Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 60 of 60

Thread: Is a national security clearance really a 1st Amendment issue?

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Great State of Texas
    Posts
    1,215
    Thanks
    244
    Thanked 591 Times in 414 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 43 Times in 40 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    So the spin from the left (heard it on PMSNBC this morning) is that John Brennan having his national security clearance revoked is a violation of his first amendment right to free speech.

    Can someone explain that? Using that logic, we should all have national security clearances. How is John Brennan's ability to speak being limited right now?

    Anyone?

    Thread bans revoked because I want to hear leftardiot spin
    The sheeple on the Left cannot explain it.

    They are just parroting the fake news MSM talking points.

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,553
    Thanks
    12,216
    Thanked 14,340 Times in 10,527 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Crow View Post
    The sheeple on the Left cannot explain it.

    They are just parroting the fake news MSM talking points.
    ^Holy shit, another ignorant fucking Trumpsucker.

    Fake news!
    Cabal!
    Uranium One!
    MAGA!
    Witch hunt!
    No collusion!
    Deep State!
    Coup!

    It’s about abuse of power and obstruction of justice, halfwit.

    Keep floundering.

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Great State of Texas
    Posts
    1,215
    Thanks
    244
    Thanked 591 Times in 414 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 43 Times in 40 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    ^Holy shit, another ignorant fucking Trumpsucker.

    Fake news!
    Cabal!
    Uranium One!
    MAGA!
    Witch hunt!
    No collusion!
    Deep State!
    Coup!

    It’s about abuse of power and obstruction of justice, halfwit.

    Keep floundering.
    You guys are so hilarious.

    It reminds me when you were ALL so convinced right up 'til about 9:30pm on election night that Queen Cankles was going to win in a landslide.

    Then the meltdown started.

    The same will happen again when your Deep State Warriors start getting indicted.

    Better put the popcorn on ....

    This meltdown is gonna be even better.

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,553
    Thanks
    12,216
    Thanked 14,340 Times in 10,527 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Crow View Post
    You guys are so hilarious.

    It reminds me when you were ALL so convinced right up 'til about 9:30pm on election night that Queen Cankles was going to win in a landslide.

    Then the meltdown started.

    The same will happen again when your Deep State Warriors start getting indicted.

    Better put the popcorn on ....

    This meltdown is gonna be even better.
    I predicted nothing, shitstain.

    Notice who HAS been indicted, dumbfuck. Those associated with Orangetweet. Please, hold your breath on the “deep state” claim.

    Fake news!
    Cabal!
    Uranium One!
    MAGA!
    Witch hunt!
    No collusion!
    Deep State!
    Coup!

    So far, Trumpsucker, you’re parroting the RW lemmings perfectly.

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,288
    Thanks
    3,870
    Thanked 5,011 Times in 3,467 Posts
    Groans
    1,286
    Groaned 494 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    When you put it that way, it certainly silences the speech of those that could previously talk to him, doesn’t it?

    But it’s actually about abuse of power and obstruction of justice.
    It wouldn't stifle their right to speech, but it might cost them their job if they want to share secrets with Brennan. Nobody is having their speech restricted in any unusual manner. Standard government practice.

    If you can prove he's misusing his power then get him impeached for it. Stop making stupid arguments about free speech.

  6. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Great State of Texas
    Posts
    1,215
    Thanks
    244
    Thanked 591 Times in 414 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 43 Times in 40 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    I predicted nothing, shitstain.

    Notice who HAS been indicted, dumbfuck. Those associated with Orangetweet. Please, hold your breath on the “deep state” claim.

    Fake news!
    Cabal!
    Uranium One!
    MAGA!
    Witch hunt!
    No collusion!
    Deep State!
    Coup!

    So far, Trumpsucker, you’re parroting the RW lemmings perfectly.
    Get back to me when someone actually gets indicted for Collusion or anything else to do with the President.

  7. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Great State of Texas
    Posts
    1,215
    Thanks
    244
    Thanked 591 Times in 414 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 43 Times in 40 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tinfoil View Post
    It wouldn't stifle their right to speech, but it might cost them their job if they want to share secrets with Brennan. Nobody is having their speech restricted in any unusual manner. Standard government practice.

    If you can prove he's misusing his power then get him impeached for it. Stop making stupid arguments about free speech.
    LOL ....

    Stupid is as ....

    These folks don't understand enough about what's going on to make a coherent argument about anything.

    They are blinded by their hate.

    All they got is parroted fake news MSM faux talking points.

  8. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,553
    Thanks
    12,216
    Thanked 14,340 Times in 10,527 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tinfoil View Post
    It wouldn't stifle their right to speech, but it might cost them their job if they want to share secrets with Brennan. Nobody is having their speech restricted in any unusual manner. Standard government practice.

    If you can prove he's misusing his power then get him impeached for it. Stop making stupid arguments about free speech.
    I never indicated it was a free speech issue for Brennan, moron. I merely pointed out, from your post, that it does limit the speech for those it previously wasn’t an issue.

    Abuse of power and obstruction issue, however.

  9. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,553
    Thanks
    12,216
    Thanked 14,340 Times in 10,527 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Crow View Post
    Get back to me when someone actually gets indicted for Collusion or anything else to do with the President.
    Hold your breath on your prediction, please.

    Laughable loser. Right out of the chute, too.

  10. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,553
    Thanks
    12,216
    Thanked 14,340 Times in 10,527 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Crow View Post
    LOL ....

    Stupid is as ....

    These folks don't understand enough about what's going on to make a coherent argument about anything.

    They are blinded by their hate.

    All they got is parroted fake news MSM faux talking points.
    Fake news!
    Cabal!
    Uranium One!
    MAGA!
    Witch hunt!
    No collusion!
    Deep State!
    Coup!

    Waiting for the trifecta, dumbfuck. Go for it. Increase your vocabulary to three words.

  11. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Great State of Texas
    Posts
    1,215
    Thanks
    244
    Thanked 591 Times in 414 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 43 Times in 40 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Hold your breath on your prediction, please.

    Laughable loser. Right out of the chute, too.
    There's no evidence of collusion.

    There's no evidence of any crime related to the President or his campaign.

    All arrest have been processed crimes and none related to collusion or the President.

    Yet in your Alt Left Universe somehow, we are losing.

    OK ....

    Get back with after the evening meds are passed.

  12. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,553
    Thanks
    12,216
    Thanked 14,340 Times in 10,527 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Crow View Post
    There's no evidence of collusion.

    There's no evidence of any crime related to the President or his campaign.

    All arrest have been processed crimes and none related to collusion or the President.

    Yet in your Alt Left Universe somehow, we are losing.

    OK ....

    Get back with after the evening meds are passed.
    As with the other RW Trumpsuckers, I see words are difficult for you.

    YOU made the prediction about the deep state indictments, dumbshit. PLEASE, hold your breath on that one.

    I merely pointed out the indictments of those that Trump surrounded himself with.

    Flounder, punk. You’re amusing already.

  13. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    You really don't get it? Trump has a Nixion type enemies list. He is taking clearance away from people who spoke against him. He is trying to stop their free speech. Talk against me and I will punish you. Not a very compelling argument. And done crappily again. Most of those people lost clearance when they left the FBI. The right cannot evaluate. If Trump says it, you buy it without question. You guys are showing such ignorance.
    Problem is I have seen Brennan speaking out against Trump. So your theory falls flat.

    National security clearance is not a predicate of free speech. It is a stupid premise and you should stop pushing it. Only stupid people do.

    Brennan is caught now with his own tweet

    He claims that there was collusion between Trump and Russia. That means

    1) He didn't put it in his assessment report. Why?
    2) He has been given new information that he is now leaking - Against the law

    Which is it? Did he lie on his initial assessment report or is he leaking classified information now.

    It is OK. I know you won't answer the question. You can't

  14. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lesh View Post
    Exactly. Trump is using this as a way to stifle the First Amendment rights of those he sees as enemies.

    If he'll do this...what other powers of the government will he use against private citizens to stifle them?
    I what way is he stifling First Amendment rights? Be specific and detailed.
    Every life matters

  15. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon/Cigar/guno
    EVERY CIA Director has consulted with the Previous Director's ... EVERY ONE OF THEM

    Now the current Director can't
    Good, we don't need commies consulting with anyone in our government.
    Every life matters

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 128
    Last Post: 08-16-2018, 02:08 PM
  2. Peter Strzok of Secret Society Fame Has Lost His Security Clearance
    By hvilleherb in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-21-2018, 07:49 PM
  3. Memo and national security
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 02-03-2018, 08:22 PM
  4. Replies: 59
    Last Post: 11-14-2017, 02:48 PM
  5. revoke Kushner’s security clearance
    By Buckly J. Ewer in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 195
    Last Post: 06-01-2017, 12:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •