Bigdog (09-23-2018), cancel2 2022 (09-23-2018), Eagle_Eye (09-23-2018), Irish (09-23-2018), Stretch (09-23-2018), USFREEDOM911 (09-23-2018)
another person claimed by Christine Blasey Ford to have attended a gathering decades ago during which, Ford claims, she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has denied any recollection of having attended the party.
In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford's at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.
“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News.
Politico reported that the email was in response to a letter from a lawyer for the GOP majority staff, which said: "I understand that you have been identified as an individual who was in attendance at a party that occurred circa 1982 described in a recent Washington Post article."
In response, Ford’s lawyer Debra Katz said: “As Dr. Ford has said, she did not share her story publicly or with anyone for years following the incident with Judge Kavanaugh.
"It's not surprising that Ms. Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it. It's also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her. Dr. Ford of course will never forget this gathering because of what happened to her there.”
Keyser’s denial brings to four the number of witnesses, including Kavanaugh, who’ve all said they have no memory of the party or the incident.
Other denials were issued earlier this week by Mark Judge and Patrick “PJ” Smith.
“One week ago, Dr. Christine Ford claimed she was assaulted at a house party attended by four others. Since then, all four of these individuals have provided statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of the incident or even having attended such a party.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...inst-ford.html
Bigdog (09-23-2018), cancel2 2022 (09-23-2018), Eagle_Eye (09-23-2018), Irish (09-23-2018), Stretch (09-23-2018), USFREEDOM911 (09-23-2018)
Stretch (09-23-2018)
Stretch (09-23-2018)
Fords lawyer says it doesn’t matter if the friend remembers or not
She says Ford never discussed it with her
So there. If Ford says it happened. It happened
No facts
No physical evidence
No witnesses
Yet liberals want us to believe Ford.
USFREEDOM911 (09-23-2018)
cancel2 2022 (09-23-2018)
I disagree lol.
Ford and her democrat lawyers don’t get to run the country over a decades old allegation. SCOTUS goes back into session soon. Democrats aren’t going to relent no matter how the hearing turns out anyway.
Set a firm date for the hearing. If she doesn’t show up, then it must not be that important to her. Have the vote.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Stretch (09-23-2018)
This tramp made the whole thing up.
Sounds like a complete fabrication at this point.
Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.
Abortion
Pro-Choice
Women's rights
Women's Health
No, it’s as the lawyer stated. Do you remember every party you attended as a 15 year old? I remember only one in detail, the reason I remember it is one of the kids had an epileptic attack. It was the first one I had ever seen, so it left an impression on me. If the young woman who attended the party wasn’t aware of the attack, there would be no reason to remember the party.
cancel2 2022 (09-23-2018)
christiefan915 (09-23-2018), Cypress (09-23-2018), ThatOwlWoman (09-23-2018)
Who knows lol.
Which is kind of the point—its impossible to resolve one way or another. Ford admits to being drunk; it was over 30 years ago; no witnesses that confirm the allegations. It’s no wonder DiFi sat on the letter as long as she did.
But I think it’s telling that Ford is lawyering up: she could be at risk for perjury if she can’t keep her story straight. IF she testifies [I’m nearly convinced she never had any intention to] you can bet she’ll confer with her lawyers before practically ever answer before the Senate committee.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
So far, it's just her "word"..there's been ample time for others to step up in her defense....
Life is Golden (09-23-2018)
But if all the key alleged witnesses to this alleged party, as named by Ford, all have no recollection of even being at the alleged party, and have publicly stated such, how exactly would an investigation proceed from here? Would they gather forensic evidence, after 36 years? And why did the left wing hacktivist lawyer for Ford say 30 years? The partisan hack evidently can't even keep the timeline straight. This is bullshit.
Every life matters
Completely unsurprising. There is no reason for anyone to remember a party from four decades ago, unless there was some traumatic or exceptional event that occurred.“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,”
I do not know what you Trump boot-lickers are so worried about. If Ms. Ford completely fabricated this entire thing, she is not going to come across as a credible witness under the spotlight and tough questioning. That is why I don't get why rightwingers are so stressed about her testifying at the Senate if they truly believe she fabricated this story out of whole clothe.
cancel2 2022 (09-23-2018)
christiefan915 (09-23-2018), ThatOwlWoman (09-23-2018)
Bookmarks