Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: We are in hot water, thanks Trump!

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default We are in hot water, thanks Trump!

    A new study, published today in the journal Nature, finds that marine heat wave days have doubled between 1982 and 2016, which cannot be explained by natural variability alone. What's new and significant, though, is what the study projects for the future.


    Show less
    Why it matters: Marine species that already live close to the upper end of their heat tolerance could perish in prolonged and more severe marine heatwaves in the near future — much as portions of the Great Barrier Reef did during the 2014 to 2017 global coral bleaching event.

    Recent studies have shown that the frequency of marine heat waves has increased in the past several decades, but a lot has remained unknown about these events, until now.
    How they did it: The new study uses satellite observations of ocean temperatures during the period from 1982 to 2016, combined with a suite of Earth system computer models to provide more insight into the likelihood and severity of such phenomena. The researchers identified an event as a marine heat wave when the sea surface temperature exceeded its local 99th percentile.

    What they found: The study's findings are grim, as they indicate that global warming is already sharply raising the risk of marine heat waves, and this is likely to get significantly worse.

    According to Thomas Frölicher, lead author of the study and a researcher at the University of Bern in Switzerland, if greenhouse gas emissions continue on their present course and temperatures were to rise by 6.3°F (3.5°C) by 2100, "the number of marine heatwave days will be 41 times higher than in preindustrial times," he told Axios.


    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0383-9


    Nature is a prestigious high impact scientific scholarly journal with the highest rep there is, maybe after Cell or Science.

    Poor Tom.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    evince (08-16-2018), Guno צְבִי (08-15-2018), ThatOwlWoman (08-15-2018)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Inshore waters are warming up. In my neck of the woods that is evidenced by the lobsters going farther offshore to colder waters, the increase of blue crabs up here from years ago, the decrease in certain needed sea grasses etc. This is something I can attest to. There are some benefits to it though. Oysters are increasing naturally, and a few others. Just my view.

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8,490
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 2,409 Posts
    Groans
    376
    Groaned 244 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    It can be explained, however, by the fact that most of the earlier data is modeled off very limited actual readings

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Inshore waters are warming up. In my neck of the woods that is evidenced by the lobsters going farther offshore to colder waters, the increase of blue crabs up here from years ago, the decrease in certain needed sea grasses etc. This is something I can attest to. There are some benefits to it though. Oysters are increasing naturally, and a few others. Just my view.
    Sea water temps in the 70s off Nauset Cap.
    Seem to remember the 50s were normal when I was a youngster.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Rune For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (08-15-2018)

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    It can be explained, however, by the fact that most of the earlier data is modeled off very limited actual readings
    No that doesn't explain it, or it would not have been published in peer review scholarship in the flagship science journal, it would have instead
    been in some blog frequented by...poor Tom.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (08-15-2018)

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8,490
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 2,409 Posts
    Groans
    376
    Groaned 244 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    No that doesn't explain it, or it would not have been published in peer review scholarship in the flagship science journal, it would have instead
    been in some blog frequented by...poor Tom.
    LOL peer reviewed journals.

    Strange because when I read an article about measurements of ocean temperatures being taken by a British Antarctica expedition, their conclusion was precisely along the lines of what I just stated. The ability to take these things is only recent, particularly at depth, and said team also indicated they weren't sure if the warming they noted was due to global warming or the fact that the winds had been pushing warm water in their direction for a sustained period.

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    89,080
    Thanks
    147,008
    Thanked 83,429 Times in 53,293 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Inshore waters are warming up. In my neck of the woods that is evidenced by the lobsters going farther offshore to colder waters, the increase of blue crabs up here from years ago, the decrease in certain needed sea grasses etc. This is something I can attest to. There are some benefits to it though. Oysters are increasing naturally, and a few others. Just my view.
    Overall though don't you think that the disruption and death of species will move on up the marine food chain -- eventually to us?

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    Sea water temps in the 70s off Nauset Cap.
    Seem to remember the 50s were normal when I was a youngster.
    They were definitely much cooler Cap. Good memory!

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,773 Times in 27,247 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  14. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (08-16-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. Raw water
    By Русский агент in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 01-05-2018, 05:16 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-15-2017, 07:00 PM
  3. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-15-2017, 06:45 PM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-11-2016, 11:12 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-07-2013, 11:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •