Originally Posted by
LV426
OMG, look at the fucking headline of the link:
Connerly Speaks, Angry Students Protest
So before, when you said he was denied his speaking and holding that as an example of speech being prevented, it wasn't actually true. Your own fucking link says the guy spoke, but was met with protesters. Your original argument was that protesters had prevented him from speaking (not true). Then you shifted that to say they forced him out of the Regents (not true, again). Then you shifted that to say he faced protests while he spoke (the actual, accurate answer that you didn't articulate but rather lied your fat ass off about.)
So that's two times within a handful of posts you redefined the parameters of what you meant.
Your argument was that liberal intolerance prevented Conservatives from speaking on campuses. You left out who those speakers were. Then you tried to say Connerly was a victim that had his speech blocked, then you shifted that to say that he simply faced protesters while he spoke. But that does not equal being prevented from speaking.
So you fucking lied.
Again.
Why am I not surprised?
Bookmarks