In so doing you dignify equally that which is apparent to the senses, measured and scientifically evaluated with that which is made up and hallucinated and never credibly perceived by the senses of sane humans or any instruments the
most intelligent humans standing on the shoulders of giants ever used to aid in perception. That's my problem with you.
Here is what you are doing more or less.
Rationality may be true.
Fantasy may be true.
Therefore they are of equal logical verity.
Hey I can do it too.
Which of the following is true and real:
a platonic form horse
the dog sitting on your hearth
a rat with a 25 foot dick flying over the moon
all of the above
You are an all of the above guy.
I put more weight on the dog answer. What you are doing is pure sophistry and you do a disservice to rationality.
Stop giving retards the warm fuzzy.
You can, but that means assigning an attribute of God [causeless, eternal being] to creation.
That, and if you want to go with current knowledge the universe had a beginning and is probably finite. Some say it’s cyclical with periods of expansion and contraction but that still begs the question of First Cause.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Then by your view, man is still primitive. Most people believe in some sort of god or gods.
Science doesn't address it at all. It does not prove any god or gods do not exist. Science is agnostic. Have you any idea how many scientists are religious?
No, MAN uses religion to wage his wars. He takes the name of God in vain by doing so.
Argument of ignorance. You cannot know they are not real.
[QUOTE=Nordberg;2665343]
Neither is god.
None needed.
He already has, quite a few times.
No, it wouldn't. That is evident.
You haven't been paying attention then!
All arguments of ignorance.
There is supporting evidence for the existence of God. There is also supporting evidence that there is no god or gods.
It is not possible to prove a god or gods exist. It is not possible to prove a god or gods don't exist.
No, it is based on faith. It can be based on nothing else.
The Theory of the Big Bang is not a theory of science. It is a nonscientific theory, and a religion. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. They are not falsifiable. A religion is an initial circular argument with arguments extending from it.
Bookmarks