No, Strzok hasn’t been cleared yet

[Darth Omar]

The statement is the first time Horowitz has specified he is reviewing the origin of the much-scrutinized probe into Russia’s attempts to cooperate with the Trump campaign as part of its effort to meddle in the 2016 election.

And it comes on the heels of a weighty DOJ IG report that detailed the animosity expressed for then-candidate Donald Trump by Peter Strzok, one of the senior agents that helped launch the Russia probe.

Given Strzok’s strong opinions, Horowitz said, he couldn't conclude with confidence that Strzok's personal views didn't bleed into his investigative decisions. Strzok was also a member of the team probing Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state — the main focus of the recent watchdog report.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pol...respond-653544
_______________

I noticed some of the JPP media Lemmings are under the delusion that Strzok has been cleared of allowing his animus towards Trump of affecting the Trump Russia investigation.

The alleged ‘clearance’ amounts to IG Horowitz statement that he ‘couldn’t conclude with confidence’ that Strzok’s bias didn’t affect his work. In other words, even though there was no smoking gun—there was plenty of room for suspicion that Strzok’s bias DID affect his work.

Suffice to say, there’s a reason Strzok started a GoFundMe—he knows this isn’t over yet. He may be looking at charges that will make look Manafort look lucky.

[anatta]

Given Strzok’s strong opinions, Horowitz said, he couldn't conclude with confidence that Strzok's personal views didn't bleed into his investigative decisions

IG cannot accuse or impugn motives. That is up to a prosecutor -hence the carefully crafted language..

It's all stating to come apart at the seams - the piles of lies and obfuscations fed by a fanatical Deep State cabal.
We told you so a year ago

[Darth Omar]

IG cannot accuse or impugn motives. That is up to a prosecutor -hence the carefully crafted language..

It's all stating to come apart at the seams - the piles of lies and obfuscations fed by a fanatical Deep State cabal.
We told you so a year ago

Huber has been quiet. I wonder how some October indictments would affect things lol.

[anatta]

Huber has been quiet. I wonder how some October indictments would affect things lol.

you have more confidence in that alliance then I do.
I think Huber is just there as a show horse to compel testimony ( threatening a grand jury)

The whole thing screams for a SP - instead of the Mueller SC silly "Russian collusion" crappola

[Darth Omar]

you have more confidence in that alliance then I do.
I think Huber is just there as a show horse to compel testimony ( threatening a grand jury)

The whole thing screams for a SP - instead of the Mueller SC silly "Russian collusion" crappola

My confidence is waning.

That’s what’s aggravating—another SP isn’t needed, so long as Huber/Horowitz really are working together. A federal indictment is a federal indictment and Huber’s are as good as Mullet’s.

That said, just because we haven’t heard anything isn’t conclusive of anything. You’re not supposed to hear about investigations.

That’s easy to forget these days.

[Nordberg]

Strzok is guilty of seeing trump is unqualified to be president and saying so on Twitter. He performed his job fairly and honestly. He investigated Hillary as his job demanded.

[Darth Omar]

Strzok is guilty of seeing trump is unqualified to be president and saying so on Twitter. He performed his job fairly and honestly. He investigated Hillary as his job demanded.

Strzok is on record promising to ‘stop Trump’—amongst some other troublesome statements.

Some of us think that’s a problem. It warrants more than a congressional hearing.

[anatta]

My confidence is waning.

That’s what’s aggravating—another SP isn’t needed, so long as Huber/Horowitz really are working together. A federal indictment is a federal indictment and Huber’s are as good as Mullet’s.

That said, just because we haven’t heard anything isn’t conclusive of anything. You’re not supposed to hear about investigations.

That’s easy to forget these days.

I just don't see how Horowitz can call past employees - which are the deep state creeps -
unless Huber is issuing a lot of subpoenas we are not hearing about

[Darth Omar]

I just don't see how Horowitz can call past employees - which are the deep state creeps -
unless Huber is issuing a lot of subpoenas we are not hearing about

Huber can call anyone.

Horowitz is limited to employees in the system. I don’t know what would prevent him from passing the records of ex-agents on to Huber.

But I may be missing something.

[dukkha]

Huber can call anyone.

Horowitz is limited to employees in the system. I don’t know what would prevent him from passing the records of ex-agents on to Huber.

But I may be missing something.

I don't know if Huber is "active" in a IG run report..we've never seen this combination to my knowledge.
So is he calling anyone? if so -where are the subpoenas? pres coverage? ( Ok the press covers nothing)

[Darth Omar]

I don't know if Huber is "active" in a IG run report..we've never seen this combination to my knowledge.
So is he calling anyone? if so -where are the subpoenas? pres coverage? ( Ok the press covers nothing)

I don’t know lol.

But I’ll make excuses for him and say he’s still gathering information from Horowitz. It’s plausible, since Horowitz hasn’t finished yet.

[Nordberg]

The statement is the first time Horowitz has specified he is reviewing the origin of the much-scrutinized probe into Russia’s attempts to cooperate with the Trump campaign as part of its effort to meddle in the 2016 election.

And it comes on the heels of a weighty DOJ IG report that detailed the animosity expressed for then-candidate Donald Trump by Peter Strzok, one of the senior agents that helped launch the Russia probe.

Given Strzok’s strong opinions, Horowitz said, he couldn't conclude with confidence that Strzok's personal views didn't bleed into his investigative decisions. Strzok was also a member of the team probing Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state — the main focus of the recent watchdog report.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pol...respond-653544
_______________

I noticed some of the JPP media Lemmings are under the delusion that Strzok has been cleared of allowing his animus towards Trump of affecting the Trump Russia investigation.

The alleged ‘clearance’ amounts to IG Horowitz statement that he ‘couldn’t conclude with confidence’ that Strzok’s bias didn’t affect his work. In other words, even though there was no smoking gun—there was plenty of room for suspicion that Strzok’s bias DID affect his work.

Suffice to say, there’s a reason Strzok started a GoFundMe—he knows this isn’t over yet. He may be looking at charges that will make look Manafort look lucky.

Strzok was the guy who told Comey to make the speech that killed Hillary's shot. He was doing his job even though he could see trump is a joke. When Mueller heard aboit the texts, he took him off his team. There is nothing to see here.

[dukkha]

I don’t know lol.

But I’ll make excuses for him and say he’s still gathering information from Horowitz. It’s plausible, since Horowitz hasn’t finished yet.

agree.. we don't know. But this is the one shot we got to stop this from ever happening again,
Once again the Worthless Sessions plays a weak hand

[Rune]

Strzok is on record promising to ‘stop Trump’—amongst some other troublesome statements.

Some of us think that’s a problem. It warrants more than a congressional hearing.

A hearing you clearly didn't see.

[Rune]

agree.. we don't know. But this is the one shot we got to stop this from ever happening again,
Once again the Worthless Sessions plays a weak hand

you will never stop anything you impotent fool.