"Example b) is incorrect. Holding a valid NY driver's license is a positive predicate." IN #545
That puts you in quite a predicaticament doesn't it.
You're conflating a conclusion (neutral) with proof or disproof.
The DMV disproof is purely chronological. The NY DMV did not exist in the first century. Therefore it could not have been involved.
"Example a) is also incorrect. Bruce's DNA at the murder scene is a positive predicate." IN #545
Bruce didn't deny being there. Bruce denied being a murderer.
The scenario ties Bruce to the scene, not to the crime.
"It should be obvious to anyone why conservatives and libertarians should be against Trump. He has no grounding in belief. No core philosophy. No morals. No loyalty. No curiosity. No empathy and no understanding. He demands personal loyalty and not loyalty to the nation. His only core belief is in his own superiority to everyone else. His only want is exercise more and more personal power." smb / purveyor of fact 18/03/18
Bookmarks