evince (10-16-2018)
evince (10-16-2018)
Are you fucking kidding here...or what?
Bonds are instruments of debt.
Someone or something (often a government) BORROWS money (which they will pay back with interest) for a project of some sort.
Bonds are the instruments whereby that happens.
If YOU borrow money to buy a car...who do you think pays for the car?
The bonds are obligations of the Government...
...and the payments of that debt will come from taxes.
What kind of shit do you think you are pulling here?
The bonds (let's use the federal government) are debts of the federal government...and will be paid with tax money.
Not sure what you think you are doing with this rigmarole...but it is falling way short.
evince (10-16-2018)
These Leftist pricks would not be happy until the "evuullll" rich (excepting of course, the Hollywierd Crowd) are paying 95-100% of all income AND earnings in taxes!
I have never seen anyone carrying a dinner bucket making payrolls with checks saying, Pay to the Order of......no one will ever get rich carrying a dinner bucket. Conclusion: You can never help the wage earner by bringing down the wage payer. Its time this left wing "Bolshevik" communist BS came to an end in the United States of America....the days of the flat nose Union Thugs are past.
countryboy (10-16-2018)
Guille...I doubt many people here are so dumb they think that the government picks up some taxes and drops the tax money off to the construction people doing a project.
You asked me, "..how are public works projects funded?"
I replied, "Through taxes...for the most part."
I was correct.
That does not mean I thought the taxes > contractor was an immediate one...any more than someone's payments on a car loan are direct.
If bonding is done...and BONDING IS ALMOST ALWAYS DONE...the funding for the projects still come from taxes...albeit, not directly.
Almost NOTHING is done directly vis a vis the taxes government payments thingy.
Not exactly. they hire lobbyists to get politicians to change the laws so they can evade taxes. In many cases, the lobbyists write the loophole and the politician inserts inthe back of a huge bill, like the defense bill. Nobody ever reads it and it becomes law with the big package.If someone does read it, will they vote against military appropriations to stop a loophole? Nope. No it gets in .
Jack (10-16-2018)
Bookmarks