Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 101

Thread: Trump broke through the moralistic BS of American foreign policy

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    23,520
    Thanks
    3,064
    Thanked 9,761 Times in 7,265 Posts
    Groans
    49
    Groaned 1,060 Times in 1,005 Posts

    Default

    This message is hidden because Legion is on your ignore list.

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    the nation building afterwards especially in AfPak was morality driven.
    But I agree there was also counter-terrorism at play there too.
    we should have stuck with Whack A Mole instead of nationbuilding there.

    you don't understand that realpolitik is the same as a transactional foreign policy.
    It's not a "19th century dead concept"wherever you got that from

    You don't understand why we went into Libya -the Albright operative phrase kicking around the UN then was
    " responsibility to protect" (R2P). it was a 100% moral justification to join in their civil war.

    we can still espouse democratic values -but not as a driving force for policy
    You don't get to decide this you arrogant fuckstick.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Because we don't deal with China as a human rights abuser ( you forgot the Uigers / Xinjiang reeducation camps)
    we deal with them as a malign military power and global hegemon, and as a trade partner
    None of which makes them a good example.=
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  4. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Donald Trump, for all of the man's considerable faults, may well end up doing a bit of good — by forcing defenders of America's bipartisan foreign policy consensus to reflect critically on the foolishness that so often follows from their moralistic assumptions.

    The president views international relations in transactional terms. Those who are most committed to a highly moralized version of American foreign policy find this offensive and like to describe it as amoral or even anti-moral. But the source of the objection isn't immediately obvious. In any transaction, one balances one's own good against those on the other side. The goal is gaining advantage for oneself. When an American president deals with the other nations of the world, we should hope and assume that he's doing so with the overriding aim of advancing the good of the United States.

    Yet a significant segment of elite opinion in the United States is exceedingly uncomfortable with thinking in such self-interested terms.
    Instead, these opinion-makers believe the U.S. should think of itself as a moral actor using its military and economic power for noble ends. That sounds nice, and if the U.S. were an individual human being, it might well lead to acts of admirable, heroic self-sacrifice. But political communities are not individuals. Their elected leaders cannot escape the need to justify their actions on the world stage in terms of how they benefit the country — whose citizens fund and die in the wars the moralists so nobly justify.

    This conflict between pursuing the good of the nation and the good of the world at large produces the moralistic muddle that is American foreign policy, with the U.S. constantly conflating what's good for itself with what's good for our allies with what's good for those in foreign countries suffering from poverty and oppression with what's good for the world as a whole.

    It was this muddle that convinced leading figures from both parties that overthrowing the government of Saddam Hussein would be a splendid idea for everyone concerned — for the U.S., for Israel, for the Iraqi people, for the Greater Middle East, and for global order more generally. This turned out to be wrong in just about every single respect.

    Very similar, if less catastrophic, mistakes have led the U.S. to expend blood and treasure in Afghanistan for a stupefying 17 years and counting. They led Barack Obama to reproduce the errors of Iraq in Libya. They've led leading politicians and pundits to spend much of the last six years clamoring for the U.S. to intervene more forcefully in the Syrian civil war.

    Over and over again the same arguments are made:
    Something bad is happening; we need to do something about it militarily; doing something about it is automatically in our interests, because our interests can't possibly clash with our values (or vice versa); if we fail to do something about it, then anything bad that transpires after our refusal to act can be attributed to our failure of nerve; and finally, if we act and things turn out badly (as they nearly always do), this is merely a product of faulty execution, which can and will be fixed the next time, and never a consequence of the overriding moral imperative (to do something) itself.

    It is this string of faulty assumptions that Trump's amoral transactionalism promises to break.

    Now, it's true that Trump could easily stumble into new wars due to incompetence. And there's no denying he's continued the wars he inherited; we're still in Afghanistan, and still funding Saudi Arabia's proxy war with Iran in Yemen. But so far, at least, there are no new Iraqs or Libyas on the horizon. And that's a very encouraging development.

    For the first time in a very long time, the man occupying the Oval Office appears to be almost totally unmoved by moral appeals in dealing with the rest of the world. That understandably troubles many, and if it motivated him to launch wars of outright plunder (to "take the oil" perhaps), it would be a cause for serious concern and stringent opposition.

    But the stark and troubling fact is that the U.S. has an extremely bad habit of starting wars (and spreading chaos and bloodshed) with the very best of moral intentions. If Trump can help us to break that habit, laying the foundations for a foreign policy grounded in greater realism and restraint, it will be a very good thing indeed.
    http://theweek.com/articles/802111/h...foreign-policy
    A global expansion of the GOP mantra:

    "I got mine, you can go FUCK yourself".

