If Kav was innocent he would want FBI investigation

[USFREEDOM911]

there have been rumors for years idiot, Ford didn't out this shit

Please show where Ford's info, had been rumored for years.

[USFREEDOM911]

yes she does

can you really be this ignorant?

And they are "WHO"??

[USFREEDOM911]

here ya go imbecile.............

Ford lawyer Lisa Banks said in a statement late Wednesday that Ford would cooperate with a thorough, nonpartisan probe. After indicating earlier this week that she would appear before lawmakers, Ford wants other witnesses — not just Ford and Kavanaugh — to participate and wants the FBI to reopen its background check of Kavanaugh. Those demands have been backed by Democrats but dismissed by top Republicans.

https://www.apnews.com/94771cd3dc304...-'fairness'

And who are the witnesses that she wants??

[USFREEDOM911]

his high school year book page ( written by him)


mentions a sexual triangle (exactly what was attempted)


and massive drinking


exactly what is also claimed

AND...……………..what??


Did it mention Ford and Kavanaugh's name??

Have you ever been the middle of a meat sandwich??

[USFREEDOM911]

how do you know

the FBI has not investigated it yet

And the FBI has said there's no reason for them to do so; because there's NO EVIDENCE.

[USFREEDOM911]

Oh and BTW a woman at the school has already said that the attack was a well known event at the school

link

[USFREEDOM911]

well reporters started SHOWING UP AT HER DOOR

as soon as the republicans looked at the letter

How did the Republicans get it, since Feinstein was the only one she gave it to??

[USFREEDOM911]

there were three people in the room asshole

She originally said 5 / her and 4 boys!!

[USFREEDOM911]

Therapist notes say four boys in the room

ftfy

[USFREEDOM911]

http://wat-if.com/schoolmate-says-sh...augh-incident/


Schoolmate says she recalls hearing about alleged Kavanaugh incident
King has since taken down her Facebook post, which NBC News verified as having appeared on her account. She said on Twitter that she deleted it “because it served its purpose and I am now dealing with a slew of requests for interviews … Organizing how I want to proceed. Was not ready for that, not sure I am interested in pursuing. Thanks for reading.”
She later posted on Facebook: “To all media, I will not be doing anymore interviews. No more circus for me. To clarify my post: I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford mentions, and I stand by my support for Christine. That’s it. I don’t have more to say on the subject. Please don’t contact me further.”




that is the opposite of a retraction huh

so stop lying about this woman too assholes

OMG, ear witnesses.

So basically "hearsay".

[USFREEDOM911]

the American people are finding out about your guy

and there is NOTHING you can do about it

We can and are laughing at you, the DNC, and liberals in general.

[Nordberg]

OMG, ear witnesses.

So basically "hearsay".

what kind of evidence could have survived 30 plus years? Do you ever think? This boils down to her word against his and all the corroborating witnesses she has. She has her shrink she told about it 5 years ago. She has girls who were there saying they heard about contempoporaneously. She has friends who were told long ago . She has lots of people who will attest to her honesty. But Repugs will not allow them to speak. Wonder why? Not truth, justice and the American way. just punky right wing politics with horrible desire to run the country betyond the reach of laws.

[USFREEDOM911]

I think Democrats need to stop shitting themselves over Kav. First playing payback Garland isn't getting them anywhere. Blame that on Hillary for fucking up and snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Second a conservative jurist will be seated regardless of whether Kav gets seated or not or before the midterms or not.

Yes, that could mean Roe vs Wade being over turned....but that's a careful what you ask for...you might get it situation. There are long standing culture wars issues that conservative politicians have advocated that a large majority (as in 75% or more) of the American population oppose.

Once conservatives have a solid conservative majority on the court there will be tremendous pressure to bring cases before the Supreme Court on those issues. Ruling against those issues could have serious political backlash on the GOP. Thus I doubt you'll see any radical changes. Which again could put GOP politicians on the hot seat with the conservative wing of the party.

Remember something Democrats have going for them. Republicans run on government being the problem, get elected and prove it. LOL

So if a GOP Scotus would overturn Roe v Wade and send women back to the coat hanger era you'd probably see a political backlash on the GOP that would place them in the political minority for a generation or more. That's why I tend to doubt that would happen.

So relax everyone, just as Trump getting elected hasn't destroyed America and with his most significant accomplishments being providing comedy for late night talk show hosts, the world hasn't ended. So it shall be with Kav becoming an associate Justice.

I don't think Roe vs Wade will be "overturned"; but it may modified, to cover medical conditions, rape, incest, etc..

[USFREEDOM911]

Professor Ford is being accused of lying about the incident in which she claims she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh.

I ask you...does a liar ask for an FBI investigation of her claims?

Ofcourse not

Who's saying the FBI is look into her "claim".

Are you saying that not one woman has ever submitted a false accusation, it resulted in convictions, and then later it was found to be false.

[USFREEDOM911]

One thing the FBI can do that local PD cannot is subpoena witnesses.

Like Judge.

Who was there.

The local PD can't ask a Prosecutor to subpoena witnesses??