Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying

[PostmodernProphet]

They did it before with other nominees.

just like they did with Kavanaugh......its odd Feinstein didn't present this evidence to the FBI when they were actually investigating him.......

[USFREEDOM911]

It's not bullshit.

She took a lie detector.

He refuses.

It's obvious why.

Then she shouldn't have a problem in attending the hearing and telling the TRUTH.

[USFREEDOM911]

Ford said she'll testify after the FBI investigates.

They investigated Thomas/Hill, so why shouldn't they investigate here?

They've already said they have no reason to "investigate"; so suck it up, buttercup. ;D

[PostmodernProphet]

are you a shut-n?

he's a shut up......

[USFREEDOM911]

Look at this desperate attempt at catching red herrings.

What a phony.

You can now stop trying to hide from the fact that you're not an American; because your own "logic" has shown what you truly are.

[USFREEDOM911]

Yup.

It just so happens you assholes make it so easy for us by picking the worst of the worst out there.

Keep praying; because God answers all prayers.

But sometime the answer is NO.

Obama - 2010 - “Elections have consequences.” It’s the political way for winners to tell losers: “Tough luck, you lost. Get over it.”

[PostmodernProphet]

this is simple.......if you want to investigate this petition the state where he went to high school to open a criminal investigation. If he is convicted you can impeach him. If no evidence is found, life goes on.......

[LV426]

What's obvious is you are oblivious to just what a polygraph test shows like blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while a person is asked and answers a series of questions. A polygraph can indicate that you're lying even if you are telling the truth, especially if the test is stressing you out. For this reason, polygraph results are no longer admissible as evidence in legal trials. So, if you are found guilty despite being innocent, it won't be because of a lie detector.

Well, they seem good enough to prove loyalty to Mike Pence, our Vice President. Or for Rand Paul, Republican Senator.

Rand Paul: Drumpf should use lie-detector tests to find anonymous op-ed author
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...nonymous-op-ed

Mike Pence Swears His Loyalty on the Sunday Shows
The vice president calls an anonymous anti-Drumpf op-ed in The New York Times “un-American” and says he’d take a polygraph “in a heartbeat” to prove he didn’t write it.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...tector/569725/

So good enough for loyalty to Trump, but not for the Senate Judiciary Committee? Wha?

[LV426]

Then she shouldn't have a problem in attending the hearing and telling the TRUTH.

Right after the FBI investigates, sure.

Gotta have an independent investigation by trained investigators, not Senators looking to score cheap political points on national TV.

[LV426]

They've already said they have no reason to "investigate";

No, Republicans say that.

No one else does.

All the Democrats are calling for an FBI investigation.

So is Dr. Ford.

The ones who don't want an FBI investigation are the ones who say one isn't necessary.

Since when is investigating the truth not necessary? When Trump's Presidency is at stake, it seems.

[Flash]

I don't want him seated, period.

Why the rush to get Bretty seated?

It's to protect Trump and the GOP from Mueller, isn't it?

Why not just be honest and say that's why you have to seat him now?

Kavanaugh was nominated July 10. Two months is not exactly a rush.

"According to the Congressional Research Service, the average number of days from nomination to final Senate vote since 1975 is 67 days."

It will probably be longer than 67 days before the final vote--longer than average.

Few people support Kavanaugh because of anything related to Mueller because nobody has a clue about how he would vote about any issue related to that or anything else. Based on the hypothetical at the hearings Kavanaugh made it clear he does not think the president is above the law.

[USFREEDOM911]

She took a lie detector; your guy refuses.

She wants the FBI to investigate; your guy refuses.

She's had this documented in therapist notes from years ago.

You guys have offered no proof of Bretty's innocence. He refuses to take a lie detector. His friend refuses to testify under oath in his defense.

Pretty obvious why.

Show me where she mentioned Kavanaugh to the therapist; but didn't she say the therapist was wrong about his notes on her group meeting; so are we to believe the therapist or not??

You do know that no one is required to provide proof of their innocence; because in America it's "innocent until PROVEN guilty".


But then, an un-American DNC agitator plant probably isn't aware of that; because in your country, it's guilty until proven innocent.

[LV426]

Keep praying; because God answers all prayers.

There is no God.

It's make-believe just like the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

When you die, your body decomposes and turns to dust.

Religion is man's construct, not any omnipotent being's.

What's more likely is that we live in a computer simulation.

[LV426]

Obama - 2010 - “Elections have consequences.” It’s the political way for winners to tell losers: “Tough luck, you lost. Get over it.”

Yup.

Which is why any Bretty vote should be delayed at least until after the Election, when the people have a chance to weigh in.

[LV426]

this is simple.......if you want to investigate this petition the state where he went to high school to open a criminal investigation. If he is convicted you can impeach him. If no evidence is found, life goes on.......

Why can't the FBI do that?

They did it for Thomas/Hill 27 years ago.

Why is this any different?