    I mean, who cares if human beings on the other side of the planet are being slaughtered as long as we are okay?

    Heartless and selfish.
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  5. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    A global expansion of the GOP mantra:

    "I got mine, you can go FUCK yourself".

    I mean, who cares if human beings on the other side of the planet are being slaughtered as long as we are okay?

    Heartless and selfish.
    Yup. You can go fuck yourself. Literally

  6. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    A global expansion of the GOP mantra:

    "I got mine, you can go FUCK yourself".

    I mean, who cares if human beings on the other side of the planet are being slaughtered as long as we are okay?

    Heartless and selfish.
    because our wars of interventionism have gone so well?

    absent that do what we do with China and the rest of the bad actors ; realpolitik

  7. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,779
    Thanks
    35,457
    Thanked 50,277 Times in 27,090 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    no more mindless interventionism -realpolitik instead. Trump's genius is "America First" policy
    Trump supported invading Iraq.
    Trump supported the Libya intervention.
    Trump expanded our military intervention in Afghanistan.
    Trump expanded our military footprint in Syria and committed us to an open-ended intervention there.
    Trump has been heard repeatedly asking staff about the possibility of invading Venezuela.

  8. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Creeper View Post
    Trump supported invading Iraq.
    Trump supported the Libya intervention.
    Trump expanded our military intervention in Afghanistan.
    Trump expanded our military footprint in Syria and committed us to an open-ended intervention there.
    Trump has been heard repeatedly asking staff about the possibility of invading Venezuela.
    You harass and stalk women. Why should anyone listen to you?

  9. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,513
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,556 Times in 17,086 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    America "the shining light on the hill" should be just as cold, ruthless and immoral as Russia and middle east countries. Ok, if that is what you aspire to, have at it. I want more. I really think we should try to a higher level of ethics and morality. Rightys say, I am a religious person who does not give a shit about other people. Kill them if it feels good or is convenient. For Repubs the idea of America the ethical and moral standard is gone. I know we did mostly lip service to that, but I still wanted us to be different. people from all over admired the American ideals. Forgetaboutit.

  10. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nerdberg View Post
    America "the shining light on the hill" should be just as cold, ruthless and immoral as Russia and middle east countries. Ok, if that is what you aspire to, have at it. I want more. I really think we should try to a higher level of ethics and morality. Rightys say, I am a religious person who does not give a shit about other people. Kill them if it feels good or is convenient. For Repubs the idea of America the ethical and moral standard is gone. I know we did mostly lip service to that, but I still wanted us to be different. people from all over admired the American ideals. Forgetaboutit.
    You really think America is more 'moral' than any other nation? You poor, deluded sap.

  11. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,667
    Thanks
    6,593
    Thanked 12,128 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

  12. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Meanwhile, Meng Hongwei - the head of Interpol - vanished in China under very sketchy circumstances and liberals couldn't care less.

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/19/asia/...ntl/index.html

  13. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,667
    Thanks
    6,593
    Thanked 12,128 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    America "the shining light on the hill" should be just as cold, ruthless and immoral as Russia and middle east countries. Ok, if that is what you aspire to, have at it. I want more. I really think we should try to a higher level of ethics and morality. Rightys say, I am a religious person who does not give a shit about other people. Kill them if it feels good or is convenient. For Repubs the idea of America the ethical and moral standard is gone. I know we did mostly lip service to that, but I still wanted us to be different. people from all over admired the American ideals. Forgetaboutit.
    I agree with much of this. But we got the bill of rights right. That's something.

  14. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,513
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,556 Times in 17,086 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    You really think America is more 'moral' than any other nation? You poor, deluded sap.
    I knew reading was tough for you. Ask your, kid, to explain it to you. You poor illiterate child.

  15. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    I agree with much of this. But we got the bill of rights right. That's something.
    The greatest political document ever devised.

    Liberals think it applies to foreigners. They're wrong.

Similar Threads

  1. So much for Trump's foreign policy accomplishment
    By Micawber in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 171
    Last Post: 05-25-2018, 09:43 AM
  2. Anyone figured out what President Trump's foreign policy is yet?
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 06-29-2017, 09:51 AM
  3. Trump's foreign policy speech
    By Cancel 2020.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 254
    Last Post: 04-29-2016, 11:32 AM
  4. Trump talk: his foreign policy speech
    By Legion Troll in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-28-2016, 02:37 PM
  5. Trump talk: his foreign policy speech
    By Lumberjack in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-28-2016, 01:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •