Christians are anti-science.

[gfm7175]

FFS.

Who is Fuck and why is his sake important?

You're one annoying person,

... the feeling is mutual.

and this has nothing to do with your science denial.

Inversion Fallacy.

[TexanManWithPlans]

Who is Fuck and why is his sake important?


... the feeling is mutual.


Inversion Fallacy.

Rattling off a few fallacies doesn't mean I'm using them, nor does stating something make it true.

[gfm7175]

Rattling off a few fallacies doesn't mean I'm using them,

I'm noting some of them as you commit them... Instead of choosing to whine about it, you could choose to learn about what they are, how you are committing them, and how to avoid committing them...

nor does stating something make it true.

If you wish to learn about the logic, science, mathematics, etc. behind the statements that I make, then just ask me instead of whining...

I'd rather not waste top notch Wisconsin cheese on your low quality whine...

[T. A. Gardner]

I have a question...

In the last 300 years which group / society that predominately follows which religion, has made the most scientific advances on the planet?

[Phantasmal]

I have a question...

In the last 300 years which group / society that predominately follows which religion, has made the most scientific advances on the planet?

Agnostics! The religion of science is Agnosticism.

[TexanManWithPlans]

I'm noting some of them as you commit them... Instead of choosing to whine about it, you could choose to learn about what they are, how you are committing them, and how to avoid committing them...


If you wish to learn about the logic, science, mathematics, etc. behind the statements that I make, then just ask me instead of whining...

I'd rather not waste top notch Wisconsin cheese on your low quality whine...

You know nothing about critical thought or about science. You're not fooling anyone.

[TexanManWithPlans]

I have a question...

In the last 300 years which group / society that predominately follows which religion, has made the most scientific advances on the planet?

Atheism isn't a religion.

[T. A. Gardner]

Agnostics! The religion of science is Agnosticism.

Agnosticism isn't a religion. It refers to the state where one hasn't made a decision on religion.

[T. A. Gardner]

Atheism isn't a religion.

Yes it is. It is the religious belief there is no god. Atheists can't prove their position any more than Theists can. Both have to have a religious belief they are correct.

[Phantasmal]

Agnosticism isn't a religion. It refers to the state where one hasn't made a decision on religion.

It’s another joke, you really need to lighten up.

[TexanManWithPlans]

Yes it is. It is the religious belief there is no god. Atheists can't prove their position any more than Theists can. Both have to have a religious belief they are correct.

Calling atheism a "religion" is like calling "not collecting coins" a hobby.

[T. A. Gardner]

Calling atheism a "religion" is like calling "not collecting coins" a hobby.

Wrong analogy. It would be more like denying coins exist.

[TexanManWithPlans]

Wrong analogy. It would be more like denying coins exist.

Lol. No, because coins exist and gods do not.

[gfm7175]

You know nothing about critical thought or about science. You're not fooling anyone.

Inversion Fallacy.

[Into the Night]

Maybe you didn't reach high school. Maybe all the Sunday school hindered your ability to think critically.

You are not thinking critically. Now you are grabbing shit out of Wikipedia as your argument. Wikipedia summarily dismissed as a source. It's articles are too often incomplete, biased, or just plain wrong.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus

Nope. Wikipedia does not define science. Science uses no consensus. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. There is no voting bloc in science.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scie...climate_change

Nope. You cannot define 'climate change' with 'climate change'. You cannot define a word with itself. Circular definition. Try again.