This debate is between: Jarod and canceled.2021.2


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24

Thread: Legal questions for Jarod

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,279
    Thanks
    9,842
    Thanked 33,936 Times in 21,683 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,704 Times in 5,204 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    In a standard court case it would not be an issue, in civil cases I often call the defendant to the stand first.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    If it were the only way to win, like it appears here, I would.
    No you wouldn't. And they can win without it

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    In a standard court case it would not be an issue, in civil cases I often call the defendant to the stand first.
    I don't believe you

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,279
    Thanks
    9,842
    Thanked 33,936 Times in 21,683 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,704 Times in 5,204 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I don't believe you
    You don't have to, I don't care.

    Just look it up, many civil injury cases have the Defendant testify first.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,279
    Thanks
    9,842
    Thanked 33,936 Times in 21,683 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,704 Times in 5,204 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    No you wouldn't. And they can win without it
    You asked, then tell me I am wrong... how silly. Sorry you lose.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  6. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,279
    Thanks
    9,842
    Thanked 33,936 Times in 21,683 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,704 Times in 5,204 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Hahaha, will there even be a hearing this week?

    So, what question did I not answer? Gunna keep obfuscating and trying to salvage this total failure? Or, because its APP are you going to wimp out and try to get this thread erased out of embarrassment?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  7. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,279
    Thanks
    9,842
    Thanked 33,936 Times in 21,683 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,704 Times in 5,204 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    You challenged me to a debate, why are you not participating?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  8. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,279
    Thanks
    9,842
    Thanked 33,936 Times in 21,683 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,704 Times in 5,204 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    ???

  9. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    ???
    I didn't challenge you to a debate. I asked you a question. You dodged. It's OK.

Similar Threads

  1. Hey Jarod!!!!!! I can too
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-10-2018, 07:21 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-21-2018, 01:13 PM
  3. Jarod
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-12-2016, 09:26 PM
  4. Hey Jarod....
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-24-2011, 03:08 PM
  5. For Jarod
    By cawacko in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-26-2009, 04:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •