HAHA. Gun-hating Senator Kamala Harris gets armed bodyguards paid by taxpayers

[Text Drivers are Killers]

All the democrats are like this. Anti-gun for you but pro-gun for themselves

https://www.breitbart.com/california...kamala-harris/

7 Sep 2018An examination of expense reports reveal gun control Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) received taxpayer-funded armed protection from the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) in 2017 and 2018 at events throughout the state.
NBC 4 reports that the protection was “unprecedented” in that it went beyond the security which the LAPD usually provides “for dignitaries and officials visiting LA.” Taxes from residents of Los Angeles funded armed security personnel to protect Harris not only in LA but in other cities throughout the state as well.

Taxpayers even paid for armed security to go with Harris to a party.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

And libs tell us guns are useless for self-defense!!!! Whenever you are attacked, call 911. But they want their guns.

[archives]

All the democrats are like this. Anti-gun for you but pro-gun for themselves

How many times in different form have we seen this same lame post?

Easy to ping pong, if guns are so good for everyone, why aren't they allowed on the floor of Congress which is controlled by gun hugging Republicans? If more guns make us safe, and the US has mearly as many guns as people, how come we're not the safest nation in the world? Should I go on?

[Jade Dragon]

How many times in different form have we seen this same lame post?

Easy to ping pong, if guns are so good for everyone, why aren't they allowed on the floor of Congress which is controlled by gun hugging Republicans? If more guns make us safe, and the US has mearly as many guns as people, how come we're not the safest nation in the world? Should I go on?

Also if guns make us safer, why don't the gun nuts go live in a war zone? That's kind of what you get when everyone has guns, and yet they push for it. So every one that pushes guns for just about everyone, should have to go live in a war zone, and tell us what it's like when everyone has a gun.

[Rune]

How many times in different form have we seen this same lame post?

Easy to ping pong, if guns are so good for everyone, why aren't they allowed on the floor of Congress which is controlled by gun hugging Republicans? If more guns make us safe, and the US has mearly as many guns as people, how come we're not the safest nation in the world? Should I go on?

It is the safest country in terms of immunity from foreign invasion, which is one of the main points of the 2nd, but yeah, go on.

[SmarterthanYou]

How many times in different form have we seen this same lame post?

Easy to ping pong, if guns are so good for everyone, why aren't they allowed on the floor of Congress which is controlled by gun hugging Republicans? Should I go on?

you really need an answer to that stupid assed question? both of them?

[reagansghost]

All the democrats are like this. Anti-gun for you but pro-gun for themselves

probably your stupidest post yet

[Jade Dragon]

Texty is too dumb to understand that all senators, figure heads, etc are normally given guards whether they ask, or not. It's part of the job, so quit waling like a dingus.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Texty is too dumb to understand that all senators, figure heads, etc are normally given guards whether they ask, or not. It's part of the job, so quit waling like a dingus.

The ones who are anti-gun should refuse armed body-guards. THINK

[Minister of Truth]

Texty is too dumb to understand that all senators, figure heads, etc are normally given guards whether they ask, or not. It's part of the job, so quit waling like a dingus.

I'd still like to see anti-Bill of Rights politicians give-up their guns.

[NiftyNiblick]

I am one progressive liberal who isn't hot to trot about the firearms issue, one way or another.
I own a few firearms myself.

But if I were a true gun nut, I'd genuinely despair at the intellectual bankruptcy of the brain-dead troglodytes supporting the gun lobby.

And if I were a big anti-gun guy, I'd despair at the lack of knowledge that the anti-gun advocates have about firearms.
Don't get into the debate without knowing the subject matter, guys. It only helps the other side.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

I am one progressive liberal who isn't hot to trot about the firearms issue, one way or another.
I own a few firearms myself.

HAHAHA. Shut up you pathetic liar. You never even touched a gun in your life. But i'm sure you have a couple of 6000 pound SUV assault vehicles that you routinely drive 120 mph and don't care how many people you murder.

[domer76]

HAHAHA. Shut up you pathetic liar. You never even touched a gun in your life. But i'm sure you have a couple of 6000 pound SUV assault vehicles that you routinely drive 120 mph and don't care how many people you murder.

^It never takes more than a few posts before some barrel-stroking idiot makes the absurd car/gun analogy. That it is the stupidest cocksucker on the forum is no surprise.

[CFM]

^It never takes more than a few posts before some barrel-stroking idiot makes the absurd car/gun analogy. That it is the stupidest cocksucker on the forum is no surprise.

Yet you can't explain how someone killed by a car is less dead than someone killed by a gun.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

^It never takes more than a few posts before some barrel-stroking idiot makes the absurd car/gun analogy. .

HAHAHA. So the gun/car analogy is absurd??? No - the two are a good match and you know it. Problem is you have no answer. You want to ban guns because you think it might save a few hundred lives a year but if someone suggest merely lowering speed limits back to 55 you refuse even though such a move would save THOUSANDS of lives a year,.