Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 166 to 170 of 170

Thread: NASA: peer review science show 97+scientists agree man causes global warming

  1. #166 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    The only real difference between Richard Lindzen and Judith Curry is the value of the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS), the former thinks the value is nearer to 1.2C, whereas the latter think it around 1.6-1.7C. Otherwise they are pretty in lockstep with each other.

    https://physicstoday.scitation.org/d...T.5.8071/full/
    Have both tried to make a living generally undercutting the science like your aged hero did by hooking up with CATO in his twilight years?
    Is a half degree C across the globe something you consider inconsequential?

  2. #167 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,242 Times in 13,967 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,054 Times in 2,849 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    The only real difference between Richard Lindzen and Judith Curry is the value of the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS), the former thinks the value is nearer to 1.2C, whereas the latter think it around 1.6-1.7C. Otherwise they are pretty in lockstep with each other.

    https://physicstoday.scitation.org/d...T.5.8071/full/
    When you see "moonie" regurgitate "Richard Lindzen" it's over, as I showed the other day from over twenty sources, the guy is considered a quack in the climate studies arena, but he does make good videos, as I suppose most demogogues do

    "moonie" is going to ban me again, well, after the expected personal attacks

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Micawber (08-13-2018)

  4. #168 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    When you see "moonie" regurgitate "Richard Lindzen" it's over, as I showed the other day from over twenty sources, the guy is considered a quack in the climate studies arena, but he does make good videos, as I suppose most demogogues do

    "moonie" is going to ban me again, well, after the expected personal attacks
    You're a fucking idiot whose opinion is of no consequence. Judith Curry, quite rightly, has the utmost respect for Richard Lindzen only fools, who think they are hot stuff with Google, think otherwise.
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 08-13-2018 at 04:57 PM.

  5. #169 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,188
    Thanks
    35,735
    Thanked 50,683 Times in 27,327 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    When you see "moonie" regurgitate "Richard Lindzen" it's over, as I showed the other day from over twenty sources, the guy is considered a quack in the climate studies arena, but he does make good videos, as I suppose most demogogues do

    "moonie" is going to ban me again, well, after the expected personal attacks
    Unlike the bat shit crazy conspiracy theorists of the Climate Denial community, Lindzen accepts the basic tenets of climate science, accepts that humans are increasing GHGs in the atmosphere, and agrees that this will have a warming effect.

    Dr. Lindzen accepts the elementary tenets of climate science. He agrees that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, calling people who dispute that point “nutty.” He agrees that the level of it is rising because of human activity and that this should warm the climate.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/01/s...issenters.html

  6. #170 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    When you see "moonie" regurgitate "Richard Lindzen", the guy is considered a quack in the climate studies arena.s
    I agree with this strong opinion for the purpose of irritating Poon

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-22-2014, 03:15 AM
  2. Democrats, NASA Scientists And Global Warming
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-16-2014, 11:31 AM
  3. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-07-2013, 04:50 PM
  4. NASA: nuclear war to fight global warming
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-28-2011, 04:47 AM
  5. Peer review climate science revealed
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 11-23-2009, 11:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •