Ford lawyers say she is open to testifying, but not Monday

[Irish Exit]

(CNN)Christine Blasey Ford opened the possibility she would testify before Congress about her accusation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

An email her lawyers sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee said Ford "would be prepared to testify next week" if the senators offer her "terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."
The message came a day ahead of a 10 a.m. Friday deadline set by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley for Ford to decide whether she would appear before a hearing he set for Monday.

Testifying Monday, however, "is not possible and the Committee's insistence that it occur then is arbitrary in any event," Ford's lawyers wrote.
"As you are aware, she has been receiving death threats, which have been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and she and her family have been forced out of their home," the email said. "She wishes to testify, provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety.

Translation: Gotta get botox and them tits done before I appear on national TV

[PoliTalker]

Hello floridafan,

Times have changed in the past 27 years, and the women's vote today is crucial. All we need are a couple of GOP Senators to vote against him, and its over.

Missing John McCain already.

[archives]

Translation: Gotta get botox and them tits done before I appear on national TV

The 1950"s called, their looking for you

[USFREEDOM911]

What a fucking hack.

Kill yourself.




Her account is evidence you stupid motherfucker.

If this was an investigation, her account and statement would be submitted as a piece of evidence by a prosecutor. Even the old shits who watch Law & Order every day know that.

You're just a piece of white trash.

Are you saying that the only evidence needed is an accusation; because she has NOTHING else.

[USFREEDOM911]

Why is it that you're so eager to believe the victims of sexual assault by Catholic Priests from decades ago, but not the victims of sexual assault by Conservatives from decades ago?

The answer is you're a fucking hack.

Are any of them nominated for SCOTUS??

[Irish Exit]

The 1950"s called, their looking for you

Your grammar teachers called, they're looking for you.

[USFREEDOM911]

Then you should be the first person to be calling for the FBI to investigate because lying to the FBI carries a mandatory prison sentence.

Liar.

Section 1621 covers general perjury, and stipulates that anyone who "willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true" is guilty of perjury and shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years, or both.

Section 1001 covers false statements more generally, without requiring an oath. The section stipulates that "whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the government of the United States, knowingly and willfully" falsifies or conceals information, including before a congressional committee's inquiry, may also be fined or imprisoned up to five years.

But I don't expect an un-American DNC agitator plant, like you, to know how the law words in the US; because you're used to the laws of your foreign government.

[USFREEDOM911]

We are back to the same question: If she is lying why would she want an FBI investigation?
No one would ever want that if they were lying.

The DNC told her that they would protect her, no matter what.

[USFREEDOM911]

Let's see that link. It's an internet poll, isn't it? Or did you just make it up? Whatever it is, I'm sure you're exercising bad faith in how you're relaying the information.

That's because you're a fucking hack and you know it.

Stop trying to be a foreign influence in the politics of the US, you DNC foreign agitator plant.

[archives]

Are any of them nominated for SCOTUS??

Makes a point, why is there a rush to approve a person to a life time position on the SCOTUS? The Founding Fathers considered it important, so why the big hurry to quickly dismiss a sexual accusation, especially given that the current appointee has all the votes he needs to be confirmed at any time? He is "nominated to SCOTUS"

[archives]

Your grammar teachers called, they're looking for you.

Yeah, but tomorrow morning they will still be looking for me and you will be still stuck in the 1950's

[floridafan]

The DNC told her that they would protect her, no matter what.

If she lies to the FBI, no one can protect her. Now, a guilty person does not ask for an FBI investigation.

[USFREEDOM911]

As I said before, a private citizen, one with no experience in the routine, appearing in front of a partisan Congressional Committee who litigate everything, to give testimony on a week's notice is inane.

Grassley knew that when he offered the invitation, and was thinking it was his way out, problem is now it has backfired on him, if he goes ahead it will be quickly framed to reflect that the GOP didn't care about giving a women's request to be heard in a sexual assault claim, as I noted, not good politically

Are you suggesting that she's so stupid, that she FELT that all she had to do is make an "accusation" and she was NEVER going to have to testify??

[USFREEDOM911]

She has a story to tell, which may be quite compelling. This is not a court of law, and the rules of law do not apply.

And what is this "long story", when she can't remember the date, where this "party" occurred, who else was there, how she got there, how she got home, or pretty much anything??

[TOP]

Are you suggesting that she's so stupid, that she FELT that all she had to do is make an "accusation" and she was NEVER going to have to testify??

I think that's what she believed...and Probably what they told (assured) her....then, everything fell apart....