1. Go fuck yourself.
2. Go fuck yourself.
3. Go fuck yourself.
4. Go fuck yourself.
5. Go fuck yourself.
6. Go fuck yourself.
7. Go fuck yourself.
8. Go fuck yourself.
9. Go fuck yourself.
10. Take your entitlement and shove it up your fat ass...if you can fit it up there with your head.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Not mine...you're the ones who made this process partisan with what you did to Garland.
Now that the shoe's on the other foot, suddenly you're finding yourself in the unenviable position of having to eat a plate of your own bullshit.
You're the ones who changed the SCOTUS process and made it politically-based on elections. That's what you wanted.
Now, you seem to be signing a different tune.
Jesus fucking Christ...otomayor and Kagan had the votes, Garland did not. That is the job of the whips (and media) to count the votes in advance. If they don't have the votes they usually delay or cancel. If Garland had the votes the committee could have voted to call for hearings.
YOU DON'T NEED VOTES FOR A SENATE COMMITTEE HEARING OF A NOMINEE. All they vote on is to send his nomination to the Senate. They don't convene a vote to vote on having a hearing.
So you're lying either because you don't know the details, or you do and are acting in bad faith.
So which is it? Are you an ignoramus, or an asshole?
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
I asked how you felt about it. You are basing your opinion about whether the Senate should vote for confirmation on what "you all were arguing in 2016?"
Don't you have any independent views of your own. And I never argued any such crap as "giving the people a voice."
How are Republicans going to eat a plate of shit? It looks like they will vote on the confirmation.
What if they wait until after the election and the Democrats win the House but Republicans maintain control of the Senate. Does that mean the people want the Senate to confirm?
You offered nothing. You wanted to place conditions on me so that you could verify the claims that make up the basis of support for all your shitty arguments.
It's not on me to do anything for you to verify who you are. You should be doing that anyway. Otherwise, you're just another Conservative poseur.
Do you think that you can make personal claims about yourself, and we are just supposed to accept it? Why the fuck should anyone believe any shit you say about yourself anonymously on a message board?
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
You are lying. She did not go to the Washington Post anonymously. The post reporter claims to have been in contact with her
The post reporter honored her request not to go public with what she was told and it was off the record. But the Washington Post reporter most definitely knew who Ford was
Why do you lie?
I did. I acknowledged it.
I see what's happening here. You switched IDs, didn't you? OMG. So I was having this exact same discussion with "Teflon Don" before, and here you are making the exact same argument.
So what, you changed your ID because your previous argument with me fell apart when I showed how you misrepresented this whole thing? It's you, isn't it? LMAO! Wow.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Bookmarks