Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 86

Thread: The Good Old Days Of America's Healthcare System, Bring It Back

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilhelm Zenz View Post
    FDR TRIED TO create a medical insurance program, no one was laughing, people wanted it, its always been needed and the medical lobby has blocked it, you think we are the only nation in the developed world with no comprehensive system because it works? no everyone agrees it is a crime, a recent poll in canada asked which system they would prefer over 90% said their universal single payer system, youve been brain washed people go broke if they get cancer or some catestrophic illness ask old people if they want to get rid of medicare none will say they do, were you even alive in the 30s 40s and 50s by the wat those were new deal years there were medical programs back then National Health Insurance and the New Deal
    President Roosevelt continued to support national health reform throughout his terms. His second push for
    national health insurance came after the Social Security Act passed. However, the momentum from FDR’s
    Technical Committee on Medical Care and a National Health Conference were not enough to overcome a
    Congress that was no longer supportive of further government expansions.

    1954
    President Eisenhower proposes a federal reinsurance
    fund to enable private insurers to broaden the
    groups of people they would cover
    Maybe since you're so versed in America's healthcare history you can point to the constitutional authority for the federal government to be involved in America's healthcare?

    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." (Amendment 10, United States Constitution)
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    you arent smart enough to figure it out are you.
    I've figured it out it's you who haven't!
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,362
    Thanks
    72,407
    Thanked 35,729 Times in 27,216 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,585 Times in 18,174 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    And medical science has advanced, your point is?
    then we cant go back to the days of the town Dr huh


    we can go back to dying much younger

    that is what you idiots are asking us to do


    the people say no thanks and have said no thanks for years now


    So the republican party cheats in elections to protect medical insurance Companies profits

    Once you assholes cant STEAL elections we will get universal care

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,362
    Thanks
    72,407
    Thanked 35,729 Times in 27,216 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,585 Times in 18,174 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    Maybe since you're so versed in America's healthcare history you can point to the constitutional authority for the federal government to be involved in America's healthcare?

    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." (Amendment 10, United States Constitution)

    general welfare

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,362
    Thanks
    72,407
    Thanked 35,729 Times in 27,216 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,585 Times in 18,174 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    there in fact is a socialistic program written right into the constitution by the founders themselves

    the post office


    the founders showed themselves that the constitution allows for such programs

  6. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    West end Of The Erie Canal
    Posts
    2,322
    Thanks
    290
    Thanked 737 Times in 591 Posts
    Groans
    67
    Groaned 371 Times in 328 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    of course, we do. It is a huge program.
    We do not need government run healthcare. Especially considering it delivers shitty care and say buh bye to any new research and innovations, asshole!

    THE OFFICIAL FLAG OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

  7. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    West end Of The Erie Canal
    Posts
    2,322
    Thanks
    290
    Thanked 737 Times in 591 Posts
    Groans
    67
    Groaned 371 Times in 328 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    general welfare
    Hey shit for brains, IT DOES NOT MEAN THE GOVERNMENT IS TO TAKE CARE OF US FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE,
    YOU GOT THAT YOU LYING CUNT?!?!?!?!?!

    THE OFFICIAL FLAG OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

  8. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    24,141
    Thanks
    3,164
    Thanked 10,046 Times in 7,483 Posts
    Groans
    49
    Groaned 1,102 Times in 1,047 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    What's your response to that?
    Comparing Democrats to Republicans is a false equivalency, but fear not.

    The traditional centrist Democrats are going down.

    You certainly won't mistake the new social Democrats as Republicans-Lite.

  9. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,877
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,793 Times in 17,243 Posts
    Groans
    5,329
    Groaned 4,593 Times in 4,271 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boris The Animal View Post
    We do not need government run healthcare. Especially considering it delivers shitty care and say buh bye to any new research and innovations, asshole!
    Better care. cheaper and covers everyone. A profit making healthcare system will reward the greedy. they will take money out of the sick and injured for fun and profit. Desperate people will pay whatever they have to to survive. When they recover, they are broke and maybe homeless. But at least insurance companies will get richer and richer. In the last 15 years, healthcare costs have gone up over 220 percent. that corrected for inflation. we are being looted.

  10. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    cleveland
    Posts
    254
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 6 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boris The Animal View Post
    But it doesn't mean we have to use big government cookie cutter approaches either.
    i wish you engage in an assiciation fallacy your argument if one can call it that is invalid

  11. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    cleveland
    Posts
    254
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 6 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    Since FDR they had tried to create a Medical program for americans, our system has always been lacking, and that is proof, the ama stops progress

  12. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    general welfare
    “If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress…. Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America.” (James Madison)

    To lay taxes to provide for the general welfare of the United States, that is to say, “to lay taxes for the purpose of providing for the general welfare.” For the laying of taxes is the power, and the general welfare the purpose for which the power is to be exercised. They are not to lay taxes ad libitum for any purpose they please; but only to pay the debts or provide for the welfare of the Union. In like manner, they are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase, not as describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and independent power to do any act they please, which might be for the good of the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless.
    1. It would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and, as they would be the sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please. (Thomas Jefferson)
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  13. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,877
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,793 Times in 17,243 Posts
    Groans
    5,329
    Groaned 4,593 Times in 4,271 Posts

    Default

    Good argument. the national government should qualify teachers and nationally judge curricula. Lots of jobs are national or international in nature and it is good to have the same educational systems in every state. You should be able to move to another state and have similar educational experiences.
    And that argument about sole decisions is poor. the national government is not a person, but a collection of seemingly expert people trying to elevate education. You can also argue that by voting for these people, the American population is involved . they too are part of the decision making process.

  14. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    West end Of The Erie Canal
    Posts
    2,322
    Thanks
    290
    Thanked 737 Times in 591 Posts
    Groans
    67
    Groaned 371 Times in 328 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Better care. cheaper and covers everyone. A profit making healthcare system will reward the greedy. they will take money out of the sick and injured for fun and profit. Desperate people will pay whatever they have to to survive. When they recover, they are broke and maybe homeless. But at least insurance companies will get richer and richer. In the last 15 years, healthcare costs have gone up over 220 percent. that corrected for inflation. we are being looted.
    No, government run healthcare where everything is nationalized, like you want, delivers substandard shit quality and say buh bye to any new innovations because they won't be allowed in your "Brave New World".

    THE OFFICIAL FLAG OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

  15. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,877
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,793 Times in 17,243 Posts
    Groans
    5,329
    Groaned 4,593 Times in 4,271 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boris The Animal View Post
    No, government run healthcare where everything is nationalized, like you want, delivers substandard shit quality and say buh bye to any new innovations because they won't be allowed in your "Brave New World".
    Wrong again, or is it still. the US is at the bottom of healthcare ratings in industrialized nations, dead bottom. By any measurements, they get better health care than we do and better results. And much, much cheaper. When taiwan was going to install a national heath care system, they visited the US to see what they should NOt do.

    It is time for the us to nationalize healthcare and save poor disgruntled taxpayers like you a lot of money and provide better healthcare. You will thank us.

    then we can nationalize banks.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-19-2016, 08:15 AM
  2. APP - Should we bring market driven economics into healthcare
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-06-2013, 11:56 AM
  3. Replies: 52
    Last Post: 09-18-2009, 09:40 PM
  4. Healthcare system bailout coming?
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-28-2008, 08:56 AM
  5. Let me propose a healthcare system
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-24-2007, 08:39 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •