Members banned from this thread: Minister of Truth, PostmodernProphet, canceled.2021.2, canceled.2021.3, Text Drivers are Killers, Bigdog and dukkha


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Part II, Advice on polls heading into midterms

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Part II, Advice on polls heading into midterms

    Remember that polls are as only good as their protocols.

    Remember that these polls are predictive of the PV in these elections.

    Remember that there is no EV drift.

    Remember that Trump's red hot rallies (they are losing attendence) will help GOP senatorial candidates in red hot red states, but will hurt GOP candidates in all suburban house districts.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    polls are only correct if they account for the cheating done


    the republican party cheats its ass off in elections


    wins without a majority of voters keep happening


    Funny thing its only republican party wins


    the SCOTUS is now helping the republican party cheat


    they allowed for North Dakota to change what people need to vote ID wise RIGHT BEFORE AN ELECTION


    they just made it so people don't have time to get the UPGRADED type of ID in time to be able to vote.



    how could a SCOTUS be so anti democracy

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8,490
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 2,409 Posts
    Groans
    376
    Groaned 244 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    polls are only correct if they account for the cheating done
    Preemptive excuse making for the lack of a blue wave huh .....

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Irish Exit For This Post:

    canceled.2021.2 (10-16-2018)

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,462
    Thanks
    16,661
    Thanked 20,732 Times in 14,328 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,386 Times in 1,304 Posts

    Default

    SCOTUS tends to let states screw their electorates, unless the screwing is based on race.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    Preemptive excuse making for the lack of a blue wave huh .....
    so you still claim the Russians are not attacking our elections?


    the republicans in control did nothing to stop it

    they in fact took money from states to be able to battle it

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    SCOTUS tends to let states screw their electorates, unless the screwing is based on race.
    it was based on race


    it laser targeted American Indian votes

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,462
    Thanks
    16,661
    Thanked 20,732 Times in 14,328 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,386 Times in 1,304 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    it was based on race


    it laser targeted American Indian votes
    SC doesn't care about 'Indians'. That's pretty stupid. Most don't have a street address, and the state requires a street address. They made a provision to let them vote, but the vote won't count until they get a street address.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    SC doesn't care about 'Indians'. That's pretty stupid. Most don't have a street address, and the state requires a street address. They made a provision to let them vote, but the vote won't count until they get a street address.
    what the fuck are you talking about ?


    its North Dakota that changed the ID laws for NO OTHER REASON but to make the reservation voters unable to vote

    why did it need to have a street and not accept a post office box?

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    SC doesn't care about 'Indians'. That's pretty stupid. Most don't have a street address, and the state requires a street address. They made a provision to let them vote, but the vote won't count until they get a street address.
    it was FINE BEFORE a democrat got elected

    then they changed it to stop the AI from voting for a dem

  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    that ID was fine for the primary

    then they changed it so the people would not have time to get a new ID

    and then your packed SCOTUS allowed that to happen

  13. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,462
    Thanks
    16,661
    Thanked 20,732 Times in 14,328 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,386 Times in 1,304 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    what the fuck are you talking about ?


    its North Dakota that changed the ID laws for NO OTHER REASON but to make the reservation voters unable to vote

    why did it need to have a street and not accept a post office box?
    You'll have to ask the bright red state of ND why they made that rule.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,462
    Thanks
    16,661
    Thanked 20,732 Times in 14,328 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,386 Times in 1,304 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    that ID was fine for the primary

    then they changed it so the people would not have time to get a new ID

    and then your packed SCOTUS allowed that to happen
    SC merely chose not to get involved. Which is typical in many cases where they defer to the states. Similar in Texas with students.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  15. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,506
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked 9,833 Times in 6,110 Posts
    Groans
    422
    Groaned 710 Times in 658 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Remember that polls are as only good as their protocols.

    Remember that these polls are predictive of the PV in these elections.

    Remember that there is no EV drift.

    Remember that Trump's red hot rallies (they are losing attendence) will help GOP senatorial candidates in red hot red states, but will hurt GOP candidates in all suburban house districts.
    Polls never amount to much really. You can find em to meet most conclusions, as they pick who they ask in many a case. I think I remember a poll about favorability of a new bridge back in Detroit. If you noticed the very fine print, it was sponsored by what would be the bridges competition. It might have just been an ad though, and not a poll.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Jade Dragon For This Post:

    Althea (10-16-2018)

  17. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    SC merely chose not to get involved. Which is typical in many cases where they defer to the states. Similar in Texas with students.
    they allowed Americans to have their voting rights stripped

    sorry when you used SC for SCOTUS I thought you were claiming it was in South Carolina

Similar Threads

  1. APP - Advice on polls heading into midterms
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-16-2018, 06:02 AM
  2. APP - Heading into the midterms
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-07-2018, 11:24 AM
  3. How many lefties are heading to DC?
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-31-2018, 11:38 AM
  4. Not that I had much respect for him heading into this
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2018, 09:32 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-22-2018, 04:18 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •