Members banned from this thread: SmarterthanYou, USFREEDOM911, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Granule, canceled.2021.1, Boris The Animal, canceled.2021.2, MAGA MAN, iewitness, Irish, CFM, Ralph, Bigdog, TTQ64, Getin the ring, zymurgy, Superfreak, PraiseKek, Eagle_Eye, katzgar, countryboy, volsrock, The Ugly Truth, BodyDouble, Mitchthomas20172017, coolzone, rhym3pays and LV426


Page 23 of 23 FirstFirst ... 131920212223
Results 331 to 339 of 339

Thread: We need Socialism. Socialism Is A Good Thing. Socialism Promotes The General Welfare.

  1. #331 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cymru/'Wales'
    Posts
    8,017
    Thanks
    4,017
    Thanked 3,456 Times in 2,386 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 941 Times in 861 Posts

    Default

    All advanced capitalist states have things like relatively decent health care - they have to, or the system would be overthrown tomorrow. The USA, as the centre of world capitalism, can afford to brainwash its masses instead. Socialism is control of the economy by the vast majority who do the work.

  2. #332 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Uncensored2008,

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Hello Politalker;

    Thank you for your reasoned and well thought out response.
    You're quite welcome. My pleasure.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Socialism as promoted by Marx
    OK, so we are talking about two different kinds of socialism. I am talking about the kind of socialism in the USA and other capitalist industrialized nations. The kind of socialism, that when liberals want tuition-paid college or universal health care, and conservatives say 'That's socialism!'

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    On the scale of a country, socialism fails every time it is employed.
    Seems to have so far, but some socialist nations endure none the less.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Promoters of socialism like to point to the Nordic social democracies as evidence of success. But the Nordic nations are neither socialist nor particularly successful.
    What they have is commonly referred to as socialism. That is the definition I was using when I penned this Thread. The Nordic countries are quite successful. Norway has no debt.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Before we go on, what exactly IS socialism anyway? Simply stated, it is the control of the means of production by the state.
    The classic dictionary definition has, like so many English words, lagged behind the common usage meaning.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Generally, even in the Nordic nation states, this involves autocratic rule. We will get to why that is and must be, in a moment. So control of the means of production, this means the government regulates or outright owns all of the elements in a society that produce. Based on such a definition, only St. Petersburg in 1922-23 under the "Grand Experiment" and Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge were actually socialist. Both resulted in millions dead and brutality beyond human comprehension. Not a rousing endorsement of socialism.

    So a modified view is adopted by most economists, myself included. If 50% of the means of production are controlled by the state, the nation is Socialist. Hence Venezuela is, Norway is not. Remember that I said the Social Democracies are not and have never been socialist.
    Problem is, you're speaking a different language than most of us are.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    None of them have ever seized control of more than half of their economies. They are instead "welfare states." Welfare elements are supported by the free economies. In the Nordic States, this has led to collapse with most of them severely rolling back the welfare element that cripples them. Even the most radical of the welfare states is rolling it back. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/w...o-a-fault.html
    From your link: "the Danes get a cradle-to-grave safety net that includes free health care, a free university education and hefty payouts to even the richest citizens." Payouts to the richest? That does not sound workable long term.


    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Now that we have dealt with typical red herring of Marxists and dispelled with the Nordic states, we can deal with actual socialism.
    The red herring is this musical definition of socialism, ever-changing to suit the argument. Liberals want public education to include K-16 and conservatives say: 'That's socialism!' Liberals embrace the term; and then it changes. Oh, that's not socialism, now. Enough of the goal post moving.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Socialism revolves around two concepts, central planning and collectivism. Collectivism is the idea that the individual is of little or no consequence and that the group is what matters.
    The group of what? Individuals? So if everybody has similar needs and they see to them on a volume basis, then that is good for all the individuals. The concept is to use the power of the group to provide the needs for individuals. Individuals are at the core of the priorities.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    I mentioned earlier that socialism is autocratic by nature; this is why. Individualism is suppress under socialism as the group is preeminent.
    This occurs within any free society that has laws. Individuals are not allowed to do as they please if what they want to do harms other individuals.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    As Marx wrote "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one." (no, it wasn't Spock, he was quoting Marx). Under socialism, a person is just a resource for the state to utilize.
    Not true. If you're going to refer to Marx, then quote him accurately. He never said that.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Let's say Joe is a welder. Under socialism the group "welder" has value as a resource to be used, but Joe has no particular value. He is just a part that can be replaced by any other part of type "welder." Under socialism, people have no value. This is one of the reasons that atrocities are virtually universal under socialism. Since the individual is no more important than a seed or a wrench, disposing of the individual by killing them is not seen as immoral. Socialism does not have any place for morality, obedience to the state is the only true law.
    That's ridiculous. Now you're just recanting highly biased conservative impressions of communism.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    The second element is central planning. This is simply the rulers deciding what people do and don't need or deserve. Instead of a person deciding that they want a new 60" flat screen, the rulers decide that all proles will be given 23" displays which carry only MSNBC to regurgitate state ideals to the masses. Because individuals have no worth under socialism, the desires of individuals are suppressed, usually violently and fatally by the rulers of the state. What is produced is directed by the state, what a particular drone may have assigned to them is decided by the state. In many cased drones are dressed in uniforms, as China and Vietnam did.
    This exemplifies why conservatives have to re-write what liberals say. No liberal has advocated for the above situation to become reality in the USA. The above would require our Constitution to be scrapped. Liberals are not arguing to toss out the Constitution. Individuals have rights. Individuals are valued. Really, you have launched into an intricate straw man argument with this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Socialism is the destruction of the individual. The ultimate aim is to subdue and eradicate individual identity and create a society of perfect slaves who are unthinking in absolute obedience to the state.
    My, you make it sound so terrible, nobody in their right mind would want that. Funny thing is nobody in their right mind does want that, and it is not what I, nor any of the other liberals posting to this thread have advocated for.

    Why don't you back up and tell us why we should not extend K-12 to K-16 for those who get good grades. Forget about whether it is socialism or not. That's one of the things we want. It would pay for itself in increased productivity and resultant revenue. It makes sense. We should do it. What possible argument can be made for having a dumb populace? We want the smartest populace we can produce. Our nation will be better for it, and so will life for individuals.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (10-18-2018)

  4. #333 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,291
    Thanks
    77,752
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,677
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    "Why don't you back up and tell us why we should not extend K-12 to K-16 for those who get good grades. Forget about whether it is socialism or not."

    No, we won't forget that it's socialistic. It's already extended for those who can qualify and can pay the freight.

    Why should I pay for my children's college education and someone that I don't even know?

    More incrementalism.

  5. #334 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    3 Examples of Americans who were highly motivated to do great things for the free world, not for money or the profit motive, but because they wanted to make a great contribution to our society:

    1. Jonas Salk. A doctor who developed the vaccine for polio. Had he sold his invention, he could have been fabulously wealthy. Instead, he gave it away for free. When asked "Who owns this patent?", Salk replied, "Well, the people I would say. There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?" The vaccine is calculated to be worth $7 billion had it been patented. An unabashed capitalist would consider this genius an idiot.

    2. Alfred Loomis. A Lt Col in WWI, he later became an investment banker in the 1920's investing in the electric companies which were establishing the electrical grid in the USA. He correctly foresaw the coming crash and in 1928 liquidated everything. Then, after the crash he became very wealthy buying up devalued stocks when nobody else had the cash to do it. Then, he took his considerable wealth and funded his own state of the art science lab which was superior to most universities. There, with a team he hired, he developed RADAR, LORAN, and Radar-guidance for automatic AA guns which were instrumental in winning WWII. He didn't do it for the money. He used his own money. He did it because he wanted to make this contribution to the free world. His weapons were instrumental in the defense of Britain from the German Luftwaffe.

    3. Nikola Tesla. An inventor who first developed the AC electrical motor. He never worried about trying to sell his invention. He figured Thomas Edison would know how to do that, as he greatly admired Edison. He went to work with Edison and told him of his invention, and how superior AC Power was to DC Power, because AC Power could be transmitted over far greater distances without voltage loss. Edison had already invested heavily in DC Power, so he tried to discourage Tesla. Tesla quit and sought someone to fund his project. George Westinghouse took him up on it, but insisted Tesla give him all the rights for a one-time price. Had Tesla simply asked for a small royalty on the future profits of AC Power, he would have been fabulously wealthy, but Tesla agreed to Westinghouse's offer. Tesla, you see, just wanted his invention to get used for good. Westinghouse, of course, was the one to get fabulously rich from DC Power. Tesla simply wanted to go on working on new projects to help the public, which he did.

    None of these 3 people were motivated to do what they did by the profit motive. They all shared a simple desire to advance technology to help the free world. Seeing their work do good was enough of a reward for them. The story of Tesla and Edison is remarkable. Edison was the capitalist. He did what he did for money. Tesla didn't care about profits. Edison was the fool who let Tesla slip through his fingers because he was too greedy to give up on a profit-producing DC Power system he had already developed. Had he looked at Tesla's invention with an open mind, he would have realized he needed to give up on DC Power, which was only capable of providing electrical power for a few blocks nearby a generating station, and developed what Tesla had. Too bad he just couldn't think big enough. He was constrained by the shackles of the profit motive.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  6. #335 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,253
    Thanks
    13,544
    Thanked 12,185 Times in 7,629 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,051 Times in 998 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    "Why don't you back up and tell us why we should not extend K-12 to K-16 for those who get good grades. Forget about whether it is socialism or not."

    No, we won't forget that it's socialistic. It's already extended for those who can qualify and can pay the freight.

    Why should I pay for my children's college education and someone that I don't even know?

    More incrementalism.
    Because educating our youth...EVEN THE ONES WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE EDUCATION...helps make America and the world a better place.

    Oh, wait a second...I guess that does not matter to someone like you.
    Last edited by Frank Apisa; 03-10-2019 at 07:53 AM.

  7. #336 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    If we tax the rich more and pay for tuition for college for anyone who can get the good grades to stay in, then we will have more smart people in the USA and be better able to compete in the world market.

    We use socialism to advance our capitalism.

    Everybody wins.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (03-10-2019)

  9. #337 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,527
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,569 Times in 17,095 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Americans see the universities as the oven where new ideas are cooked up. Then we make it so damn expensive that many people are priced out. K thru 12 is understood as a benefit to society. People should have access to top education to become better informed citizens and more valuable contributors. But the profit motive trumps all in America. College should be far cheaper.
    When I first started going I was paying 16 bucks a credit hour. It was easily affordable. Most jobs you got would pay for, or help pay for schooling. It was absolutely not a crippling cost that would impact your life for decades.
    We made a wrong move in education and the profits being made will prevent us from fixing it. America will suffer for it in the future.
    Last edited by Nordberg; 03-10-2019 at 07:14 PM.

  10. #338 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Nordberg,

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Americans see the universities as the oven where new ideas are cooked up. Then we make it so damn expensive that many people are priced out. K thru 12 is understood as a benefit to society. People should have access to top education to become better informed citizens and more valuable contributors. But the profit motive trumps all in America. College should be far cheaper.
    When I first started going I was paying 16 bucks a credit hour. It was easily affordable. Most jobs you got would pay for, or help pay for schooling. It was absolutely not a crippling cost that would impact your life for decades.
    We made a wrong move in education and the profits being made will prevent us from fixing it. America will suffer for it in the future.
    Totally agree.

    It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to understand that education of the populace benefits the nation.

    Education of the populace is in the nation's best interest, benefits society and the economy, makes the USA stronger, greater.

    It is in the interest of the USA to have free public education from K thru 16, as long as the students are achieving good grades. Those students who do not learn, and only disrupt the education of others, should be removed from classes and shunted into programs for problem children.

    Our schools should absolutely teach how our nation functions, and the importance of voting and staying properly politically informed and engaged in the process which decides their own fate.

    Students should learn how big money works against our democracy, erodes our system of government.

    They should learn that big money feeds on political apathy, that it actually seeks to limit voter turnout.

    They should learn to realize how crucial it is that they vote in each and every election.

    They should learn that we need to fight for our freedom from the strangling power of big corporations just as much as from overbearing government.

    They should learn that we can have freedom with socialism and capitalism mixed together in the correct balance, socialism for needs, capitalism for wants.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  11. #339 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Everybody knows there are good jobs and bad jobs. Some jobs really suck. Low pay, no benefits, hard work, unpredictable hours, no guaranteed minimum hours per week, no vacation, no sick days, no exceptions, no pride, no sense of accomplishment, and no job security.

    Capitalism seeks to make jobs as bad as possible. Whatever capitalists can get away with is what they will try to get away with. The less capitalists give to workers, the more profits they earn.

    The only thing standing between the ruthless capitalists and oppression of workers is government. Capitalism has no goal of making jobs good. That's not the point of capitalism. It would only do that if it was forced to by market forces (happens only at the top,) or government regulation.

    It takes all the jobs in society to make our nation function. All jobs should be something a person can live on and be proud to work at. There shouldn't be any jobs that actually create poverty. That's what good regulation should do. All jobs should be good jobs. We aren't even close to that. We've got a lot of work to do. Fighting against regulation itself, as if it's a bad thing, is not productive. Conservatives should be ashamed for that.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

Similar Threads

  1. Ohio Car Dealers: "Competition BAD...Socialism GOOD!"
    By ZappasGuitar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 02-13-2014, 06:40 PM
  2. On second thought mate socialism is a pretty good deal
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-04-2012, 12:23 PM
  3. If this is Socialism....
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-18-2012, 07:26 AM
  4. Got Socialism?!!
    By signalmankenneth in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 03:01 PM
  5. Why Socialism?
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 10-01-2010, 02:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •