Originally Posted by
sear
Not necessarily.
"Long term" is the term used by AHD. But I won't contest at this point.
It wouldn't matter either way. They are predictions.
You are correct in that it's not valid science to extrapolate from one data point. There is no statistical "trend" in one data point.
BUT !!
Climatologists have literally millennia of data to refer to.
They've analyzed air bubbles in arctic ice, dated the air by strata and other means, and measured the concentrations of Carbon, etc.
They've even sampled the air sealed in antique hour glasses, the kind where sand slowly spills from the top bulb through a narrow neck to the bottom bulb.
These data are vastly more than 30 years old.
Even if you were right, and you're CLEARLY not, but
even if you were right, your updated excuse doesn't disprove. For my reply to you was to refute your lie that "climate scientists, they've never been right" Bd #31.
You didn't say they were meaningless. You claimed "climate scientists, they've never been right" Bd #31.
And as usual, you have been proved wrong, AGAIN !! !!
Don't you EVER tire of being wrong ?1
You proved nothing.
Out of all the climate scientist predictions that have been made, ... you should be able to come up with at least one correct 30 year old prediction from one climate scientist. You're just floundering and flopping around now
I am much more learned on the topic of climate science than you. Don't doubt me. You aren't even aware that the Earth is in an Icehouse condition, ... colder that's it's been in 260 million years I'll await your 30 year old validated predictions.
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
— Joe Biden on Obama.
Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.
D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.
Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".
Bookmarks