NWO Tools

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

The tools of the new world order are,
1. an international army;
2. an international police force;
3. a world bank for the economy;
4. a world government under the United Nations;
5. a world conservatory bank for wilderness preservation around the world. That means all ‘green’ movements will be melded into the new international bank or disappear altogether;
6. a world religion where all church doctrines will be destroyed at the roots to be replaced by the new world religion of the age of Aquarius;
7. the world seven-races classification for all human slaves who will fulfill predetermined work tasks whether they agree with it or not;
8. the world concentration headquarters at the United Nations for those who will not accept the new system;
9. the world agriculture and food supply control which will control food and vitamin supplies around the world.


http://100777.com/node/1207

[uscitizen]

It must be rough being so paranoid.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

It must be rough being so paranoid.

Not really. Is it rough with your head up your ass?

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Oh and usc, which of the items listed above is not being created as we speak?

[uscitizen]

6

[Dilloduck]

The tools of the new world order are,
1. an international army;
2. an international police force;
3. a world bank for the economy;
4. a world government under the United Nations;
5. a world conservatory bank for wilderness preservation around the world. That means all ‘green’ movements will be melded into the new international bank or disappear altogether;
6. a world religion where all church doctrines will be destroyed at the roots to be replaced by the new world religion of the age of Aquarius;
7. the world seven-races classification for all human slaves who will fulfill predetermined work tasks whether they agree with it or not;
8. the world concentration headquarters at the United Nations for those who will not accept the new system;
9. the world agriculture and food supply control which will control food and vitamin supplies around the world.


http://100777.com/node/1207

You forgot a world propaganda--er I mean media and "educational" system.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

6

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Age[/ame]

New Age
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see New Age (disambiguation).
Spirituality Portal
New Age is a term used to describe a broad movement within the context of contemporary Western culture, characterized by an eclectic and individual approach to spiritual exploration as part of a general evolution in human consciousness. Other terms used to describe the movement include Self-spirituality, New spirituality, and Mind-body-spirit. [1] [2] [3] The movement started in the second half of the 20th century and originally referenced the supposed coming astrological Age of Aquarius. Beliefs in New Age ideas are found among diverse individuals, including some who graft additional beliefs onto a traditional religious affiliation. [3] Some individuals who hold any of its beliefs may not identify with the term "New Age", and that term may be applied as a label by outsiders to anyone they consider inclined towards its world view.

The New Age movement includes elements of older spiritual and religious traditions from both East and West, many of which have been melded with ideas from modern science, particularly psychology and ecology. New Age ideas could be described as drawing inspiration from all the major world religions with influences from Spiritualism, Buddhism, Hermeticism, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Shamanism, Mayanism, Ceremonial magic, Sufism, Taoism, New Thought, Wicca and Neo-Paganism being especially strong.

From this collection of influences have come a wide-ranging literature on spirituality, new forms of music known as "new age music", crafts—most visible in speciality shops and New Age fairs and festivals, and increased interest in the methods of alternative medicine.[4][5]

[Damocles]

Oh and usc, which of the items listed above is not being created as we speak?

"one world religion", "one world army", "one world police force", all of these are not being created at this moment.

The UN has no army, Interpol has liaisons from regular police forces, not permanent law enforcement officers of its own, and as for religion... Pffft! All you have to do is look at the US and the ME to know that this isn't happening in any of our lifetimes...

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

"one world religion", "one world army", "one world police force", all of these are not being created at this moment.

The UN has no army, Interpol has liaisons from regular police forces, not permanent law enforcement officers of its own, and as for religion... Pffft! All you have to do is look at the US and the ME to know that this isn't happening in any of our lifetimes...

They're all happening. The UN is given authority at times over troops from member nations.

[Damocles]

They're all happening. The UN is given authority at times over troops from member nations.

They have no army of their own, and one of the groups gains control. (three nations send troops, one of them will have operational control). The UN has no generals of their own, because they have no army at all.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

They have no army of their own, and one of the groups gains control. (three nations send troops, one of them will have operational control). The UN has no generals of their own, because they have no army at all.

Their army is the army of the member states who are ordered to serve under UN control.

http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/1997/10/un_army.html
Specialist Michael New was an American soldier, not a UN mercenary. When he asked his superiors for written explanation regarding the UN uniform order, the response was, "the President says so, therefore it is." It may as well be stated, whatever the President says is justified. When relating to the question, why UN insignia must be worn, the answer was "because they look fabulous." He volunteered to serve anywhere the Army wanted to send him provided he could wear the United States Army uniform. That offer was refused. The Army broke its covenant by arbitrarily changing the agreement with Mr. New once he had signed his enlistment papers.

New reasoned that if the Army could force him to wear the UN blue beret in Europe, they could force him to wear it in America. It is a question of authority; "if they can force me to do it anywhere, they can force me to do it everywhere. I don't like the idea of UN soldiers being deployed in the U.S. I don't want to serve in the UN against my country, but theoretically it's possible."

Subsequently, Michael New was court-martialed for refusal to obey the order to wear the UN uniform. Legal counsel assured him that his position "carried the weight of law and that the Army's position seemed to rest not on the law, but was driven by raw political power, constitutional manipulation and sheer intimidation." (Col. Ron Ray). The Army's insistence on pursuing a bad conduct discharge against Specialist New, in spite of his offer to quietly withdraw to another unit, seemed to indicate a desire to make an example of this case.

[Damocles]

Their army is the army of the member states who are ordered to serve under UN control.

Again, the UN has no "control" of its own as Member Army's serve as operational commanders because there is no UN Army.

What part of that is difficult for you? The part where you are wrong, or the part where I am right?

That the Army forces him to follow their orders doesn't mean that it is suddenly a UN Standing Army.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Again, the UN has no "control" of its own as Member Army's serve as operational commanders because there is no UN Army.

What part of that is difficult for you? The part where you are wrong, or the part where I am right?

The commanders are also from member armies. They too don UN uniforms and work on military projects based on intiatives from the UN. Do you deny the existence of UN peacekeepers?

[Damocles]

The commanders are also from member armies. They too don UN uniforms and work on military projects based on intiatives from the UN. Do you deny the existence of UN peacekeepers?

Again, that doesn't change that they are not UN soldiers, they are simply member armies working together. One of the member armies gets operational control.

They are not UN soldiers, they are blue helmeted US, UK, etc. soldiers.

This is like saying the ICE guys are DEA guys because sometimes they work with them in joint operations.

[Damocles]

I also note the considerable absence of any argument against my other points.