Members banned from this thread: CFM |
I don't think you would find the same situation at an Ivy League school, and the athletes there parents most likely could afford to buy their kids Mercedes
https://totalfratmove.com/alabama-fo...n-the-country/
This is so cool:
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-...-at-ohio-state
Lightbringer (12-03-2018)
Haskins...last two games....895 yards, Eleven touchdowns...
(Total TD...7 more than Murray...Ten more than Tua...)
Just saying
OK Mr. Grammer Nazi, LOL! I, think it is safe to say that Alabama does gamble on large players for their Offensive and Defensive line players, and I also think it is safe to say that if the other teams in the NCAA Southeastern Conference want to compete in that conference, they should do as the Romans do- if they want to keep up with the Romans.
But, in watching most Crimson Tide games, they win their games in the trenches- and on both Defense and Offense. It's no secret!
And Bully for Alabama! They are good scouts and have an excellent recruitment- and have a good sense to know how to win, what it takes to do that, and keep their edge going!
I'm not here to take away from what Nick Saban has accomplished in the last decade, as he deserves a lot of the credit for the dynasty.
Tua did great....not as good as Haskins, Murrey or Minshew, but he did great. But the gold standard for the Heisman winner is the person who contributes the most to his teams success. In that context Tyler Murray walks off and leaves both Tua, Minshew and Haskins behind.
If you go by Stats then Haskins is unquestionably deserving and so is Washington's Minshew.
Sorry QB Tua's got a great rating but he just hasn't put up the numbers that Haskins, Minshew and Murray and we've seen that Alabama can win without Tua...Tua just hasn't put up the numbers that Murray, Haskins and Minshew has.
No I think Murray separated himself out from a stellar crowd of QB's this weekend and he'll be the Heisman winner with Haskins #2 (and a possible dark horse to take it). Minshew and/or Tua will be 3 or 4 and that sounds fair to me based on their performance. There were just too many times Murray put OK back into games they otherwise would have lost. I think Murray best meets the Heisman criteria of contributing the most to his teams success. He should get it.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Bookmarks