"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
— Joe Biden on Obama.
Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.
D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.
Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
— Joe Biden on Obama.
Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.
D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.
Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".
This is the close as the dems will get to acknowledging welfare fraud. Since the working poor are the recipients, they are back-handedly acknowledging that welfare fraud exists.
Why would it have to be in the Constitution? Do you have even a slight little clue as to what States rights are? That was why virtually every State, led by Jefferson, and Madison, in Virginia had laws passed to prevent income inequality. That was also why virtually every State has laws restricting corporations, and especially their involvement in politics.
You might take your head out of your ass long enough to let your brain, what little you have, get some air.
“An equality of property, with a necessity of alienation, constantly operating to destroy combinations of powerful families, is the very soul of a republic--While this continues, the people will inevitably possess both power and freedom; when this is lost, power departs, liberty expires, and a commonwealth will inevitably assume some other form." Noah Webster
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
LV426 (08-21-2018)
You really are a stupid fuck
If it's not codified in the Constitution, ... then it's just opining.
The FF's did Not put income equality or abolishment of inheritance in the Constitution. If it was a necessity as you so adamantly claim, ... they would have all agreed to put it in there.
The reality (not your forte) is that income inequality has grown since the Constitution was written and signed by the FF's. Don't doubt me.
On the other hand, your socialist workers party hero, Lenin, did abolish the right to inheritance in 1918.
"Abolition of Inheritance
Decree Abolishing Inheritance. April 27, 1918
I. Inheritance, whether by law or by will, is abolished.
After the death of an owner, the property which belonged to him, whether movable or immovable, becomes the property of the Government of the Russian Socialistic Soviet Federative Republic."
Move to North Korea and enjoy your socialist income equality there, dumbfuck.
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
— Joe Biden on Obama.
Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.
D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.
Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".
OK
Let me see if I understand the assertion being made here:
a) The Walton's? The richest family in the world? The richest merchants perhaps.
b) So the allegation is:
- Hillary Rodam, a virtual nobody, worked diligently her entire life, not merely through school including college *, but also as
- a lawyer for the under-privileged
- first lady of Arkansas
- first lady of the United States
- junior U.S. senator from New York
- secretary of State
- Democrat nominee for U.S. president, &
- the popular choice by the whole People for the U.S. presidency
served on the board @Wal~Mart for 6 years, yet remains a champion of the People?
You criticize her? What does your résumé look like?
* Was Hillary a Rhodes scholar? I believe her husband was. And didn't they meet in college?
"It should be obvious to anyone why conservatives and libertarians should be against Trump. He has no grounding in belief. No core philosophy. No morals. No loyalty. No curiosity. No empathy and no understanding. He demands personal loyalty and not loyalty to the nation. His only core belief is in his own superiority to everyone else. His only want is exercise more and more personal power." smb / purveyor of fact 18/03/18
"As a shareholder and director of our company, I’m always proud of Wal-Mart.” These are the words of Hillary Clinton at the company’s 1990 stockholder meeting. You might not recognize this version of Clinton because the more recent version has attempted to match Bernie Sanders in his disdain for ‘big business.’ Clinton’s record at Wal-Mart should make you question both the authenticity of her populism.
Wal-Mart took pains to make sure its workers didn't unionize. During Clinton’s tenure on the board, the company’s strategy for dealing with organized labor was directed by fellow board member, John Tate. Mr. Tate famously summed up his philosophy at a 2004 managers meeting: "Labor unions are nothing but blood-sucking parasites living off the productive labor of people who work for a living.”
According to former board members, Clinton did not denounce the ‘anti-union’ efforts Tate spearheaded, nor rail for increased employee wages. Donald G. Soderquist, the board’s vice chairman, said that not only was Clinton “not a dissenter,” but that “she was a part of those decisions.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/02/22/hillary-clinton-wal-mart-minimum-wage-layoffs-store-closures-column/80225734/
Drink much?"Most welfare benefits are income determinant, meaning you cannot get welfare unless you are employed." L4
"It should be obvious to anyone why conservatives and libertarians should be against Trump. He has no grounding in belief. No core philosophy. No morals. No loyalty. No curiosity. No empathy and no understanding. He demands personal loyalty and not loyalty to the nation. His only core belief is in his own superiority to everyone else. His only want is exercise more and more personal power." smb / purveyor of fact 18/03/18
Your usual ignorance is noted. Is your right to drive mentioned in the Constitution? But, just as your asinine attitude shows, many things that we take for granted are not mentioned in the Constitution. The Heller decision, which asses like you tout as the "right to own guns", declares that States have the right to place restrictions on gun ownership. Is that mentioned in the Constitution? But you, being the ignorant ass you are, have to refer to Lenin to make your point, as if you had one.
But No. Korea is a good example of your peculiar attitude. Millions are starving to death while their elitists groups are getting rich, and living quite well. Same bull shit attitude as yours.
BTW, are you saying Jefferson, Madison, Paine, Franklin, Webster, etc., are the same as Lenin?
Go suck your mentors dick some more asshole.
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Bookmarks