Repost Your Favorite Leftist Meltdown Thread Titles Here

[bhaktajan]

We have received an anonymous letter saying that Cypress has done unspeakable things against teenage girls ... we will not reveal it until we find Cypress becomes some one of importance that we disagree with.

In my opinion, this was the biggest emotional meltdown of the week.
I have actually never seen a dude weeping, blubbering, yelling, and being petulant during a job interview.

Nomination & Confirmation Process

The Process
The President usually will consult with Senators before announcing a nomination.

When the President nominates a candidate, the nomination is sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration.

The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing on the nominee. The Committee usually takes a month to collect and receive all necessary records, from the FBI and other sources, about the nominee and for the nominee to be prepared for the hearings.

During the hearings, witnesses, both supporting and opposing the nomination, present their views. Senators question the nominee on his or her qualifications, judgment, and philosophy.

The Judiciary Committee then votes on the nomination and sends its recommendation (that it be confirmed, that it be rejected, or with no recommendation) to the full Senate.

The full Senate debates the nomination.

The Senate rules used to allow unlimited debate (a practice known as filibustering) and to end the debate, it required the votes of 3/5 of the Senate or 60 senators (known as the cloture vote). In April 2017, the Senate changed this rule and lowered the required votes to 51 to end debate on Supreme Court nominations (this is commonly known as "the nuclear option").

When the debate ends, the Senate votes on the nomination. A simple majority of the Senators present and voting is required for the judicial nominee to be confirmed. If there is a tie, the Vice President who also presides over the Senate casts the deciding vote.
http://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.ph...5722&p=2471070




Why are these items missing from the process?:
1. Claiming Privilege on Therapist’s Notes
2. Immediate Family Is Silent
3. Incomplete Polygraph Results
4. Bizarre Demands
5. A Bogus Fear of Flying

[USFREEDOM911]

I only have these two threads, that I kept, which were started by JPP liberals:

I predict the GOP will pay a HEAVY price for this kangaroo hearing in Nov

the drunk preppy perv won't win full senate confirmation

But, I do have these oldies; but goodies quotes:

Althea - MIA since 10/6

Kavanaugh is gone by Wednesday

BAC - Still posting

I have a prediction .. Kavanaugh will not go through an FBI investigation.

floridanfan - MIA since 10/2

If its any consolation to you, Mr. Kavanaugh will never be confirmed

jimmymccready - still posting

The tools and fools know the Dems are going to outvote them again this time around, only in greater numbers, and there is no EV this time either.
The Donald dementos are trapped by their lies.
Dr. Ford has nailed Judge K's ass to the ground. Don't be surprised if he withdraws by Friday.

Leonthecat - MIA since 10/3

Kavanaugh is a rapist and a liar.
He will not be approved.

Kavanaugh is a rapist.

Kavanaugh will withdraw before he submits to a polygraph.
He knows he is a rapist.

The FBI will do the due diligence and recommend that Kavanaugh is unfit to serve.

LV426 - MIA since 10/2

Then Brett doesn't get a confirmation either until after the election, when the people have had a chance to weigh in.

Nope. Doesn't matter.
I don't know the process for this type of thing, but in the past, the FBI has investigated. They did that with Thomas/Hill. Why is this any different?
I'd say it's even money the nomination is pulled by the end of the week.

reagansghost - Still posting

Kav ain't going nowhere except to a threapist

Kav ain't going nowhere, he's fucked

Kav ain't going nowhere cept maybe rehab

and Kav won't be confirmed

and Kav won't be confirmed

the righties on this thread are freaking out, know damn well Kav is toast lol

Kav is toast, get over it

So 4 out of the 7 seem to have disappeared!!

I wonder why??

[canceled.2021.2]

Did I say that?

Did you get confused by the question mark?

[Cancel 2020.1]

Did you get confused by the question mark?

Did you?

[canceled.2021.2]

Did you?

Nope. I asked you a very clear question. You answered with a question.

I think it is because, like me, you know the answer

[canceled.2021.2]

We have received an anonymous letter saying that Cypress has done unspeakable things against teenage girls ... we will not reveal it until we find Cypress becomes some one of importance that we disagree with.



Nomination & Confirmation Process

The Process
The President usually will consult with Senators before announcing a nomination.

When the President nominates a candidate, the nomination is sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration.

The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing on the nominee. The Committee usually takes a month to collect and receive all necessary records, from the FBI and other sources, about the nominee and for the nominee to be prepared for the hearings.

During the hearings, witnesses, both supporting and opposing the nomination, present their views. Senators question the nominee on his or her qualifications, judgment, and philosophy.

The Judiciary Committee then votes on the nomination and sends its recommendation (that it be confirmed, that it be rejected, or with no recommendation) to the full Senate.

The full Senate debates the nomination.

The Senate rules used to allow unlimited debate (a practice known as filibustering) and to end the debate, it required the votes of 3/5 of the Senate or 60 senators (known as the cloture vote). In April 2017, the Senate changed this rule and lowered the required votes to 51 to end debate on Supreme Court nominations (this is commonly known as "the nuclear option").

When the debate ends, the Senate votes on the nomination. A simple majority of the Senators present and voting is required for the judicial nominee to be confirmed. If there is a tie, the Vice President who also presides over the Senate casts the deciding vote.
http://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.ph...5722&p=2471070




Why are these items missing from the process?:
1. Claiming Privilege on Therapist’s Notes
2. Immediate Family Is Silent
3. Incomplete Polygraph Results
4. Bizarre Demands
5. A Bogus Fear of Flying

Might be advisable for you to delete this post

[Lightbringer]

Might be advisable for you to delete this post

Exactly. This place will tolerate a lot of things but 12b ain't one of them.

[canceled.2021.2]

Exactly. This place will tolerate a lot of things but 12b ain't one of them.

Amazingly people still don't learn. The Mods have come out in no uncertain terms and stated that there is a ZERO tolerance policy when it comes to talking other board members pedophiles. For some reason folks can't seem to grasp that one simple fact. It is the quickest way to the penalty box

[Lightbringer]

Amazingly people still don't learn. The Mods have come out in no uncertain terms and stated that there is a ZERO tolerance policy when it comes to talking other board members pedophiles. For some reason folks can't seem to grasp that one simple fact. It is the quickest way to the penalty box

I know. A while ago someone complained because they thought I was just implying it...which I wasn't...but I got a PM from Grind just for that and he was not playing.

[Eagle_Eye]

I think of the inbred, toothless, illiterate, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, racist, xenophobic, homophobic, theocratic, racist, misogynist, parasitic, mentally and physically diseased troglodytes who are my family. We need to examine them closer to see if they actually have a trace of human DNA.

There is no doubt about it you are a product of inbreeding, dog boy.

[/MSG/]

We have received an anonymous letter saying that Cypress has done unspeakable things against teenage girls ... we will not reveal it until we find Cypress becomes some one of importance that we disagree with.



Nomination & Confirmation Process

The Process
The President usually will consult with Senators before announcing a nomination.

When the President nominates a candidate, the nomination is sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration.

The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing on the nominee. The Committee usually takes a month to collect and receive all necessary records, from the FBI and other sources, about the nominee and for the nominee to be prepared for the hearings.

During the hearings, witnesses, both supporting and opposing the nomination, present their views. Senators question the nominee on his or her qualifications, judgment, and philosophy.

The Judiciary Committee then votes on the nomination and sends its recommendation (that it be confirmed, that it be rejected, or with no recommendation) to the full Senate.

The full Senate debates the nomination.

The Senate rules used to allow unlimited debate (a practice known as filibustering) and to end the debate, it required the votes of 3/5 of the Senate or 60 senators (known as the cloture vote). In April 2017, the Senate changed this rule and lowered the required votes to 51 to end debate on Supreme Court nominations (this is commonly known as "the nuclear option").

When the debate ends, the Senate votes on the nomination. A simple majority of the Senators present and voting is required for the judicial nominee to be confirmed. If there is a tie, the Vice President who also presides over the Senate casts the deciding vote.
http://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.ph...5722&p=2471070




Why are these items missing from the process?:
1. Claiming Privilege on Therapist’s Notes
2. Immediate Family Is Silent
3. Incomplete Polygraph Results
4. Bizarre Demands
5. A Bogus Fear of Flying

This can serve as your official warning.

Do not, in any way, shape, or form, insinuate that a poster here is a pedophile or has committed sexual crimes with a minor. Do it again and you'll be banned.

Drop the shit.

[evince]

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...o-Not-Politics

Uhm-Hmm ......

As if Machismo is something wrong.

What kind of person would have a problem with men being masculine ???

Think about that for a sec before answering.

you think seeing women as their lessor is masculine?

why do you hate your mother sooo much?

[Red Crow]

you think seeing women as their lessor is masculine?

why do you hate your mother sooo much?

You obviously have no clue of the definition of Machismo.

[Red Crow]

Republicans are fascists full stop

Poor, poor, wittle weftist .....

All that hatred for one's Country and Countrymen can be hard to contain sometimes.

[bhaktajan]

This can serve as your official warning.

Do not, in any way, shape, or form, insinuate that a poster here is a pedophile or has committed sexual crimes with a minor. Do it again and you'll be banned.

Drop the shit.

I apologize.

I have received No "anonymous letter" ---it does not exists. I could have easily selected another metaphor.

I lacked editorial tack and civility and neglect for the rules of the Board.

It is important that we agree, and that I be call me out for my error, that I trespassed the norms of decorum and propriety.