the original intent. He says he already did, but he has hidden it somewhere.
Yes there are. The Supreme Court is but one avenue. They failed to act in a constitutional manner. The Supreme Court is the one that violated the Constitution with that ruling.
There is also the other States, who also own the Constitution.
There is also Congress, which failed to act.
There is also the President and the Dept of Justice, which failed to act.
Bookmarks