Forgotten failed DEMOCRAT tool's lawyers hit with complaints

[Legion]

UGLY AS SIN, AND NOW ABANDONED BY DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEIR PLOY FAILED

Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Debra S. Katz, Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee during the hearings on the nomination of the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh.

According to the Judicial Watch complaint, by not informing their client Dr. Ford that Sen. Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee offered in a letter to “fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford… in California, or anywhere else, to obtain (her) testimony,” Katz, Banks, and Bromwich violated the following District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct:

Rule l.4(a) – A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.

Rule 1.4(b) – A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.

This is going to turn ugly against the radical leftist attorneys representing Ford but this may only be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to who else used Ford in the construct of the Kavanaugh lynching.

It was Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, who violated the ethics of the Senate by originally recommending Debra Katz to Ford and then sitting on Ford’s letter for 45 days.


http://entrepreneursays.com/2018/10/20/it-begins-official-bar-complaint-filed-against-christine-fords-attorneys-charging-them-with-2-counts-of-misconduct/

[Jade Dragon]

Try a less babbling title, and a real source. I coudn't understand the title, and I stopped reading after Judicial Watch.

[Legion]

Try a less babbling title, and a real source. I coudn't understand the title, and I stopped reading after Judicial Watch.

Yet here you are. Once Ford's smear tactics failed, you and the other FEMOCRATS forgot her completely, didn't you?

Now it's on to Khashoggi. You'll forget him, too.

I can't wait until the left pretends to care about the woman and/or child that gets killed next week on the border.

[volsrock]

Yet here you are. Once Ford's smear tactics failed, you and the other FEMOCRATS forgot her completely, didn't you?

Now it's on to Khashoggi. You'll forget him, too.

I can't wait until the left pretends to care about the woman and/or child that gets killed next week on the border.

Moore accusers forgotten

Ford forgotten

[Legion]

Moore accusers forgotten

Ford forgotten

Before long, Khashoggi forgotten. The failed tools of leftist smear campaigns...

[anonymoose]

I know this is late but I pondered the "attempted rape " bs.
She never claimed Kav even tried to disrobe her in any way. How does one attempt rape without even attempting to take off the rapee's cloths?
Complete and utter bull shit.

[Sailor]

I know this is late but I pondered the "attempted rape " bs.
She never claimed Kav even tried to disrobe her in any way. How does one attempt rape without even attempting to take off the rapee's cloths?
Complete and utter bull shit.

The claim was sexual misconduct. Democrats quickly escalated that to rape. How else would they get their base to listen?

[anonymoose]

[CENTER]

UGLY AS SIN


http://entrepreneursays.com/2018/10/20/it-begins-official-bar-complaint-filed-against-christine-fords-attorneys-charging-them-with-2-counts-of-misconduct/

Hard to believe she's the same age as my wife. Looks like a bad 70ish to me.

[anonymoose]

The claim was sexual misconduct. Democrats quickly escalated that to rape. How else would they get their base to listen?

Graham was right to be incensed. As was Kav.
BTW, I didn't renew my Time subscription for the office. It's gotten as bad as the NYT. The Economist will take it's place.

[Sailor]

Graham was right to be incensed. As was Kav.
BTW, I didn't renew my Time subscription for the office. It's gotten as bad as the NYT. The Economist will take it's place.

Good choice on the Economist. All people should be incensed as to what happened there. It could easily happen to them in today's clueless, social media society.

[Centerleftfl]

UGLY AS SIN, AND NOW ABANDONED BY DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEIR PLOY FAILED

Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Debra S. Katz, Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee during the hearings on the nomination of the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh.

According to the Judicial Watch complaint, by not informing their client Dr. Ford that Sen. Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee offered in a letter to “fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford… in California, or anywhere else, to obtain (her) testimony,” Katz, Banks, and Bromwich violated the following District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct:

Rule l.4(a) – A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.

Rule 1.4(b) – A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.

This is going to turn ugly against the radical leftist attorneys representing Ford but this may only be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to who else used Ford in the construct of the Kavanaugh lynching.

It was Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, who violated the ethics of the Senate by originally recommending Debra Katz to Ford and then sitting on Ford’s letter for 45 days.


http://entrepreneursays.com/2018/10/20/it-begins-official-bar-complaint-filed-against-christine-fords-attorneys-charging-them-with-2-counts-of-misconduct/

JUDICIAL WATCH? And WTH is entrepreneursays??

When I put in ENTREPRENEUR SAYS in the search box for media source bias, BREITBART pops up!!

[Sailor]

JUDICIAL WATCH? And WTH is entrepreneursays??

When I put in ENTREPRENEUR SAYS in the search box for media source bias, BREITBART pops up!!

ONE google search was all it took.... http://entrepreneursays.com/2018/10/...of-misconduct/

[Centerleftfl]

Graham was right to be incensed. As was Kav.
BTW, I didn't renew my Time subscription for the office. It's gotten as bad as the NYT. The Economist will take it's place.

THEATER!!! Bad acting to boot! GRAHAM was 'auditioning' for AG. Frankly, I have ZERO idea why he would even want under this regime.

[Legion]

A month from now, will any liberals even remember Christine Ford?

Jamal Khashoggi?

[Legion]

TFW DEMOCRATS FORGET YOU AS SOON AS YOUR USEFULNESS IS OVER