Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 51

Thread: US national debt tops $21.5 TRILLION.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    45,165
    Thanks
    9,831
    Thanked 7,427 Times in 5,874 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 6,523 Times in 6,264 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default US national debt tops $21.5 TRILLION.

    Soaring by $38,000 per second: US national debt now exceeds $21.5 trillion



    The latest data from the US Treasury Department shows America’s gross national debt ballooned by $1.2 trillion to a breathtaking $21.52 trillion on September 28, the last day of fiscal year 2018.

    https://www.rt.com/business/440190-u...al-debt-soars/
    Doesn't one trillion equal one thousand billion dollars ?

    That's quite a lot , isn't it ?


    How's Kavanaugh's pecker coming along ?
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    45,165
    Thanks
    9,831
    Thanked 7,427 Times in 5,874 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 6,523 Times in 6,264 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    How much is it today- at thirty-eight thousand bucks per second ?


    Oh yeah- what's the pecker news ?
    Last edited by moon; 10-05-2018 at 07:35 AM.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    22,675
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked 12,388 Times in 7,999 Posts
    Groans
    16
    Groaned 809 Times in 761 Posts

    Default

    "Quickly and easily"

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,543
    Thanks
    441
    Thanked 1,874 Times in 1,170 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 202 Times in 195 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    Doesn't one trillion equal one thousand billion dollars ?

    That's quite a lot , isn't it ?


    How's Kavanaugh's pecker coming along ?
    We know what it takes to lower the debt. Between 1946 and 1981, federal debt as a share of GDP fell from 118.9% to just 31.7%. And we did it a second time, too. Between 1993 and 2001, it fell from 64.9% to just 54.6%.

    The secret is to keep military spending from growing too much, and to avoid reckless upper-class tax cuts. Do those two things, and the nation will tend to grow its way gradually out of debt.

    Unfortunately, we also get periods like 1981-1993, and again following 2001, when we go the opposite way: we vastly bloat our military budget, and slash tax rates for the rich to rock-bottom levels. That results in an explosion of debt: a greater than doubling in that first era from 31.7% to 64.9%, and a near doubling in the latter era from 54.6% to 107.2%.

    There's no big mystery here. We know what works to lower debt and what drives it up. It's just a question of whether we're willing to act on that knowledge.

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Oneuli For This Post:

    moon (10-05-2018), Phantasmal (10-05-2018), PoliTalker (10-05-2018)

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    Doesn't one trillion equal one thousand billion dollars ?

    That's quite a lot , isn't it ?


    How's Kavanaugh's pecker coming along ?
    this can't be, the Repukes are fiscal conservatives

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,447
    Thanks
    23,965
    Thanked 19,108 Times in 13,083 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Funny how the explosion of the debt almost exactly mirrors the explosion of wealth inequality.

    Correlation?
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    I recall 14 trillion and was like, OK well, we owe about a year of GNP. Lets suck it up and all work for a year for free and pay it all off!

    OK now it's up to 1 year and 1/2 GNP.


    Thanks Trump. Thanks for the leadership and solving the problems and winning. It's was sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo EZ, right?

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Funny how the explosion of the debt almost exactly mirrors the explosion of wealth inequality.

    Correlation?
    Make the case, I guess. It sounds complicated. Submitted as to an association.
    So how does the expanding debt of the US government make the poor poorer and the rich richer.
    How is that a wealth extraction scenario? Why is the loss visited on the poor more in their total government and
    private enterprise position and conversely, enriches the wealthy? If it is causative, can we
    just soak the rich and make in kind grants to the poor and middle and that would make the national debt be paid off?

    That's over my head.

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Funny how the explosion of the debt almost exactly mirrors the explosion of wealth inequality.

    Correlation?
    It makes a lot of sense. Debt usually "explodes" in downturns and the poor usually suffer more than anyone else in those downturns.

  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8,490
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 2,409 Posts
    Groans
    376
    Groaned 244 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Make the case, I guess. It sounds complicated. Submitted as to an association.
    So how does the expanding debt of the US government make the poor poorer and the rich richer.
    How is that a wealth extraction scenario? Why is the loss visited on the poor more in their total government and
    private enterprise position and conversely, enriches the wealthy? If it is causative, can we
    just soak the rich and make in kind grants to the poor and middle and that would make the national debt be paid off?

    That's over my head.
    New government debt is how money supply gets expanded. That money has to pool somewhere. Fiat currency is debt-backed instruments. While the DNC minions would never agree, it is actually better the money gets trapped at the top rather than spread throughout the lower classes.

  13. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,447
    Thanks
    23,965
    Thanked 19,108 Times in 13,083 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Micawber,

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Make the case, I guess. It sounds complicated. Submitted as to an association.
    So how does the expanding debt of the US government make the poor poorer and the rich richer.
    How is that a wealth extraction scenario? Why is the loss visited on the poor more in their total government and
    private enterprise position and conversely, enriches the wealthy? If it is causative, can we
    just soak the rich and make in kind grants to the poor and middle and that would make the national debt be paid off?

    That's over my head.
    To me, the case makes itself.

    The wealth of the super-rich has shot up over recent decades just as the national debt has. The super-rich have an outsized influence on government policy. Basic logic.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    Doesn't one trillion equal one thousand billion dollars ?

    That's quite a lot , isn't it ?


    How's Kavanaugh's pecker coming along ?
    How's Trump's trillion dollar deficit spending coming along?

  15. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Hello Micawber,



    To me, the case makes itself.

    The wealth of the super-rich has shot up over recent decades just as the national debt has. The super-rich have an outsized influence on government policy. Basic logic.

    OK you have a hypothesis to hang your hat on. Otherwise its a coincidence aka an association. Interesting to test it in ways like amount of money from 1 percent paid to lobbyists
    causing law passage of law that greases the economic skids to increase revenue of such and such business interest. The simple example is a tax cut to the 1%. More complicated

    would be a law that increases costs of necessities to consumers and adds profit to suppliers. One point that requires no proof is the proposition that poor people don't hire lobbyists.
    Their interests can only be lobbied by interest groups and voting en masse for Democrats.

  16. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,328
    Thanks
    13,310
    Thanked 40,978 Times in 32,293 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    so Trump increased the national debt by $1.5 trillion over two years......half the rate of Obama.....bad news for Thingie.....he's got a permaban bet riding his prediction that Trump would double the national debt....that means he has to hit $40T......he had better pray Trump gets re-elected....

Similar Threads

  1. Federal debt tops $16 trillion, Treasury Dept. says
    By j-mac in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-04-2012, 11:05 PM
  2. Our $14.3 Trillion National Debt
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-16-2012, 05:39 PM
  3. National Debt Tops $14 Trillion
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 04:57 PM
  4. National Debt Now Tops $12 Trillion
    By meme in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 07:51 PM
  5. National debt hits 9 Trillion.
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 11-08-2007, 06:43 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •