Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: $1 million dna fake news

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default $1 million dna fake news

    The destroy Trump media keeps taking Trump's hypothetical dna deal out of context in order to spread fake news. Trump never extended a dna deal to pocahontas, he only discussed the possibility of making it at some point in the future.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The "dna deal" was contextualized by Trump himself.

    If Warren could prove she had American Indian ancestry, he would pay 1mm to a charity of her choosing.

    Once again, the Orange Doofus is welshing.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    kudzu (10-20-2018)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    The "dna deal" was contextualized by Trump himself.

    If Warren could prove she had American Indian ancestry, he would pay 1mm to a charity of her choosing.

    Once again, the Orange Doofus is welshing.
    Is that what he is quoted as saying?

    Also, all she proved is that she is 1/1024 Mexican, Peruvian or Columbian

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Lightbringer (10-18-2018)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    The "dna deal" was contextualized by Trump himself. ...
    Indeed. Look at what Trump says at 1 minute mark in the video. He says: "let's say I'm debating Pocahontas..." This is where he sets a hypothetical setting for some point in the future. Also, note that he is not addressing her, he is talking about her to his crowd.

    Now, look at the 1:25 mark in the video. "and in the middle of the debate,..." Here, he is describing the proposed time in the hypothetical debate where he would "toss her a kit". Note that this is only a hypothetical debate that has not occurred, and that he has not made any commitments to Pocahontas. He has only joked with his rally crowd about what he might do in a hypothetical debate in the future.

    [/QUOTE]
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The Trump lemmings keep leaping off the cliff.

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,510
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,554 Times in 17,084 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Is that what he is quoted as saying?

    Also, all she proved is that she is 1/1024 Mexican, Peruvian or Columbian
    Not true. From 1/64th to 1.1024. there was a range and you dishonestly took the highest number to back a false claim. It proves she has Indian heritage, whatever the percentage is.That was what she said and what she proved.
    That Peruvian thing also proves you inerrant dishonesty. The native American tribes do not put their DNA in the commonly accessible places. They keep it private. However the other ones are able to prove Indian heritage since they have a similar or identical DNA.you are grasping, grasping, grasping all the time to work backwards from your preconception. Shameful as always.
    Last edited by Nordberg; 10-18-2018 at 12:43 PM.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Not true. From 1/64th to 1.1024. there was a range and you dishonestly took the highest number to back a false claim. It proves she has Indian heritage, whatever the percentage is.That was what she said and what she proved.
    That Peruvian thing also proves you inerrant dishonesty. The native American tribes do not put their DNA in the commonly accessible places. They keep it private. However the other ones are able to prove Indian heritage since they have a similar or identical DNA.oiu are grasping, grasping, grasping all the time to work backwards from your preconception. Shameful as always.
    In the hypothetical dna test that Trump recently spoke of in a rally, Trump indicated that the test was specifically to find out, in her words, "if it shows you're an Indian". The test was not to find out if she had 1/1000th % Native American blood like most people have, it was just to find out if she was in fact an Indian. Why on earth are lefties defending that the white Pocahontas has a 1/1000% Indian in her blood? She does not have enough of the scarce trace of Indian to make her anything even close to being an Indian, so why defend this 1/1000% trace of Indian that is less than the average non Indian has? Nobody on either side of the aisle believes she is an Indian, and everybody knows that 1/1000% trace Indian means she is NOT an Indian, and that she has no business touting her Native American Heritage.

    At the 2:13 mark, Trump says "if it shows you're an Indian"

    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    The destroy Trump media keeps taking Trump's hypothetical dna deal out of context in order to spread fake news. Trump never extended a dna deal to pocahontas, he only discussed the possibility of making it at some point in the future.
    Drool

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    Indeed. Look at what Trump says at 1 minute mark in the video. He says: "let's say I'm debating Pocahontas..." This is where he sets a hypothetical setting for some point in the future. Also, note that he is not addressing her, he is talking about her to his crowd.

