CFM (09-21-2018)
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
CFM (09-21-2018)
Her credibility doesn't exist.
I wouldn't worry about Kavanaugh. He'll be confirmed. You should worry about the old Jewish bitch giving up the ghost and Trump getting to appoint another one. That will be a 6-3 right leaning Court and nothing you left wing America haters believe will ever be considered again in your or your kid's lifetime.
I'm not the one who's basing all of this on my feels, like you and other liberals are.
I'm basing my conclusion on the FACT that there is no E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E, which doesn't seem to matter to you or the liberals; because if it did, you and other liberals would be questioning the FACT that there is no evidence.
Would you be comfortable if you were accused of something, from over 30 years ago, and there was no evidence to support the accusation?
Would you just curl up, in a fetal position, and say: "Well; if she's accusing me, it must be true."??
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
yes you are. you are making conclusions where none is justified. I don't know what happened. Nor do you. But you have no problems suggesting she is not telling the truth. I have heard nothing from her, but you are not telling the truth. Making shit up and creating conclusions.
I've made up nothing and every one of my conclusions are based on what is or what is not available; because she's presented NOTHING except for an accusation.
But you and other liberals hate Trump so much, that you FEEL you have to believe her; no matter what facts there are or not.
Why are you suggesting she's telling the truth??
Present your facts and I'll look at them.
Would you be comfortable if you were accused of something, from over 30 years ago, and there was no evidence to support the accusation?
Would you just curl up, in a fetal position, and say: "Well; if she's accusing me, it must be true."
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
you do not know what is available as evidence. Nor do I. but you have no trouble claiming it does not exist. typical righty idea of fairness.
The Repubs know there are people who were around then that will testify about it. For some reason, the Repugs do not want to allow them to have their say. i guess you think that is in the interest of fairness and justice. Allowing all sides to speak is just so unfair.
happened 30 years ago. What should they find "fingerprints'? Your repeating what evidence is inane. This distils down to witnesses and people who were told long ago. There are plenty of women who will back her. Repubs will not allow them to testify. her shrink said she told him 5 years ago. Not permitted to speak. All they will permit is the Repub senators, all men with their minds made up to question her. Now they are thinking about having an outside lawyer, A woman, ask their questions for them. that would fool you. She will be having a script and prescribed questions. What punks, hiding behind a woman.
The FBI investigates nominees are a regular part of their duties. they are the Federal Bureau of INVESTGATION after all. Repubs are blocking it.
You do not know what is available as evidence. Nor do I. but you have no trouble claiming it does exist. typical liberal idea of fairness.
The Democrats know there are people who were around then that will testify for Kavanaugh; for some reason, Democrats only want to listen to Ford's unsupported accusation.
I guess you think that is in the interest of fairness and justice. Only believing in Ford's side; is just so unfair.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
Bottom line right now is: One side is asking for an FBI investigation to find out if more can be found...and the other side is doing everything it can to prevent the FBI from investigating and finding more.
The charge was made by Ford who knew Kavanaugh...and knew Judge whom she identified as a witness and an enabler. One side wants Judge to testify and one side does not.
Which side is acting more like the party trying to hide something?
Let’s be clear about something
Ford testifying and the FBI investigating are mutually exclusive
One is not predicated on the other
Even those she said were there don't believe her.
“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.” - Patrick J. Smyth, classmate of Brett Kavanaugh
Bookmarks