Members banned from this thread: evince


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 45

Thread: Pedophiles in the news

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    NC originally from NYC
    Posts
    34,861
    Thanks
    139,677
    Thanked 23,545 Times in 14,029 Posts
    Groans
    58
    Groaned 1,451 Times in 1,370 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Who told you that, faux Negress?
    Poor stan

    go with the flo
    “If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.”

    — Golda Meir

    Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.







    ברוך השם

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    Your link says the document highlights abuse that goes back seven decades. In that time, there's been about an equal number of Republican and Democratic administrations.
    Is that so, sock? How is it relevant?

    BTW, the absence of any concern for the children on your part is noted for the record.

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    33,934
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,544 Times in 9,995 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,099 Times in 1,011 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TTQ64 View Post
    All the Pedophiles were white males........You left that part out fucker.
    Most were gay men!

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Most were gay men!
    The Faux Negress left that part out. Also, there are quite a few Black priests in Pennsylvania. She has no idea whether or not any of them were guilty.

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default They escaped a pedophile

    Four young girls fought off a man who was attempting to kidnap them outside a convenience store in Michigan - hitting, kicking and then throwing coffee on him, police said.

    Authorities said the girls, who are in middle school, were attacked about 80 miles northeast of Lansing. A 22-year-old man, who was identified as Bruce Hipkins, "grabbed the youngest girl around the head and told her she was coming with him," then the others started defending her, according to a statement from the Millington Police Department.

    Authorities said that Hipkins "let the young girl go and grabbed another one of the girls by her hair." Again, police said, he was "kicked and hit by the girls until he let her go."

    The girls were not harmed in the incident. Hipkins was arrested on numerous charges, including kidnapping, police said.

    "I think they did great," Millington Police Chief Jason Oliver said about the girls Tuesday in an interview. "They did exactly what they should have done. They fought the suspect - and they won."



    https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Girls-used-kicks-and-coffee-to-escape-a-13155237.php

  6. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    This is you still refusing to express any empathy for the hundreds of children abused by pedophiles.

    BTW, I debunked your claim, and you didn't notice.
    And it gets funnier

    You don't give a shit about the kids, if you did you wouldn't have taken the time to paste pictures of the Clintons and Obama's with the Pope, you got caught, and now you are looking for a way out. Ain't any, your deficiencies are on full display

    As I said, stick with the banning posts, you do end up talking to yourself, but least you don't embarrass yourself

    Next

  7. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,543
    Thanks
    441
    Thanked 1,874 Times in 1,170 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 202 Times in 195 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Is that so...
    Yes. If you read your own post, you'll see it says "The 884-page document, two years in the making, shines a light into the dark corners of these dioceses going back seven decades, exposing the predators and the efforts of their bishops to protect them."

    How is it relevant?
    It's relevant because I was responding to the notion that it occurred just under previous Democratic administrations.

    BTW, the absence of any concern for the children on your part is noted for the record.
    There's no absence of concern for the children on my part. I am concerned about that. But I was struck by the odd decision to try to tie this in some way to the Clinton and Obama administrations, based simply on them meeting with popes as all presidents do.

    To be clear, what was the argument you were trying to make with those photos? Do you object to presidents meeting with popes? Do you think the Democratic presidents were closer to the Vatican than Republican presidents? Do you think there was something those particular presidents should have done differently with regard to the abuse? If so, what? And does it not apply to, say, the Bush administrations?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Oneuli For This Post:

    Phantasmal (08-14-2018)

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    16,140
    Thanks
    10,960
    Thanked 19,494 Times in 9,086 Posts
    Groans
    1,448
    Groaned 1,427 Times in 1,256 Posts

    Default


  10. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    33,934
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,544 Times in 9,995 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,099 Times in 1,011 Posts

    Default

    The hero of the gay rights movement was the founder of NAMBLA

    He got a full pass from the left his whole life

  11. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    It's relevant because I was responding to the notion that it occurred just under previous Democratic administrations.
    If I'd said it occurred just under DEMOCRAT Administrations, you'd have a point, sock.

    Since I didn't, you don't.

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    There's no absence of concern for the children on my part. I am concerned about that.
    So you say now, sock. Yet I had to shame you into saying so. Your first impulse was to spread the blame along partisan lines.

    That's telling. Very telling.

  12. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    The hero of the gay rights movement was the founder of NAMBLA He got a full pass from the left his whole life
    Didn't Hillary have a gay pal who was implicated in the death of a young Black man?

  13. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,543
    Thanks
    441
    Thanked 1,874 Times in 1,170 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 202 Times in 195 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    If I'd said it occurred just under DEMOCRAT Administrations, you'd have a point....
    Yes, and the same point applies when you select photographs seeming to implicate two Democratic administrations, but no Republican ones.

    So you say now, sock. Yet I had to shame you into saying so.
    There's no shame. It goes without saying that people are concerned about children being victimized. But what struck me as odd about your post was the insertion of those photographs of Democratic presidents meeting with popes, which was out-of-place in light of the content of the story. So, that's what I commented on. What was your intention in including those?

  14. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    Yes, and the same point applies when you select photographs seeming to implicate two Democratic administrations, but no Republican ones.
    No, it doesn't, sock. Those were the two Reigns of Error during which the most recent instances of abuse detailed in the report occurred, as you'd know if you'd read the report., which clearly delineates when the abuses occurred.

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    There's no shame.
    Of course not, sock. You are a liberal. Liberals seem to be incapable of feeling shame.

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    It goes without saying that people are concerned about children being victimized.
    It does not go without saying, sock, and no liberal has said it. For instance, you haven't said it, sock. What can be deduced from your lack of stated empathy?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    But what struck me as odd about your post was the insertion of those photographs of Democratic presidents meeting with popes, which was out-of-place in light of the content of the story. So, that's what I commented on. What was your intention in including those?
    Nothing "struck you as odd," sock. The explanation is a simple one, which you are determined not to grasp because you are primarily concerned with defending the non-existent honor of your preferred Party, not the systematic abuse of children by homosexual men.

    BTW, sock, do you recall the DEMOCRAT Party's record on championing homosexual "rights" and the methodology employed by liberal social justice warriors to make it "normal?"

  15. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    And it gets funnier You don't give a shit about the kids, if you did you wouldn't have taken the time to paste pictures of the Clintons and Obama's with the Pope, you got caught, and now you are looking for a way out. Ain't any, your deficiencies are on full display As I said, stick with the banning posts, you do end up talking to yourself, but least you don't embarrass yourself Next
    So you say. Your continued lack of concern for the child victims is glaringly obvious.

  16. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,543
    Thanks
    441
    Thanked 1,874 Times in 1,170 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 202 Times in 195 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Those were the two Reigns of Error during which the most recent instances of abuse detailed in the report occurred, as you'd know if you'd read the report., which clearly delineates when the abuses occurred.
    Did you read it? It's 900 pages long, and I'll gladly admit I didn't. However, I did read the excerpts in the NYT, which included details of abuse in June 2003 by Rev. Edward R. Graff. Do you recall who was in the presidency at the time? I also saw the details about Rev. Giella at St. John the Evangelist Church abusing many members of a large family in the 1980s. Do you recall who was president in that era?

    It does not go without saying
    It does.

    no liberal has said it
    As you know, I did.


    Nothing "struck you as odd,"
    Actually, the inclusion of those two photos of Democratic presidents with popes did, since it was such a non sequitur in relation to the article. I'm still not clear what your point was. Could you explain?

    BTW, sock, do you recall the DEMOCRAT Party's record on championing homosexual "rights" and the methodology employed by liberal social justice warriors to make it "normal?"
    The Democratic Party has a mixed record on championing homosexual rights. For example, it took a court order to get the ball rolling on gay marriage. But, for all the failures of mainstream Democrats to step up and defend the civil rights of homosexuals, they certainly did better than the GOP. As for calling it "normal," I'd say it isn't, in the same sense that green eyes, or left-handedness, or being Jewish aren't normal. Such things are statistically outside the norm. But they should not be subjected to mistreatment because of that.

Similar Threads

  1. Is this how pedophiles deserve to die?
    By Legion in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 08-14-2018, 05:37 PM
  2. Pedophiles in the news
    By Legion in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-11-2018, 11:42 AM
  3. He exposed gay pedophiles
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-30-2013, 10:05 PM
  4. YOU ARE ALL PEDOPHILES
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 10:08 AM
  5. Republicans defend pedophiles
    By Connecticut Stud in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 08:03 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •