Members banned from this thread: SmarterthanYou, USFREEDOM911, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Granule, canceled.2021.1, Boris The Animal, canceled.2021.2, MAGA MAN, iewitness, Irish, CFM, Ralph, Bigdog, TTQ64, Getin the ring, zymurgy, Superfreak, PraiseKek, Eagle_Eye, katzgar, countryboy, volsrock, The Ugly Truth, BodyDouble, Mitchthomas20172017, coolzone, rhym3pays and LV426


Page 1 of 23 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 339

Thread: We need Socialism. Socialism Is A Good Thing. Socialism Promotes The General Welfare.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default We need Socialism. Socialism Is A Good Thing. Socialism Promotes The General Welfare.

    There is a long standing Conservative Myth that we have to choose between socialism and capitalism. Some say socialism is like a cancerous disease that, once begun, grows and grows until it chokes capitalism to death and destroys the economy.

    False and false.

    Socialism is working very well in most industrialized nations. The USA is the only highly industrialized nation which does not have a socialist universal health care system.

    We have had socialism in the USA for a long time now.

    Even back when most Trump supporters would say 'America was great.' (the 1950's?)

    We had social security and a minimum wage. Neither of those things is the result of capitalism.

    The (socialism again) GI Bill saved millions of returning American vets from poverty. It allowed them to get an education, get a job, get a mortgage, get a home, and build wealth. (White Americans, anyway - blacks were redlined OUT of home ownership, the primary vehicle to wealth for most Americans.)

    FDR: One of the greatest Presidents ever. He brought us through the big war, brought us socialism to save us from the ravages of Great Depression.

    Socialism has lots of promises and benefits but socialism cannot be our only solution.

    Capitalism is our primary wealth generator. Capitalism is a powerful engine of motivation and productivity.

    How do we decide between the two?

    That's a trick question.

    We don't have to pick one.

    We can have BOTH!

    We already do.

    The trick is to get the correct balance between the two. We just need the proper blend of capitalism and socialism. We can work jobs, pay into the system, and let the system take care of the needy. Everyone wins!

    We need to be talking more and more about how socialism can work for us. We need to move beyond the limiting old Conservative Myths that are supporting the Class War and wealth extraction.

    Corporations and the super-rich extract far more of our wealth than socialism. We need to face up to the facts here. The government doesn't want your money. The government uses the money it collects to do good, and always end up in the hole anyway. (because of the chintzy super-rich never want to pay enough taxes!) Corporations and the super-rich take your money and keep it for themselves. They take the government's money. They can't get enough. If you've got it, they want it. And they are very diabolical about getting what they want.

    We need a socialist health care system. It is wrong for people to think of healing as a way to get rich. It is wrong for corporations to be making billions of dollars on the 'business' of providing health care. Health care in the USA should be a RIGHT. We can put a man on the moon; we can do this.

    The capitalist model cannot work well for that because there is no way to have basic competition. Something happens and you're rushed off to the hospital, you don't spring up out of the gurney and say: "WAIT! I want to shop around and see which is the best deal in hospitals!" It's not like you're laying on the ground and waving off the first few EMT's because they charge too much. That's ridiculous. Who calls around to doctor offices for prices? "How much do you charge for treatment if I have a stroke?" No. That's ridiculous. Capitalism doesn't work for that.

    We need Socialism in the USA.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  2. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    Bourbon (08-30-2018), Cypress (08-30-2018), Frank Apisa (08-30-2018), iolo (09-01-2018), NiftyNiblick (09-03-2018), Phantasmal (08-30-2018), reagansghost (08-30-2018), ThatOwlWoman (08-31-2018), TrippyHippy (08-31-2018)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,790
    Thanks
    35,478
    Thanked 50,293 Times in 27,099 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    From what I can tell, there are still elderly teabaggers who think if they holler "Socialism!", it carries some radioactive, disparaging, even frightening red scare imagery and undertones with it. They got political mileage out of it for many decades. As late as the 1990s, they were calling the uber-centrist Bill Clinton a "socialist" whenever their base needed red meat tossed to them.

    You can actually tell who on this board is is over the age of 60 based on their use of archaic and outdated cold war lexicon like "Bolshevik", "commie", "statist", "socialist", "Marxist-Leninist".

    These days, I do not think anyone under the age of 50 retains any residual Cold War revulsion to the word "socialism". In fact, I believe there is polling that suggests millennials find the word "capitalism" more repulsive than socialism.
    Near as I can tell, only teabagging octogenarian old farts are still living with the Red Scare in their own minds!
    Last edited by Cypress; 08-30-2018 at 09:33 AM.

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Phantasmal (08-30-2018), PoliTalker (08-30-2018), reagansghost (08-30-2018), ThatOwlWoman (08-31-2018), TrippyHippy (08-31-2018)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,253
    Thanks
    13,544
    Thanked 12,185 Times in 7,629 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,051 Times in 998 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    From what I can tell, there are still elderly teabaggers who think if they holler "Socialism!", it carries some radioactive, disparaging, even frightening red scare imagery and undertones with it. They got political mileage out of it for many decades. As late as the 1990s, they were calling the uber-centrist Bill Clinton a "socialist" whenever their base needed red meat tossed to them.

    You can actually tell who on this board is is over the age of 60 based on their use of archaic and outdated cold war lexicon like "Bolshevik", "commie", "statist", "socialist", "Marxist-Leninist".

    These days, I do not think anyone under the age of 50 retains any residual Cold War revulsion to the word "socialism". In fact, I believe there is polling that suggests millennials find the word "capitalism" more repulsive than socialism.
    Near as I can tell, only teabagging octogenarian old farts are still living with the Red Scare in their own minds!
    I was going to "thank" that post...until the last line.

    I'm 82...and fuck the "red scare."

    Capitalism of the type we have...SCARES ME MORE.

    Donald, the abomination, Trump...SCARES ME MORE.

    Healthcare should indeed be taken out of the Capitalistic realm...and moved to a right.

    Sufficient food for each individual should be move there next.

    An education for every person who wants it...should also.

    And, of course, there are others.

    The basic needs of a decent life should be met for everyone...then the greedy can fight to get as much of the plenty that will be left.

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Frank Apisa For This Post:

    Cypress (08-30-2018), Phantasmal (08-30-2018), PoliTalker (08-30-2018), ThatOwlWoman (08-31-2018)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,790
    Thanks
    35,478
    Thanked 50,293 Times in 27,099 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    I was going to "thank" that post...until the last line.

    I'm 82...and fuck the "red scare."

    Capitalism of the type we have...SCARES ME MORE.

    Donald, the abomination, Trump...SCARES ME MORE.

    Healthcare should indeed be taken out of the Capitalistic realm...and moved to a right.

    Sufficient food for each individual should be move there next.

    An education for every person who wants it...should also.

    And, of course, there are others.

    The basic needs of a decent life should be met for everyone...then the greedy can fight to get as much of the plenty that will be left.
    Good points...all!

    I did make it a point to make the statement about "teabagging" old farts.

    One can be 82, while being neither a teabagger nor an old fart.
    Quite a few of our older citizens are liberal minded, young at heart, and enlightened. Surprisingly, almost none of them vote Republican or support Trump.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (08-30-2018), Phantasmal (08-30-2018), ThatOwlWoman (08-31-2018)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Predatory redistributive capitalism relies upon the masses being divided and working against each other in support of their own subjugation. If they stop competing against each other and begin cooperating amongst themselves while shunning the competition mindfuck, the feudal lords' house of cards would crumble via attrition caused by mass noncooperation and nonparticipation.

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Fentoine Lum For This Post:

    iolo (08-31-2018), Phantasmal (08-30-2018), PoliTalker (08-30-2018), ThatOwlWoman (08-31-2018), TrippyHippy (08-31-2018)

  11. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    I was going to "thank" that post...until the last line.

    I'm 82...and fuck the "red scare."

    Capitalism of the type we have...SCARES ME MORE.

    Donald, the abomination, Trump...SCARES ME MORE.

    Healthcare should indeed be taken out of the Capitalistic realm...and moved to a right.

    Sufficient food for each individual should be move there next.

    An education for every person who wants it...should also.

    And, of course, there are others.

    The basic needs of a decent life should be met for everyone...then the greedy can fight to get as much of the plenty that will be left.
    its unfettered capitalism that eats its self



    the wealthy love it


    so they make up lies to get idiots to vote against their own benefit

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (08-30-2018), ThatOwlWoman (08-31-2018)

  13. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    its unfettered capitalism that eats its self



    the wealthy love it


    so they make up lies to get idiots to vote against their own benefit
    Capitalism lurches from one crisis to the next, goes all the way back to the 1400's. And everytime it does nowadays, more societal wealth is redistributed to the aristocracy.

    "You know the statistics. Income inequality in the United States has not been this pronounced in over a century. The top 10 percent has 50 percent of the country’s income, and the upper 1 percent has 20 percent of the country’s income. A quarter of American workers struggle on wages of less than $10 an hour, putting them below the poverty line, while the income of the average CEO of a major corporation is more than 300 times the pay of his or her average worker, a massive increase given that in the 1950s the average CEO made 20 times what his or her worker made. This income inequality is global. The richest 1 percent of the world’s population controls 40 percent of the world’s wealth. And it is getting worse.

    What will the consequences of this inequality be economically and politically? How much worse will it get with the imposition of austerity programs and a new tax code that slashes rates for corporations, allowing companies to hoard money or buy back their own stock rather than invest in the economy? How will we endure as health care insurance premiums steadily rise and social and public welfare programs such as Medicaid, Pell Grants and food stamps are cut? And under the tax code revision signed by President Trump in December, rates will increase over the long term for the working class. Over the next decade, the revision will cost the nation roughly $1.5 trillion. Where will this end?

    We live in a new feudalism. We have been stripped of political power. Workers are trapped in menial jobs, forced into crippling debt and paid stagnant or declining wages. Chronic poverty and exploitative working conditions in many parts of the world, and increasingly in the United States, replicate the hell endured by industrial workers at the end of the 19th century. The complete capture of ruling institutions by corporations and their oligarchic elites, including the two dominant political parties, the courts and the press, means there is no mechanism left by which we can reform the system or protect ourselves from mounting abuse. We will revolt or become 21st-century serfs, forced to live in misery and brutally oppressed by militarized police and the most sophisticated security and surveillance system in human history while the ruling oligarchs continue to wallow in unimagined wealth and opulence.
    "

    Becoming Serfs
    https://www.truthdig.com/articles/becoming-serfs/

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fentoine Lum For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (08-30-2018), PoliTalker (08-30-2018)

  15. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (08-31-2018)

  17. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,527
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,570 Times in 17,095 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Capitalism, if not regulated, will end in terrible wealth gaps. That was predicted long ago and you can see how accurate that is. Our wealth gap is worse than the Gilded Age. The wealthy are owning Republican party and buying much of the Dems. Our right wing geniuses voted a "billionaire" into offiice believing he would fix that. How stupid is that? So more money trickling up, up and away.

    The founders chartered corporations. If the corporation did acts that were against the public welfare, their charters could be revoked. They were absolutely not corporate lovers. The American Revolution was partly spurred on by the abuse of English law and corporations. The colonials were not allowed to have clothing manufacturers as an example. English taoilrs got laws passed to prohibit it.
    Last edited by Nordberg; 08-30-2018 at 11:45 AM.

  18. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,623
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 779 Times in 572 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 41 Times in 41 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    There is a long standing Conservative Myth that we have to choose between socialism and capitalism. Some say socialism is like a cancerous disease that, once begun, grows and grows until it chokes capitalism to death and destroys the economy.

    False and false.

    Socialism is working very well in most industrialized nations. The USA is the only highly industrialized nation which does not have a socialist universal health care system.

    We have had socialism in the USA for a long time now.

    Even back when most Trump supporters would say 'America was great.' (the 1950's?)

    We had social security and a minimum wage. Neither of those things is the result of capitalism.

    The (socialism again) GI Bill saved millions of returning American vets from poverty. It allowed them to get an education, get a job, get a mortgage, get a home, and build wealth. (White Americans, anyway - blacks were redlined OUT of home ownership, the primary vehicle to wealth for most Americans.)

    FDR: One of the greatest Presidents ever. He brought us through the big war, brought us socialism to save us from the ravages of Great Depression.

    Socialism has lots of promises and benefits but socialism cannot be our only solution.

    Capitalism is our primary wealth generator. Capitalism is a powerful engine of motivation and productivity.

    How do we decide between the two?

    That's a trick question.

    We don't have to pick one.

    We can have BOTH!

    We already do.

    The trick is to get the correct balance between the two. We just need the proper blend of capitalism and socialism. We can work jobs, pay into the system, and let the system take care of the needy. Everyone wins!

    We need to be talking more and more about how socialism can work for us. We need to move beyond the limiting old Conservative Myths that are supporting the Class War and wealth extraction.

    Corporations and the super-rich extract far more of our wealth than socialism. We need to face up to the facts here. The government doesn't want your money. The government uses the money it collects to do good, and always end up in the hole anyway. (because of the chintzy super-rich never want to pay enough taxes!) Corporations and the super-rich take your money and keep it for themselves. They take the government's money. They can't get enough. If you've got it, they want it. And they are very diabolical about getting what they want.

    We need a socialist health care system. It is wrong for people to think of healing as a way to get rich. It is wrong for corporations to be making billions of dollars on the 'business' of providing health care. Health care in the USA should be a RIGHT. We can put a man on the moon; we can do this.

    The capitalist model cannot work well for that because there is no way to have basic competition. Something happens and you're rushed off to the hospital, you don't spring up out of the gurney and say: "WAIT! I want to shop around and see which is the best deal in hospitals!" It's not like you're laying on the ground and waving off the first few EMT's because they charge too much. That's ridiculous. Who calls around to doctor offices for prices? "How much do you charge for treatment if I have a stroke?" No. That's ridiculous. Capitalism doesn't work for that.

    We need Socialism in the USA.
    That's not true. Socialism does not work, or otherwise leads to tyranny. Healthcare is not socialism, despite what conservatives and socialists say. Universal healthcare is the product of wealthy, free-market, liberal democracies.

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    We need a mixed economy, works best in all nations, the difficulties become determining which degree of capitalism and socialism blend the best

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Cypress (08-31-2018), Nordberg (08-30-2018)

  21. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Fentoine Lum,

    Quote Originally Posted by Fentoine Lum View Post
    Capitalism lurches from one crisis to the next, goes all the way back to the 1400's. And everytime it does nowadays, more societal wealth is redistributed to the aristocracy.

    "You know the statistics. Income inequality in the United States has not been this pronounced in over a century. The top 10 percent has 50 percent of the country’s income, and the upper 1 percent has 20 percent of the country’s income. A quarter of American workers struggle on wages of less than $10 an hour, putting them below the poverty line, while the income of the average CEO of a major corporation is more than 300 times the pay of his or her average worker, a massive increase given that in the 1950s the average CEO made 20 times what his or her worker made. This income inequality is global. The richest 1 percent of the world’s population controls 40 percent of the world’s wealth. And it is getting worse.

    What will the consequences of this inequality be economically and politically? How much worse will it get with the imposition of austerity programs and a new tax code that slashes rates for corporations, allowing companies to hoard money or buy back their own stock rather than invest in the economy? How will we endure as health care insurance premiums steadily rise and social and public welfare programs such as Medicaid, Pell Grants and food stamps are cut? And under the tax code revision signed by President Trump in December, rates will increase over the long term for the working class. Over the next decade, the revision will cost the nation roughly $1.5 trillion. Where will this end?

    We live in a new feudalism. We have been stripped of political power. Workers are trapped in menial jobs, forced into crippling debt and paid stagnant or declining wages. Chronic poverty and exploitative working conditions in many parts of the world, and increasingly in the United States, replicate the hell endured by industrial workers at the end of the 19th century. The complete capture of ruling institutions by corporations and their oligarchic elites, including the two dominant political parties, the courts and the press, means there is no mechanism left by which we can reform the system or protect ourselves from mounting abuse. We will revolt or become 21st-century serfs, forced to live in misery and brutally oppressed by militarized police and the most sophisticated security and surveillance system in human history while the ruling oligarchs continue to wallow in unimagined wealth and opulence.
    "

    Becoming Serfs
    https://www.truthdig.com/articles/becoming-serfs/
    What a great article. And so true.

    The real battle is the rich and powerful oligarchs against everybody else. But since they have us divided and conquered, they win the Class War. And they keep on winning. It's the war that never ends unless the people revolt. Wolff is right. It's just like it was before the French revolution. Capitalism is a double-edged sword. It is very powerful, but it can hurt you unless it is used very carefully. Capitalism will self-destruct without proper government regulation. It already happened in the Great Depression. And again in the Great Recession. And every time that happens more people get hurt. If we just had capitalism properly regulated by a strong government, and mixed with the proper amount of socialism, we could have a healthy and mutually prosperous economy for everyone.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  22. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    1,536
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 457 Times in 329 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 63 Times in 55 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    its unfettered capitalism that eats its self



    the wealthy love it


    so they make up lies to get idiots to vote against their own benefit
    -in bold-
    I really struggle with that phrase. My wife says it all the time. I... know where it comes from.
    I don't like the phrase. It's monopoly capitalism, not unfettered, that's just avoidance. Get old school and call it what it is.,monopoly. It may be known to you as a hasboro game but in reality it was and is a descriptor for an economic realty.

  23. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello and welcome to the discussion crowonapost,

    Quote Originally Posted by crowonapost View Post
    -in bold-
    I really struggle with that phrase. [ unfettered capitalism ] My wife says it all the time. I... know where it comes from.
    I don't like the phrase. It's monopoly capitalism, not unfettered, that's just avoidance. Get old school and call it what it is.,monopoly. It may be known to you as a hasboro game but in reality it was and is a descriptor for an economic realty.
    That is the ideal all capitalists strive for. They want complete control over one or more markets for whatever product they sell. That's the holy grail. Like the big pharma greed where they get complete control over a single needed product and then raise the price 900%. Hey. If you don't like it, you don't have to pay. You do have another option. You can pay or you can die. They love it. That's their goal. To have you in such a position. Capitalism at it's most lucrative is death.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  24. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    88,318
    Thanks
    145,744
    Thanked 82,545 Times in 52,757 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,657 Times in 4,376 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crowonapost View Post
    -in bold-
    I really struggle with that phrase. My wife says it all the time. I... know where it comes from.
    I don't like the phrase. It's monopoly capitalism, not unfettered, that's just avoidance. Get old school and call it what it is.,monopoly. It may be known to you as a hasboro game but in reality it was and is a descriptor for an economic realty.
    "Monopoly" is a good word too. We don't seem to care much about mega-mergers and monopolies any more.

    That being said, by "unfettered" we mean that capitalism has no rules to follow. No minimum wage. No restrictions on environmental damage caused in the course of doing business. No worker safety regulations. No unfair hiring practices laws. In other words, those who wish capitalism in the U.S. to remain unfettered want us to be like developing nations with none of these regulations that protect life, property, and the human beings employed in industry. That's why Dumpty is doing everything he can via EO to cut the fetters and go back to the bad old days where dumping coal ash into a river was how it was done, belching toxins into the air was no BFD, etc.

  25. The Following User Groans At ThatOwlWoman For This Awful Post:

    Boris The Animal (09-03-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. Ohio Car Dealers: "Competition BAD...Socialism GOOD!"
    By ZappasGuitar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 02-13-2014, 06:40 PM
  2. On second thought mate socialism is a pretty good deal
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-04-2012, 12:23 PM
  3. If this is Socialism....
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-18-2012, 07:26 AM
  4. Got Socialism?!!
    By signalmankenneth in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 03:01 PM
  5. Why Socialism?
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 10-01-2010, 02:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •