Members banned from this thread: ThatOwlWoman


Page 8 of 12 FirstFirst ... 456789101112 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 179

Thread: Corroboration is not required?? Seriously??

  1. #106 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    11,257
    Thanks
    4,290
    Thanked 5,564 Times in 3,833 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 293 Times in 287 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    They did not "refuse"....
    Of course they did. Don't believe everything you read in tweets.
    Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (10-11-2018)

  3. #107 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    9,772
    Thanks
    7,976
    Thanked 2,159 Times in 1,824 Posts
    Groans
    109
    Groaned 392 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Of course they did. Don't believe everything you read in tweets.
    They did not "refuse"....but if you have a link where the FBI was actually blocked from investigating someone they felt would have been helpful to the check, let me know. I'll read it...

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to TOP For This Post:

    Truth Detector (10-11-2018)

  5. #108 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    11,257
    Thanks
    4,290
    Thanked 5,564 Times in 3,833 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 293 Times in 287 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    They did not "refuse"....but if you have a link where the FBI was actually blocked from investigating someone they felt would have been helpful to the check, let me know. I'll read it...
    FBI director testified before Congress yesterday. Maybe it's time for you to change the channel?
    Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (10-11-2018)

  7. #109 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    9,772
    Thanks
    7,976
    Thanked 2,159 Times in 1,824 Posts
    Groans
    109
    Groaned 392 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    FBI director testified before Congress yesterday. Maybe it's time for you to change the channel?
    OK...link? Where they were denied the ability to interview. I'm not changing the Food Network or the Big Ten Channel...and our local news didn't mention his testimony...

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to TOP For This Post:

    Truth Detector (10-11-2018)

  9. #110 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    588
    Thanks
    117
    Thanked 158 Times in 114 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    You should know the meaning of civic duty before responding to the post. Now you look like a fool.
    “Civic Duty” refers to actions required by law.
    I believe you refer to her civic responsibilities.

    I know she never claimed having a strong case. Based on what the media and what she has provided I said she doesn’t have a strong case.
    I have been involved in the court process for 35 years.
    If you don’t have a strong case you don’t make allegations. She made the allegations for political reasons only.

    Idiot it wasn’t just the two alleged attackers. She testified to others being there including life long friend.
    This incident was so traumatic no one could recall anything she testified to.
    She couldn’t recall who drove her home.
    After the incident no one said “what’s wrong”. Did she leave immediately or stay at the party.

    Genius.
    Based on the information presented to the public (her testimony, letter to the Post, etc.) what supporting evidence has been presented to anything she has made public. Self serving allegations are not supporting evidence. If you can’t realize that by now your a lost cause.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Tkaffen For This Post:

    Truth Detector (10-11-2018)

  11. #111 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    10,043
    Thanks
    4,617
    Thanked 4,511 Times in 2,885 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 237 Times in 230 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    But she did not want to go public when she decided it was her civic duty. How was that supposed to work?
    What did she "expect"?
    What the hell are you talking about?

    A majority of women who are assaulted feel it is better to just shut up about it...mostly because disgusting turds like you will act toward them the way you do.

    She spoke up when SHE decided it was time to do so...when SHE decided it was her civic duty to do so.

    And she did so reluctantly...FOR GOOD REASON.

  12. #112 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    10,043
    Thanks
    4,617
    Thanked 4,511 Times in 2,885 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 237 Times in 230 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stargazer View Post
    There was nothing to investigate. Everyone she claimed was there (she didn't know where) said it never happened.
    No...they did not.

    Kavanaugh said it didn't happen.

    Judge MAY have said it didn't happen.

    No one else said it didn't happen except those two.

    SHE certainly did not say it didn't happen. In fact she insisted it DID HAPPEN.

    Her friend said she did not see it happen. But...she was not in that room.

  13. #113 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    10,043
    Thanks
    4,617
    Thanked 4,511 Times in 2,885 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 237 Times in 230 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille View Post
    Yes, she did have a duty, or responsibility if you like, to at least warn the public of the presence of a man she believed to be into sexually assaulting women.
    SHE HAD NO OBLIGATION WHATSOEVER to report the incident at that time.

    It appears that most women do not report assaults...because of what they will get from assholes like you.



    If she truly believed Kavanaugh was a rapist and said nothing and allowed him to continue to prey on unsuspecting women then she's a failure as a Citizen.
    YOU are a failure as a citizen, Guille...and as a human.

    That is allowed.

    Under any circumstances, SHE HAD NO OBLIGATION WHATSOEVER to report the incident at that time.

    And yes, I know she didn't actually accuse Kavanaugh of rape but she strongly implied she would have been raped had the assault not been broken up.
    Thank you for agreeing with the obvious...namely that she did not accuse Kavanaugh of raping her.

  14. #114 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    10,043
    Thanks
    4,617
    Thanked 4,511 Times in 2,885 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 237 Times in 230 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    There was nothing to investigate...
    There was lots to investigate...

    ...which is the reason the White House did not want the investigation to be thorough.

  15. #115 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    10,043
    Thanks
    4,617
    Thanked 4,511 Times in 2,885 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 237 Times in 230 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    ...or "death" might have occurred....so, if it did indeed take place, even more reason to report it...
    She had no obligation to report it.

    It appears as though MOST WOMEN would not have reported it...in large part because of the reactions of assholes like you.

  16. #116 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    10,043
    Thanks
    4,617
    Thanked 4,511 Times in 2,885 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 237 Times in 230 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    They did not "refuse"....
    They refused a thorough investigation.

    And all but the puppets know why.

  17. #117 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    10,043
    Thanks
    4,617
    Thanked 4,511 Times in 2,885 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 237 Times in 230 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    They did not "refuse"....but if you have a link where the FBI was actually blocked from investigating someone they felt would have been helpful to the check, let me know. I'll read it...
    They did not do a thorough investigation.

    They did not interview Ford.

    And they did not interview Kavanaugh.

    Lucky for Kavanaugh, because he would not have been able to evade actually answering questions like he did with the committee.

  18. #118 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    10,043
    Thanks
    4,617
    Thanked 4,511 Times in 2,885 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 237 Times in 230 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tkaffen View Post
    You should know the meaning of civic duty before responding to the post. Now you look like a fool.
    “Civic Duty” refers to actions required by law.
    I believe you refer to her civic responsibilities.

    I know she never claimed having a strong case. Based on what the media and what she has provided I said she doesn’t have a strong case.
    I have been involved in the court process for 35 years.
    If you don’t have a strong case you don’t make allegations. She made the allegations for political reasons only.

    Idiot it wasn’t just the two alleged attackers. She testified to others being there including life long friend.
    This incident was so traumatic no one could recall anything she testified to.
    She couldn’t recall who drove her home.
    After the incident no one said “what’s wrong”. Did she leave immediately or stay at the party.

    Genius.
    Based on the information presented to the public (her testimony, letter to the Post, etc.) what supporting evidence has been presented to anything she has made public. Self serving allegations are not supporting evidence. If you can’t realize that by now your a lost cause.
    She felt it was her civic duty to tell the truth about a nominee for the SCOTUS.

    Keep on digging. You deserve it.

  19. #119 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    39,872
    Thanks
    46,494
    Thanked 7,111 Times in 6,219 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,692 Times in 2,434 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    THAT HAS BEEN EXPLAINED DOZENS UPON DOZENS OF TIME.

    NOT SHOUTING.

    JUST WANT FOR YOU FINALLY TO GET THE MESSAGE.
    Frank......

    “A wise and frugal government… shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.” — Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801

    The real fantasy world is the one that allows Democrats to run from a past that never was to a future no one wants

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (10-11-2018)

  21. #120 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    39,872
    Thanks
    46,494
    Thanked 7,111 Times in 6,219 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,692 Times in 2,434 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille View Post
    Holy Shit you're dumb.
    Yes, he really, really is.
    “A wise and frugal government… shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.” — Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801

    The real fantasy world is the one that allows Democrats to run from a past that never was to a future no one wants

Similar Threads

  1. Corroboration is not required
    By christiefan915 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 139
    Last Post: 10-09-2018, 05:37 PM
  2. Corroboration is not required - part deux
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 10-09-2018, 05:03 AM
  3. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 10-03-2018, 01:21 PM
  4. Is an ID required?
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-30-2011, 05:01 PM
  5. Required Reading for GOP
    By Damocles in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 05-07-2010, 12:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •