Originally Posted by
Teflon Don
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...titutionality/
If the judge applies the law as written then he should be.
The special counsel law that is in play today is different than under Nixon and Clinton. Today a crime has to have been alleged to be committed. No crime has been alleged against President Trump. Surely nobody is claiming that we needed a special counsel to try Paul Manafort? Additionally, the special counsel law as written today is supposed to be limited to avoid the Ken Star scenario.
But, will the judge cave to political pressure? If the judge rules Muellers probe unconstitutional, the left will lose its collective mind given it was a Trump appointed judge. Because that is how they think
We shall see.
Please cite where the law says a crime must be alleged? Your "source" is lacking.
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
Bookmarks