Why We Need Gun Restrictions

[Rune]

Stand your ground does not apply to this case as surveillance video and eyewitness reports seem to indicate the shopowner's life was never in any danger. The court will likely rule as such. Self-defense was the purpose of that law, the purpose was not so shopowners can play judge, jury, and executioner for petty crimes. So...I fail to see, first of all, how this case is a valid argument against stand your ground laws nor how it is a a valid argument in favor of more gun restrictions. This man will likely be going to prison, that is the current law functioning the way it's supposed to. And in favor of the victim in question.

Had the thief been wielding and brandishing a weapon, that'd be different and frankly the shopowner should have the legal right to self-defense in that event.

The thief was wielding a hatchet.

[countryboy]

Mandatory background check for one. Making "bump stocks" illegal for another instead of allowing the NRA to sell them. Most of those 20,000 laws are only for specific areas, and do not apply to all areas. Then you have areas like Florida with its phony ass "stand your ground" laws. In this case the prosecuting attorney says the law does not apply:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/city-offic...ry?id=58629913

Can you tell us exactly how the incident in you OP would've been prevented by mandatory background checks? Please be specific, and detailed. Tell us exactly what, in the shop owner's background would've prevented him from having a firearm, and using it in such an irresponsible manner.

Also, could you please link us to the NRA website which has bump stocks for sale.

Oh and yeah, banning bump stocks will solve the problem.



I think what we really need are restrictions on left wing loons.

[countryboy]

There is such thing as left wing fascism you fucking retard.

That's the point. Who's the fucking retard?

[Rune]

That's the point. Who's the fucking retard?

Ralph but you are looking good too.

[countryboy]

The thief was wielding a hatchet.

He wasn't exactly wielding it. He was holding it by the head, and trying to escape. Had he been wielding it, and threatening the shop owner, then deadly force would've certainly been justified. In this case, it just wasn't. Here's a good analysis of the incident.

[countryboy]

Ralph but you are looking good too.

You agreed with Ralph, and then called him a retard.

[countryboy]

And I can link to several where a "good guy" killed like 50+ from the 32nd. story of a Las Vegas hotel. Or where another "good guy" killed 20 plus high school students. How about the "good guy" that killed a shop lifter.

No, you can't. I don't think you have a grasp on the whole good guy/bad guy thing. Perhaps you could ask the nurse for some help.

[domer76]

and we're all laughed out at your idiotic stances on everything. there is no logic in you at all. worthless.

Hey, pussy. Have you taken your pissant popgun down to the courthouse to demonstrate your right to carry anywhere?

^This is from the idiot who claims “vehicles cannot be necessary” for a modern society to function. Here he is, going to work.

[domer76]

if i'm walking down the street carrying my gun, i'm safer. if my wife is walking down the street with me and she's carrying her gun, now i'm even safer and so is she.

i just proved your theory wrong.

You didn’t prove shit. You and your stupid wife are more likely to be harmed by your popguns than helped by them.

Moron

[Celticguy]

Question is do you, and if you do then why are so many on the right using the Second as a defense for killing others?

Theyre not.
The right to keep and bare arms simply expands ones ability to defend ones life and property. Law sets the parameters for deadly force.
Rights and behaviors as i said.

[domer76]

Can you tell us exactly how the incident in you OP would've been prevented by mandatory background checks? Please be specific, and detailed. Tell us exactly what, in the shop owner's background would've prevented him from having a firearm, and using it in such an irresponsible manner.

Also, could you please link us to the NRA website which has bump stocks for sale.

Oh and yeah, banning bump stocks will solve the problem.



I think what we really need are restrictions on left wing loons.

^More simplistic, binary thinking from a barrel-stroking simpleton.

[Celticguy]

^More simplistic, binary thinking from a barrel-stroking simpleton.

If you cannot answer just say so.

[Rune]

You agreed with Ralph, and then called him a retard.

No, I have never agreed with Ralph.
Read much?

[countryboy]

There is such thing as left wing fascism you fucking retard.

No, I have never agreed with Ralph.
Read much?

Yes, all the time. You, evidently not so much.

[Rune]

Yes, all the time. You, evidently not so much.

Misprint.