Scrubbed Her Social Media Accounts: What is Christine Braley Ford trying to hide?

[dukkha]

Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations towards Kavanaugh are completely off the wall. Before she came forward, out of the shadows, her social media accounts were scrubbed. Nothing adds up about this story and many holes are popping up all throughout her accusations.

The letter started in the hands of Dianne Feinstein who mentioned the anonymous letter from an alleged incident that happened 30+ years ago from an anonymous person who didn’t want to step forward. I gather this bought democrats enough time to get their story straight and to scrub Blasey Ford’s social media accounts. Why scrub them, what are they hiding?

I have a heart for sexually abused women, I really do. But I do not believe that this is a true or honest accusation. This looks like a play out of the democrat’s playbook to keep Kavanaugh, a pro-life Judge out of the Supreme Court. This woman has no recollection of where she was when the “incident” happened or how she got home. She also never told anyone because she “didn’t want to get in trouble.”

Blasey Ford also participated in the Women’s March with pink p***y hats that she helped make. Obviously her social media accounts were scrubbed of her leftist activities and comments so that her political agenda wouldn’t be known and thus, would make a stronger case.

Via American Thinker:

Turns out her present politics has a lot to do with what we are seeing. She’s a fanatic Bay Area far-left activist.
She donated cash to ShareBlue, a generic Democratic front for cash-raising of the Obama-hipster variety. On Twitter, there was some talk (unverified) that she gave $5,000 to Hillary Clinton, and a more reliable report from reporter Ryan Saavedra that she gave money to Bernie Sanders, the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
https://ussanews.com/News1/2018/09/1...rying-to-hide/

[dukkha]

Kavanaugh Accuser’s High School Yearbook Was Edited
Binge drinking and promiscuity was promoted by the Holton Girl’s School.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “The yearbook clearly portrays the young girls as the sexual predators of younger men. The Cult of the First Amendment posted an extensive analysis of Christine Blasey’s elitist high school where faculty promoted an environment of binge drinking, promiscuity and elitism.”
http://www.americanjournalreview.com...g-and-elitism/

[Cancel 2020.1]

It seems impossible that some on the right do not understand why she would do this.

[SmarterthanYou]

It seems impossible that some on the right do not understand why she would do this.

it also seems improbable that some on the left do not understand why doing this looks 'fishy'

[Althea]

it also seems improbable that some on the left do not understand why doing this looks 'fishy'

Do tell

[tinfoil]

An accusation without evidence is not convincing except to those whose bias is confirmed.

[Darth Omar]

It seems impossible that some on the right do not understand why she would do this.

Why she would do it is the question.

If Ford is a far left activist that could be relevant in terms of a motive. Scrubbing social media accounts is a good way to keep people in the dark about a motive. Not remembering the time and place when the event occured prevents Kavanaugh from being able to prove he was somewhere else. The memory loss seems a little convenient, in that sense.

Why is DiFi protecting the Ford letter like it contains classified information? I can think of no good reason to keep it from the public eye if Ford is going public with criminal accusations against Kavanaugh.

[Bigdog]

A liberal psychology professor deleting evidence? ... hmmm.

I guess it's like asking why did one of her heroes, Hillary, delete 30,000 subpoenaed emails.

[Althea]

An accusation without evidence is not convincing except to those whose bias is confirmed.

Not convincing to rapists, at least. Or are you saying that the FBI should gather evidence before any hearing?

[Bigdog]

Not convincing to rapists, at least. Or are you saying that the FBI should gather evidence before any hearing?

There's no crime scene ... or even a timeline that can be investigated.

All potential witnesses have already said it didn't happen.

What do you want to investigate exactly?

[canceled.2021.2]

Not convincing to rapists, at least. Or are you saying that the FBI should gather evidence before any hearing?

What kind of evidence do you think would be around after 36 years?

Did Chrissy save the fated bathing suit?
Does she have a 36 year old scar from being scratched?

[canceled.2021.2]

An accusation without evidence is not convincing except to those whose bias is confirmed.

While I enjoy making fun of the leftists, what makes very sad is that they are making a mockery of women who truly are victims of assault.

Stunts like these are what make it harder for women to come forward


This who,e story was concocted in July. They had Ford ready to go back then.

I am supposed to believe that when she was ready to come forward, the first and only lawyer she could find to support her was a left wing Soros supporter? Oh and the. She gets some Clinton hack to advise her?

This non political person?

There are no coincidences

[Darth Omar]

A liberal psychology professor deleting evidence? ... hmmm.

I guess it's like asking why did one of her heroes, Hillary, delete 30,000 subpoenaed emails.

She’s a professor at a Bay Area private university so there’s a decent probability she’s a flaming lefty. There’s unverified reports she’s given as much as 5K in political donations and she could probably afford it based on her private school professor salary. And if she gives like that, there’s a reasonable probability she has rubbed elbows with the likes of Nancy and DiFi.

If that is true then they should be careful about putting her in front of congress. Or at least make a lot of stipulations if they do.

And guess what lol?

[tinfoil]

Not convincing to rapists, at least. Or are you saying that the FBI should gather evidence before any hearing?

LOL I'm saying the FBI would have something to find if there was any evidence besides her story, which there isn't because she never went to the police when it happened.
It's sad that you can't parse logic without calling people rapists. Fuck you and your fucking party. I hope they outlaw abortion at this point. You liberals really know how to alienate people by making such stupid arguments.

[Phantasmal]

LOL I'm saying the FBI would have something to find if there was any evidence besides her story, which there isn't because she never went to the police when it happened.
It's sad that you can't parse logic without calling people rapists. Fuck you and your fucking party. I hope they outlaw abortion at this point. You liberals really know how to alienate people by making such stupid arguments.

You mad bro?