    Now, look at the 1:25 mark in the video. "and in the middle of the debate,..." Here, he is describing the proposed time in the hypothetical debate where he would "toss her a kit". Note that this is only a hypothetical debate that has not occurred, and that he has not made any commitments to Pocahontas. He has only joked with his rally crowd about what he might do in a hypothetical debate in the future.

    [/QUOTE]

    Recently.
    Last edited by domer76; 10-18-2018 at 12:51 PM.

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,510
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,554 Times in 17,084 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    In the hypothetical dna test that Trump recently spoke of in a rally, Trump indicated that the test was specifically to find out, in her words, "if it shows you're an Indian". The test was not to find out if she had 1/1000th % Native American blood like most people have, it was just to find out if she was in fact an Indian. Why on earth are lefties defending that the white Pocahontas has a 1/1000% Indian in her blood? She does not have enough of the scarce trace of Indian to make her anything even close to being an Indian, so why defend this 1/1000% trace of Indian that is less than the average non Indian has? Nobody on either side of the aisle believes she is an Indian, and everybody knows that 1/1000% trace Indian means she is NOT an Indian, and that she has no business touting her Native American Heritage.

    At the 2:13 mark, Trump says "if it shows you're an Indian"

    He challenged her and she responded. She did not have to be there.Now you have to define the facts away. I have no Indian blood, so she is an Indian compared to me, because she has Indian in her DNA. That makes her partly Indian. The inescapable fact is she has 5 Indian genomes. yep, Indian blood. Don't worry, Trump is as big a weasel as you are. He doesn't pay his bets. He will slink off . I suppose his bet was not notarized, you can go there next. Weasel.

  13. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    She should sue him for the $1,000,000 and let the courts decide. I would if I thought somebody owed me $1,000,000 and had the means to pay up.
    In Trump's mind and the vast majority of the medias opinion, including the left, including the Boston Globe, including the NYT, she took Trumps bait and was had, big time.
    Pretty stupid move.
    This is why she's not who I'd nominate if I were a dim and want to defeat him. All Trumps adversaries try to play his game, on his playing field and all end up losing. Warren just showed she'd do the same.
    .

  14. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    He challenged her and she responded.
    Wrong. Trump was only talking about the hypothetical dna test with the rally crowd. Look at what Trump says at 1 minute mark in the video. He says: "let's say I'm debating Pocahontas..." This is where he sets a hypothetical setting for some point in the future. Also, note that he is not addressing her, he is talking about her to his crowd.




    She did not have to be there.
    Correct. She wasn't.

    Now you have to define the facts away.
    The facts are in the video, I just pointed them out.


    I have no Indian blood, so she is an Indian compared to me, because she has Indian in her DNA. That makes her partly Indian. The inescapable fact is she has 5 Indian genomes. yep, Indian blood. Don't worry, Trump is as big a weasel as you are. He doesn't pay his bets. He will slink off . I suppose his bet was not notarized, you can go there next. Weasel.
    Pocahontas is a white chick who tried to claim American Indian Heritage that she had absolutely no business claiming. The only thing she has any business claiming is being remarkably white.




    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  15. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Drool
    Wow, such a clever comment.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  16. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    Wow, such a clever comment.
    That's a compliment for you, lying fool.

  17. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Not true. From 1/64th to 1.1024. there was a range and you dishonestly took the highest number to back a false claim. It proves she has Indian heritage, whatever the percentage is.That was what she said and what she proved.
    That Peruvian thing also proves you inerrant dishonesty. The native American tribes do not put their DNA in the commonly accessible places. They keep it private. However the other ones are able to prove Indian heritage since they have a similar or identical DNA.you are grasping, grasping, grasping all the time to work backwards from your preconception. Shameful as always.
    White pocahontas claimed more than the average white has, but her test proved she had less.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

Similar Threads

  1. 126 million exposed to fake russain created news
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-17-2017, 04:33 PM
  2. FAKE news loses another one; remember the FAKE "pink slime" story?
    By Truth Detector in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-03-2017, 05:16 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-06-2017, 05:05 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-17-2016, 07:11 PM
  5. Comics: Jen Sorensen on Battling Fake News and Fake Candidates With Real Votes
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-08-2016, 03:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •