Carter Page was working for the FBI?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...sa-jake-tapper
Carter Page was working for the FBI?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...sa-jake-tapper
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Carter Page was an FBI Under-Cover Employee in 2013, and remained the primary FBI witness through May of 2016 throughout the case.
If Carter Page was working as a UCE (FBI undercover employee), responsible for the bust of a high level Russian agent in 2013 -and remained a UCE- throughout the court case UP TO May of 2016, how is it possible that on October 21st 2016 Carter Page is put under a FISA Title 1 surveillance warrant as an alleged Russian agent?
Conclusion: He wasn’t. The DOJ National Security Division and the FBI Counterintelligence Division, knew he wasn’t. The DOJ-NSD and FBI flat-out LIED.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...urt-hes-a-spy/
That is not true, what was released was the FICA application with three additional renewals, together, it all amounts to over four hundred pages, and supposedly less than twenty pages are significant? And you don't think that is deliberate cherry picking? As I noted, their just looking for enough ambiguity to create a narrative
Nunes was never accurate, the released FISA application showed clearly in over two pages that the Court was told that Steele was likely looking for information to discredit the Trump campaign
And to deny that Page was under the FBI's radar prior to the dossier is absurd, the guy had questionable relationships dating back years, all of which the FISA application clearly showed. If you were to read the actual application and renewals rather than echoing talking points from conservative websites you'd see the facts right away
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthel.../optimized.pdf
Nunes said the footnoting never showed the sourcing was Steele,and he was correct in that it technically did, but only in a convoluted manner designed to obfuscate the fact Steel was paid by Fusion, which was paid by the law firm Hillary used to disguise the fact -claiming it was legal fees. ( small but significant point).
Schff kept complaining there wasn't enough info by Nunes either, but if you notice Schiff doen't dispute the Nunes memos findings. Thats' a red herring by Schiff -why you want to buy into it, when clearly Nunes got it right is beyond me
I thought it was just the 4th -I could be wrong- but most of the info was the same anyways, although each new FISA is supposed to be new info.
The new pages will speak for themselves. The reason Trump will not do a wholesale release is goons like Brennan are already screaming about "compromising nat. security" - which is laughable coming from th head of the cabal.
We''ll see the new releases soon enough. no use speculating on what they are
Page said he was constantly de-briefed on his travels by the FBI.And to deny that Page was under the FBI's radar prior to the dossier is absurd, the guy had questionable relationships dating back years, all of which the FISA application clearly showed. If you were to read the actual application and renewals rather than echoing talking points from conservative websites you'd see the facts right away
The FBI had Page employed as a UCE up to May of 2016
why in the hell did they THEN say he was a foreign agent? that's does not compute
The real reason Page was hit with the FISA was to cover up the already done spying by the FBI (informants)
run up on Trump priot to the EC date
"i should have fired him when i won the primaries"
lol. i love trump.
Don't need the footnote, the FISA application itself points out that the dossier was prepared purposely as information on the Trump campaign
Can't understand why you fail to see the Nunes memo for what it was, a personal interpretation of documents by Nunes, it wasn't any Committee document, but just Nunes own analysis, and it was full of framed conclusions of which most the actual FISA applications discredited
So because the FBI used Page at one point that means they didn't find him an individual of concern? Again, you show you have never read the actual FISA application, it is all in there, all the innuendos you are repeating are covered
When was the last time any President ordered the release of documents that have already been shown to the public without censored form that could directly involve details of an investigation in progress? You know it is absurd when Nunes has already hit the right wing airwaves claiming it should only take a couple of days, meaning, when it takes longer the regurgitation of "they are stalling" innuendo will play again
Lastly, as I noted, it is the same strategdy, start the accusations, frame a narrative, repeat it in the right wing media, and by the time it is discredited people will believe it is true. Seen it all before in Nunes memo, the IG report, release of the FISA applications, and here again
Naturally your low IQ did not allow you to comprehend the written word. The FBI believed that Page was a Russian agent. Quit being a dumb ass, and read sometime, if you can.
"We now have a clearer picture of why the FBI was watching former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, after the Justice Department released previously classified documents related to the FBI’s request to conduct surveillance on him. House Republicans had said the FBI abused its power and misled judges in these surveillance applications, but the documents show the FBI had multiple reasons to believe Page was the subject of “targeted recruitment” by Russia in its efforts to undermine the 2016 presidential election and that he had been “collaborating and conspiring with the Russian government"
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Bookmarks